mflr is kind of expensive on Power version smaller than 10, so we should
schedule the store for the mflr's def away from mflr.
In epilogue, the expensive mtlr has no user for its def, so it doesn't
matter that the load and the mtlr are back-to-back.
Reviewed By: RolandF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137423
The method of counting resource consumption is modified to be based on
"Cycles" value when DFA is not used.
The calculation of ResMII is modified to total "Cycles" and divide it
by the number of units for each resource. Previously, ResMII was
excessive because it was assumed that resources were consumed for
the cycles of "Latency" value.
The method of resource reservation is modified similarly. When a
value of "Cycles" is larger than 1, the resource is considered to be
consumed by 1 for cycles of its length from the scheduled cycle.
To realize this, ResourceManager maintains a resource table for all
slots. Previously, resource consumption was always 1 for 1 cycle
regardless of the value of "Cycles" or "Latency".
In addition, the number of micro operations per cycle is modified to
be constrained by "IssueWidth". To disable the constraint,
--pipeliner-force-issue-width=100 can be used.
For the case of using DFA, the scheduling results are unchanged.
Reviewed By: dpenry
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133572
PowerPC has its custom scheduler heuristic. It calls parent classes'
tryCandidate in override version, but the function returns void, so this
way doesn't actually help. This patch duplicates code from base scheduler
into PPC machine scheduler class, which does what we wanted.
Reviewed By: steven.zhang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94464
The instruction addi is usually used to post increase the loop indvar, which looks like this:
label_X:
load x, base(i)
...
y = op x
...
i = addi i, 1
goto label_X
However, for PowerPC, if there are too many vsx instructions that between y = op x and i = addi i, 1,
it will use all the hw resource that block the execution of i = addi, i, 1, which result in the stall
of the load instruction in next iteration. So, a heuristic is added to move the addi as early as possible
to have the load hide the latency of vsx instructions, if other heuristic didn't apply to avoid the starve.
Reviewed By: jji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80269
Summary:
If we didn't set the value for hasSideEffects bit in our td file, `llvm-tblgen`
will set it as true for those instructions which has no match pattern.
The instructions `MTLR` and `MFLR` don't set the hasSideEffects flag and don't
have match pattern, so their hasSideEffects flag will be set true by
`llvm-tblgen`.
But in fact, we can use `[LR]` to model the two instructions, so they should not
have SideEffects.
This patch is to modify the hasSideEffects of MTLR and MFLR from 1 to 0.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71390
Summary:
This is brought up in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64662?id=209923#inline-599490
CFI information are non-relevant to quite some testcases,
we should get rid of checking them when its unecessary.
This patch avoid generating cfi info in testcases that are not
testing prolog/epilog or exception handling.
Reviewers: kbarton, hfinkel, nemanjai, #powerpc
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: MaskRay, shchenz, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67016
llvm-svn: 370505
