Similar to 806761a7629df268c8aed49657aeccffa6bca449.
For IR files without a target triple, -mtriple= specifies the full
target triple while -march= merely sets the architecture part of the
default target triple, leaving a target triple which may not make sense,
e.g. amdgpu-apple-darwin.
Therefore, -march= is error-prone and not recommended for tests without
a target triple. The issue has been benign as we recognize
$unknown-apple-darwin as ELF instead of rejecting it outrightly.
This patch changes AMDGPU tests to not rely on the default
OS/environment components. Tests that need fixes are not changed:
```
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fabs.f64.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fabs.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/floor.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fneg-fabs.f64.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fneg-fabs.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/r600-infinite-loop-bug-while-reorganizing-vector.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/schedule-if-2.ll
```
Replace individual operands GLC, SLC, and DLC with a single cache_policy
bitmask operand. This will reduce the number of operands in MIR and I hope
the amount of code. These operands are mostly 0 anyway.
Additional advantage that parser will accept these flags in any order unlike
now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96469
The hazard where a VMEM reads an SGPR written by a VALU counts as a data
dependency hazard, so no nops are required on GFX10. Tested with Vulkan
CTS on GFX10.1 and GFX10.3.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97926
Support for XNACK and SRAMECC is not static on some GPUs. We must be able
to differentiate between different scenarios for these dynamic subtarget
features.
The possible settings are:
- Unsupported: The GPU has no support for XNACK/SRAMECC.
- Any: Preference is unspecified. Use conservative settings that can run anywhere.
- Off: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC Off
- On: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC On
GCNSubtarget will track the four options based on the following criteria. If
the subtarget does not support XNACK/SRAMECC we say the setting is
"Unsupported". If no subtarget features for XNACK/SRAMECC are requested we
must support "Any" mode. If the subtarget features XNACK/SRAMECC exist in the
feature string when initializing the subtarget, the settings are "On/Off".
The defaults are updated to be conservatively correct, meaning if no setting
for XNACK or SRAMECC is explicitly requested, defaults will be used which
generate code that can be run anywhere. This corresponds to the "Any" setting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85882
This is the groundwork required to implement strictfp. For now, this
should be NFC for regular instructoins (many instructions just gain an
extra use of a reserved register). Regalloc won't rematerialize
instructions with reads of physical registers, but we were suffering
from that anyway with the exec reads.
Should add it for all the related FP uses (possibly with some
extras). I did not add it to either the gpr index mode instructions
(or every single VALU instruction) since it's a ridiculous feature
already modeled as an arbitrary side effect.
Also work towards marking instructions with FP exceptions. This
doesn't actually set the bit yet since this would start to change
codegen. It seems nofpexcept is currently not implied from the regular
IR FP operations. Add it to some MIR tests where I think it might
matter.
Summary: GCNHazardRecognizer fails to identify hazards that are in and around bundles. This patch allows the hazard recognizer to consider bundled instructions in both scheduler and hazard recognizer mode. We ignore “bundledness” for the purpose of detecting hazards and examine the instructions individually.
Reviewers: arsenm, msearles, rampitec
Reviewed By: rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61564
llvm-svn: 360199
