"ninja check-llvm" is failing on tip of tree.
This reverts commit ec0aa1646e9953d1a8d0d15dc381d3250c854572.
This reverts commit 1b65742f8c71f576381fe85d5e34579b24f2d874.
In this case, a trivial GEP chain has the form:
```
%ptr = getelementptr sameType, %base, constant
%val = getelementptr sameType, %ptr, %variable
```
That is, a one-index GEP consumes another (of the same basis and result
type) one-index GEP, where the inner GEP uses a constant index and the
outer GEP uses a variable index. For chains of this type, it is trivial
to reorder them (by simply swapping the indexes). The result of doing so
is better AddrMode matching for users of the ultimate ptr produced by
GEP chain.
Future patches can extend this to support non-trivial GEP chains (e.g.
those with different basis types and/or multiple indices).
Similar to 806761a7629df268c8aed49657aeccffa6bca449.
For IR files without a target triple, -mtriple= specifies the full
target triple while -march= merely sets the architecture part of the
default target triple, leaving a target triple which may not make sense,
e.g. amdgpu-apple-darwin.
Therefore, -march= is error-prone and not recommended for tests without
a target triple. The issue has been benign as we recognize
$unknown-apple-darwin as ELF instead of rejecting it outrightly.
This patch changes AMDGPU tests to not rely on the default
OS/environment components. Tests that need fixes are not changed:
```
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fabs.f64.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fabs.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/floor.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fneg-fabs.f64.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fneg-fabs.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/r600-infinite-loop-bug-while-reorganizing-vector.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/schedule-if-2.ll
```
Previously SGPR triples like s[3:5] were aligned on a 3-SGPR boundary
which has no basis in hardware.
Aligning them on a 4-SGPR boundary is at least justified by the
architecture reference guide which says: "Quad-alignment of SGPRs is
required for operation on more than 64-bits".
Currently there are no instructions that take SGPR triples as operands
so the issue is latent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151463
Re-land D145441 with data layout upgrade code fixed to not break OpenMP.
This reverts commit 3f2fbe92d0f40bcb46db7636db9ec3f7e7899b27.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149776
Per discussion at
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/representing-buffer-descriptors-in-the-amdgpu-target-call-for-suggestions/68798,
we define two new address spaces for AMDGCN targets.
The first is address space 7, a non-integral address space (which was
already in the data layout) that has 160-bit pointers (which are
256-bit aligned) and uses a 32-bit offset. These pointers combine a
128-bit buffer descriptor and a 32-bit offset, and will be usable with
normal LLVM operations (load, store, GEP). However, they will be
rewritten out of existence before code generation.
The second of these is address space 8, the address space for "buffer
resources". These will be used to represent the resource arguments to
buffer instructions, and new buffer intrinsics will be defined that
take them instead of <4 x i32> as resource arguments. ptr
addrspace(8). These pointers are 128-bits long (with the same
alignment). They must not be used as the arguments to getelementptr or
otherwise used in address computations, since they can have
arbitrarily complex inherent addressing semantics that can't be
represented in LLVM. Even though, like their address space 7 cousins,
these pointers have deterministic ptrtoint/inttoptr semantics, they
are defined to be non-integral in order to prevent optimizations that
rely on pointers being a [0, [addr_max]] value from applying to them.
Future work includes:
- Defining new buffer intrinsics that take ptr addrspace(8) resources.
- A late rewrite to turn address space 7 operations into buffer
intrinsics and offset computations.
This commit also updates the "fallback address space" for buffer
intrinsics to the buffer resource, and updates the alias analysis
table.
Depends on D143437
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145441
On GFX9+, SMEM instructions have an _SGPR_IMM form which is strictly
more powerful than the _SGPR form. It simplifies codegen if we always
select the _SGPR_IMM form with an immediate offset of 0 instead of the
_SGPR form.
Note that this patch just makes minimal changes to the selection
patterns to prove the concept. Further simplifications are possible to
reduced the number of selection patterns.
On GFX9 the _SGPR form of the Real instruction is still required for
assembly/disassembly but on GFX10+ it can be removed completely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147334
Following up on the removal of BufferPSV in commit 43b86bf992 ("AMDGPU:
Remove BufferPseudoSourceValue")
It is unclear what exactly the right address space for images should be.
They seem morally closest to buffers, so that's what I went with. In
practical terms, address space 7 is better than address space 0 because
it can't alias with LDS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138949
The use of a PSV for buffer intrinsics is misleading because it may be
misinterpreted as all buffer intrinsics accessing the same address in
memory, which is clearly not true.
Instead, build MachineMemOperands without a pointer value but with an
address space, so that address space-based alias analysis can still
work.
There is a lot of test churn because previously address space 4
(constant address space) was used as an address space for buffer
intrinsics. This doesn't make much sense and seems to have been an
accident -- see the change in
AMDGPUTargetMachine::getAddressSpaceForPseudoSourceKind.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138711
In GFX10, there is no advantage to shrinking these instructions pre-RA,
so this just saves a bit of work.
In GFX11 there is an advantage to *not* shrinking them pre-RA, because
the register classes for 16-bit operands are less restrictive in the
VOP3 form than in the shrunk form. This patch is a prerequisite for
actually setting up those register classes correctly for 16-bit vs
non-16-bit operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133769
In the 2e29b0138ca243 we introduce a specific solving algorithm
that analyzes the VGPR to SGPR copies use chains and either lowers
the copy to v_readfirstlane_b32 or converts the whole chain to VALU forms.
Same time we still have the code that blindly converts to VALU REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs
in case they produce SGPR but have VGPRs input operands. In case the REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs
are in the VGPR to SGPR copy use chain, and this chain was considered long enough to convert
copy to v_readfistlane_b32, further lowering them to VALU leads to several kinds of issues.
At first, we have v_readfistlane_b32 which is completely useless because most parts of its use chain
were moved to VALU forms. Second, we may encounter subtle bugs related to the EXEC-dependent CF
because of the weird mixing of SALU and VALU instructions.
This change removes the code that moves REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs to VALU. Instead, we use the fact
that both REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs have copy semantics. That is, if they define SGPR but have VGPR inputs,
we insert VGPR to SGPR copies to make them pure SGPR. Then, the new copies are processed by the common
VGPR to SGPR lowering algorithm.
This is Part 2 in the series of commits aiming at the massive refactoring of the SIFixSGPRCopies pass.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130367
In the 2e29b0138ca243 we introduce a specific solving algorithm
that analyzes the VGPR to SGPR copies use chains and either lowers
the copy to v_readfirstlane_b32 or converts the whole chain to VALU forms.
Same time we still have the code that blindly converts to VALU REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs
in case they produce SGPR but have VGPRs input operands. In case the REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs
are in the VGPR to SGPR copy use chain, and this chain was considered long enough to convert
copy to v_readfistlane_b32, further lowering them to VALU leads to several kinds of issues.
At first, we have v_readfistlane_b32 which is completely useless because most parts of its use chain
were moved to VALU forms. Second, we may encounter subtle bugs related to the EXEC-dependent CF
because of the weird mixing of SALU and VALU instructions.
This change removes the code that moves REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs to VALU. Instead, we use the fact
that both REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs have copy semantics. That is, if they define SGPR but have VGPR inputs,
we insert VGPR to SGPR copies to make them pure SGPR. Then, the new copies are processed by the common
VGPR to SGPR lowering algorithm.
This is Part 2 in the series of commits aiming at the massive refactoring of the SIFixSGPRCopies pass.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130367
This was stored in LiveIntervals, but not actually used for anything
related to LiveIntervals. It was only used in one check for if a load
instruction is rematerializable. I also don't think this was entirely
correct, since it was implicitly assuming constant loads are also
dereferenceable.
Remove this and rely only on the invariant+dereferenceable flags in
the memory operand. Set the flag based on the AA query upfront. This
should have the same net benefit, but has the possible disadvantage of
making this AA query nonlazy.
Preserve the behavior of assuming pointsToConstantMemory implying
dereferenceable for now, but maybe this should be changed.
Previously SIFoldOperands::foldInstOperand would only fold a
non-inlinable immediate into a single user, so as not to increase code
size by adding the same 32-bit literal operand to many instructions.
This patch removes that restriction, so that a non-inlinable immediate
will be folded into any number of users. The rationale is:
- It reduces the number of registers used for holding constant values,
which might increase occupancy. (On the other hand, many of these
registers are SGPRs which no longer affect occupancy on GFX10+.)
- It reduces ALU stalls between the instruction that loads a constant
into a register, and the instruction that uses it.
- The above benefits are expected to outweigh any increase in code size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114643
Description: This change enables the compare operations to be selected to SALU/VALU form
dependent of the SDNode divergence flag.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106079
Currently we are resolving lane/subregister conflict by visiting
instructions sequentially in current block to see whether there is any
use of the tainted lanes. To save compile time, we are not doing further
check in successor blocks. This sounds reasonable without subgregister liveness.
But since we have added subregister liveness tracking capability to
register coalescer, we can easily determine whether we have subregister
liveness conflict by checking subranges. This would help coalescing more
COPYs for target that enables subregister liveness tracking.
Reviewed by: arsenm, qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104509
This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert
it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I
converted all of the tests already, but likely missed a few).
Not sure what the exact syntax and policy should be. We can continue
printing the number of bytes for non-generic instructions to avoid
test churn and only allow non-scalar types for generic instructions.
This will currently print the LLT in parentheses, but accept parsing
the existing integers and implicitly converting to scalar. The
parentheses are a bit ugly, but the parser logic seems unable to deal
without either parentheses or some keyword to indicate the start of a
type.
Replace individual operands GLC, SLC, and DLC with a single cache_policy
bitmask operand. This will reduce the number of operands in MIR and I hope
the amount of code. These operands are mostly 0 anyway.
Additional advantage that parser will accept these flags in any order unlike
now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96469
This reverts commit 329aeb5db43f5e69df038fb20d2def77fe6f8595,
and relands commit 61f006ac655431bd44b9e089f74c73bec0c1a48c.
This is a continuation of D89456.
As it was suggested there, now that SCEV models `PtrToInt`,
we can try to improve SCEV's pointer handling.
In particular, i believe, i will need this in the future
to further fix `SCEVAddExpr`operation type handling.
This removes special handling of `ConstantPointerNull`
from `ScalarEvolution::createSCEV()`, and add constant folding
into `ScalarEvolution::getPtrToIntExpr()`.
This way, `null` constants stay as such in SCEV's,
but gracefully become zero integers when asked.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98147
This is a continuation of D89456.
As it was suggested there, now that SCEV models `PtrToInt`,
we can try to improve SCEV's pointer handling.
In particular, i believe, i will need this in the future
to further fix `SCEVAddExpr`operation type handling.
This removes special handling of `ConstantPointerNull`
from `ScalarEvolution::createSCEV()`, and add constant folding
into `ScalarEvolution::getPtrToIntExpr()`.
This way, `null` constants stay as such in SCEV's,
but gracefully become zero integers when asked.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98147
Previously we would use a bundle to hint the register allocator to not
overwrite the pointers in a sequence of loads to avoid breaking soft
clauses. This bundling was based on a fuzzy register pressure
heuristic, so we could not guarantee using more registers than are
really available. This would result in register allocator failing on
unsatisfiable bundles. Use a kill to artificially extend the live
ranges, so we can always succeed at register allocation even if it
means extra spills in the worst case.
This seems to capture most of the benefit of the bundle while avoiding
most of the risk presented by the bundle. However the lit tests do
show a handful of regressions. In some cases with sequences of
volatile loads, unused load components end up getting reallocated to
the next load which forces a wait between. There are also a few small
scheduling regressions where a hazard used to be avoided, and one
spill torture test which for some reason nearly doubles the stack
usage. There is also a bit of noise from leftover kills (it may make
sense for post-RA pseudos to strip all of these out).
Fixes a testcase that was overcommitting large register tuples to a
bundle, which the register allocator could not possibly satisfy. This
was producing a bundle which used nearly all of the available SGPRs
with a series of 16-dword loads (not all of which are freely available
to use).
This is a quick hack for some deeper issues with how the clause
bundler tracks register pressure.
Overall the pressure tracking used here doesn't make sense and is too
imprecise for what it needs to avoid the allocator failing. The
pressure estimate does not account for the alignment requirements of
large SGPR tuples, so this was really underestimating the pressure
impact. This also ignores the impact of the extended live range of the
use registers after the bundle is introduced. Additionally, it didn't
account for some wide tuples not being available due to reserved
registers.
This regresses a few cases. These end up introducing more
spilling. This is also a function of the global pressure being used in
the decision to bundle, not the local pressure impact of the bundle
itself.
Support for XNACK and SRAMECC is not static on some GPUs. We must be able
to differentiate between different scenarios for these dynamic subtarget
features.
The possible settings are:
- Unsupported: The GPU has no support for XNACK/SRAMECC.
- Any: Preference is unspecified. Use conservative settings that can run anywhere.
- Off: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC Off
- On: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC On
GCNSubtarget will track the four options based on the following criteria. If
the subtarget does not support XNACK/SRAMECC we say the setting is
"Unsupported". If no subtarget features for XNACK/SRAMECC are requested we
must support "Any" mode. If the subtarget features XNACK/SRAMECC exist in the
feature string when initializing the subtarget, the settings are "On/Off".
The defaults are updated to be conservatively correct, meaning if no setting
for XNACK or SRAMECC is explicitly requested, defaults will be used which
generate code that can be run anywhere. This corresponds to the "Any" setting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85882
Allow parsing generated mir with custom pseudo source value tokens.
Also rename pseudo source values to have more meaningful names.
Relands ba7dcd8542ab, which had memory leaks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95215
Allow parsing generated mir with custom pseudo source value tokens.
Also rename pseudo source values to have more meaningful names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94768
Following on from D87757 "[SplitKit] Only copy live lanes", in
SplitEditor::addDeadDef, when we're checking whether the parent live
interval has a subrange defining the same lanes, tolerate the case
where the parent subrange defines a superset of the lanes. This can
happen when the child subrange comes from SplitEditor::buildCopy
decomposing a partial copy into a sequence of subreg copies that cover
the required lanes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88020
