PR #66334 tried to renumber slot indexes before register allocation, but
the numbering was still affected by list entries for instructions which
had been erased. Fix this to make the register allocator's live range
length heuristics even less dependent on the history of how instructions
have been added to and removed from SlotIndexes's maps.
RegAllocGreedy uses SlotIndexes::getApproxInstrDistance to approximate
the length of a live range for its heuristics. Renumbering all slot
indexes with the default instruction distance ensures that this estimate
will be as accurate as possible, and will not depend on the history of
how instructions have been added to and removed from SlotIndexes's maps.
This also means that enabling -early-live-intervals, which runs the
SlotIndexes analysis earlier, will not cause large amounts of churn due
to different register allocator decisions.
Occupancy is expressed as waves per SIMD. This means that we need to
take into account the number of SIMDs per "CU" or, to be more precise,
the number of SIMDs over which a workgroup may be distributed.
getOccupancyWithLocalMemSize was wrong because it didn't take SIMDs
into account at all.
At the same time, we need to take into account that WGP mode offers
access to a larger total amount of LDS, since this can affect how
non-power-of-two LDS allocations are rounded. To make this work
consistently, we distinguish between (available) local memory size and
addressable local memory size (which is always limited by 64kB on
gfx10+, even with WGP mode).
This change results in a massive amount of test churn. A lot of it is
caused by the fact that the default work group size is 1024, which means
that (due to rounding effects) the default occupancy on older hardware
is 8 instead of 10, which affects scheduling via register pressure
estimates. I've adjusted most tests by just running the UTC tools, but
in some cases I manually changed the work group size to 32 or 64 to make
sure that work group size chunkiness has no effect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139468
By not clustering loads and adjusting heuristics to more aggressively reduce
register pressure we may be able to increase occupancy for the function if it
was dropped in a first pass scheduling.
Similarly, try to reduce spilling if register usage exceeds lower bound
occupancy.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130329
Using a BufferSize of one for memory ProcResources will result in better
ILP since it more accurately models the dependencies between memory ops
and their consumers on an in-order processor. After this change, the
scheduler will treat the data edges from loads as blocking so that
stalls are guaranteed when waiting for data to be retreaved from memory.
Since we don't actually track waitcnt here, this should do a better job
at modeling their behavior.
Practically, this means that the scheduler will trigger the 'STALL'
heuristic more often.
This type of change needs to be evaluated experimentally. Preliminary
results are positive.
Fixes: SWDEV-282962
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114777
D106408 enables rematerialization of instructions with virtual
register uses. That has uncovered the bug in the allUsesAvailableAt
implementation: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51516.
In the majority of cases canRematerializeAt() called to check if
an instruction can be rematerialized before the given UseIdx.
However, SplitEditor::enterIntvAtEnd() calls it to rematerialize
an instruction at the end of a block passing LIS.getMBBEndIdx()
into the check. In the testcase from the bug it has attempted to
rematerialize ADDXri after STRXui in bb.17. The use operand %55
of the ADD is killed by the STRX but that is undetected by the check
because it adjusts passed UseIdx to the reg slot, before the kill.
The value is dead at the index passed to the check however.
This change uses a later of passed UseIdx and its reg slot. This
shall be correct because if are checking an availability of operands
before an instruction that instruction cannot be the one defining
these operands. If we are checking for late rematerialization we
are really interested if operands live past the instruction.
The bug is not exploitable without D106408 but needed to reland
reverted D106408.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108475
