The LIT test cases were migrated with the script provided by
Nikita Popov.
No manual changes were made. Committed without review since
no functional changes, after consultation with uweigand.
If DoneMBB becomes empty it must have CC added to its live-in list, since it
will fall-through into EndMBB. This happens when the CLC loop does the
complete range.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
llvm-svn: 327834
This re-applies commit r292189, reverted in r292191.
SelectionDAGBuilder recognizes libfuncs using some homegrown
parameter type-checking.
Use TLI instead, removing another heap of redundant code.
This isn't strictly NFC, as the SDAG code was too lax.
Concretely, this means changes are required to a few tests:
- calling a non-variadic function via a variadic prototype isn't OK;
it just happens to work on x86_64 (but not on, e.g., aarch64).
- mempcpy has a size_t parameter; the SDAG code accepts any integer
type, which meant using i32 on x86_64 worked.
- a handful of SystemZ tests check the SDAG support for lax prototype
checking: Ulrich agrees on removing them.
I don't think it's worth supporting any of these (IMO) invalid
testcases. Instead, fix them to be more meaningful.
llvm-svn: 294028
Return is now considered a predicable instruction, and is converted
to a newly-added CondReturn (which maps to BCR to %r14) instruction by
the if conversion pass.
Also, fused compare-and-branch transform knows about conditional
returns, emitting the proper fused instructions for them.
This transform triggers on a *lot* of tests, hence the huge diffstat.
The changes are mostly jX to br %r14 -> bXr %r14.
Author: koriakin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17339
llvm-svn: 265689
Generalize r188163 to cope with return types other than MVT::i32, just
as the existing visitMemCmpCall code did. I've split this out into a
subroutine so that it can be used for other upcoming patches.
I also noticed that I'd used the wrong API to record the out chain.
It's a load that uses DAG.getRoot() rather than getRoot(), so the out
chain should go on PendingLoads. I don't have a testcase for that because
we don't do any interesting scheduling on z yet.
llvm-svn: 188540
