R_RISCV_CALL/R_RISCV_CALL_PLT distinction is not necessary and
R_RISCV_CALL has been deprecated. Since https://reviews.llvm.org/D132530
`call foo` assembles to R_RISCV_CALL_PLT. The `@plt` suffix is not
useful and can be removed now (matching AArch64 and PowerPC).
GNU assembler assembles `call foo` to RISCV_CALL_PLT since 2022-09
(70f35d72ef04cd23771875c1661c9975044a749c).
Without this patch, unconditionally changing MO_CALL to MO_PLT could
create `jump .L1@plt, a0`, which is invalid in LLVM integrated assembler
and GNU assembler.
We don't have very many compressible FP instructions, just load and store.
These instruction require the FP register to be f8-f15.
This patch changes the FP allocation order to prioritize f10-f15 first.
These are also the FP argument registers. So I allocated them in reverse
order starting at f15 to avoid taking the first argument registers.
This appears to match gcc allocation order.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146488
These instructions requires both register operands to be compressible
so I've only applied the hint if we already have a GPRC physical register
assigned for the other register operand.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139079
After D86836, we can define multiple cost values for
different cost models. So here we set CostPerUse to
1 iff RVC is enabled to avoid potential impact on RA.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117741
These tests are interested in the FP instructions being used, not
the conversions needed to pass the arguments/returns in GPRs.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116869
Test that STRICT_FMINNUM/FMAXNUM are lowered to libcalls for f32/f64.
The RISC-V instructions don't match the behavior of fmin/fmax libcalls
with respect to SNaN.
Promoting FMINNUM/FMAXNUM for f16 needs more work outside of the
RISC-V backend.
Reviewed By: asb, arcbbb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115680
