The microMIPS instruction set is compatible with the MIPS instruction
set at the assembly level but not in terms of encodings. `nop` in
microMIPS is a special case as it has the same encoding as `nop` for
MIPS.
Fix this error by reducing the usage of NOP in the MIPS backend such
that only that ISA correct variants are produced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124716
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
Summary:
The INLINEASM MIR instructions use immediate operands to encode the values of some operands.
The MachineInstr pretty printer function already handles those operands and prints human readable annotations instead of the immediates. This patch adds similar annotations to the output of the MIRPrinter, however uses the new MIROperandComment feature.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, arsenm, efriedma
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: qcolombet, sdardis, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78088
Octeon branches (bbit0/bbit032/bbit1/bbit132) have an immediate operand,
so it is legal to have such replacement within
MipsBranchExpansion::replaceBranch().
According to the specification, a branch (e.g. bbit0 ) looks like:
bbit0 rs p offset // p is an immediate operand
if !rs<p> then branch
Without this patch, an assertion triggers in the method,
and the problem has been found in the real example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76842
Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945 for reference,
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67433
llvm-svn: 371608
Expand on LONG_BRANCH_LUi and LONG_BRANCH_(D)ADDiu pseudo
instructions by creating variants which support
less operands/accept GPR64Opnds as their operand in order
to appease the machine verifier pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53977
llvm-svn: 346133
When potential jump instruction and target are in the same segment, use
jump instruction with immediate field.
In cases where offset does not fit immediate value of a bc/j instructions,
offset is stored into register, and then jump register instruction is used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48019
llvm-svn: 339126
Extend LONG_BRANCH_LUi and LONG_BRANCH_ADDiu pseudo instructions with
additional flag, so instead of always lowering to lui %hi(...),
addiu %lo(...) or addiu %hi(...), now they can lower to either %lo, %hi,
%higher or %highest depending on the added flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47941
llvm-svn: 334490
MipsLongBranchPass and MipsHazardSchedule passes are joined to one pass
because of mutual conflict. When MipsHazardSchedule inserts 'nop's, it
potentially breaks some jumps, so they have to be expanded to long
branches. When some branch is expanded to long branch, it potentially
creates a hazard situation, which should be fixed by adding nops.
New pass is called MipsBranchExpansion, it combines these two passes,
and runs them alternately until one of them reports no changes were made.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46641
llvm-svn: 332977
MipsLongBranchPass and MipsHazardSchedule passes are joined to one pass
because of mutual conflict. When MipsHazardSchedule inserts 'nop's, it
potentially breaks some jumps, so they have to be expanded to long
branches. When some branch is expanded to long branch, it potentially
creates a hazard situation, which should be fixed by adding nops.
New pass is called MipsBranchExpansion, it combines these two passes,
and runs them alternately until one of them reports no changes were made.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46641
llvm-svn: 332834
Add support for this target hook, covering MIPS, microMIPS and MIPSR6, along
with some tests. Also add missing getOppositeBranchOpc() cases exposed by the
tests.
Reviewers: atanasyan, abeserminji, smaksimovic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46794
llvm-svn: 332446
Move the hazard scheduling pass to after the long branch pass, as the
long branch pass can create forbiddden slot hazards. Rather than complicating
the implementation of the long branch pass to handle forbidden slot hazards,
just reorder the passes.
llvm-svn: 318657
