Reverted due to failures on buildbots, where a new cl flag was placed
in the wrong file, resulting in link errors.
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/198/builds/8548
This reverts commit 0b398256b3f72204ad1f7c625efe4990204e898a.
This patch adds support for printing the proposed non-instruction debug
info ("RemoveDIs") out to textual IR. This patch does not add any
bitcode support, parsing support, or documentation.
Printing of the new format is controlled by a flag added in this patch,
`--write-experimental-debuginfo`, which defaults to false. The new
format will be printed *iff* this flag is true, so whether we use the IR
format is completely independent of whether we use non-instruction debug
info during LLVM passes (which is controlled by the
`--try-experimental-debuginfo-iterators` flag).
Even with the flag disabled, some existing tests need to be updated, as this
patch causes debug intrinsic declarations to be changed in a round trip,
such that they always appear at the end of a module and have no attributes
(this has no functional change on the module).
The design of this new IR format was proposed previously on
Discourse, and any further discussion about the design can still be
contributed there:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-debuginfo-proposed-changes-to-the-textual-ir-representation-for-debug-values/73491
Port CodeGenPrepare to new pass manager and dependency
BasicBlockSectionsProfileReader
Fixes: #75380
Co-authored-by: Krishna-13-cyber <84722531+Krishna-13-cyber@users.noreply.github.com>
Revert e0c554ad87d18dcbfcb9b6485d0da800ae1338d1 "Port CodeGenPrepare to new pass manager (and BasicBlockSectionsProfil… (#75380)"
Revert #75380 and #77054 as they were breaking EXPENSIVE_CHECKS buildbots: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/104
Port CodeGenPrepare to new pass manager and dependency
BasicBlockSectionsProfileReader
Fixes: #64560
Co-authored-by: Krishna-13-cyber <84722531+Krishna-13-cyber@users.noreply.github.com>
It turns out that CodeGenPrepare will skip over consecutive select
instructions as it knows it can optimise them all at the same time. This
is unfortunate for the RemoveDIs project to remove intrinsic-based
debug-info, because that means debug-info attached to those skipped
instructions doesn't get seen by optimizeInst and so updated. Add code
to handle debug-info on those skipped instructions manually.
This code will also have been slower when it had dbg.values stuffed in
between instructions, but with RemoveDIs it'll go faster because the
dbg.values won't break up the select sequence.
When all the large const offsets masked with the same value from bit-12 to bit-23.
Fold
add x8, x0, #2031, lsl #12
add x8, x8, #960
ldr x9, [x8, x8]
ldr x8, [x8, #2056]
into
add x8, x0, #2031, lsl #12
ldr x9, [x8, #960]
ldr x8, [x8, #3016]
CodeGenPrepare needs to support the maintenence of DPValues, the
non-instruction replacement for dbg.value intrinsics. This means there are
a few functions we need to duplicate or replicate the functionality of:
* fixupDbgValue for setting users of sunk addr GEPs,
* The remains of placeDbgValues needs a DPValue implementation for sinking
* Rollback of RAUWs needs to update DPValues
* Rollback of instruction removal needs supporting (see github #73350)
* A few places where we have to use iterators rather than instructions.
There are three places where we have to use the setHeadBit call on
iterators to indicate which portion of debug-info records we're about to
splice around. This is because CodeGenPrepare, unlike other optimisation
passes, is very much concerned with which block an operation occurs in and
where in the block instructions are because it's preparing things to be in
a format that's good for SelectionDAG.
There isn't a large amount of test coverage for debuginfo behaviours in
this pass, hence I've added some more.
Fix the issue by not reusing the zext at all. The code already handles
creation of new zexts if more than one is needed. Always use that
code-path instead of trying to reuse the old zext in some case.
(Alternatively we could also drop poison-generating flags on the old
zext, but it seems cleaner to not reuse it at all, especially if it's
not always possible anyway.)
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/72046.
There are many tests that specify a target triple/CPU flags but no
DataLayout which can lead to IR being generated that has unusual
behaviour. This commit attempts to use the default DataLayout based
on the relevant flags if there is no explicit override on the command
line or in the IR file.
One thing that is not currently possible to differentiate from a missing
datalayout `target datalayout = ""` in the IR file since the current
APIs don't allow detecting this case. If it is considered useful to
support this case (instead of passing "-data-layout=" on the command
line), I can change IR parsers to track whether they have seen such a
directive and change the callback type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141060
SVE supports scalar+vector and scalar+extw(vector) addressing modes.
However, the masked gather/scatter intrinsics take a vector of
addresses, which means address computations can be hoisted out of
loops. The is especially true for things like offsets where the
true size of offsets is lost by the time you get to code generation.
This is problematic because it forces the code generator to legalise
towards `<vscale x 2 x ty>` vectors that will not maximise bandwidth
if the main block datatypes is in fact i32 or smaller.
This patch sinks GEPs and extends for cases where one of the above
addressing modes can be used.
NOTE: There are cases where it would be better to split the extend
in two with one half hoisted out of a loop and the other within the
loop. Whilst true I think this switch of default is still better
than before because the extra extends are an improvement over being
forced to split a gather/scatter.
PR #66334 tried to renumber slot indexes before register allocation, but
the numbering was still affected by list entries for instructions which
had been erased. Fix this to make the register allocator's live range
length heuristics even less dependent on the history of how instructions
have been added to and removed from SlotIndexes's maps.
RegAllocGreedy uses SlotIndexes::getApproxInstrDistance to approximate
the length of a live range for its heuristics. Renumbering all slot
indexes with the default instruction distance ensures that this estimate
will be as accurate as possible, and will not depend on the history of
how instructions have been added to and removed from SlotIndexes's maps.
This also means that enabling -early-live-intervals, which runs the
SlotIndexes analysis earlier, will not cause large amounts of churn due
to different register allocator decisions.
Before elimination of mostly empty block it makes sense to remove dead PHI nodes.
It open more opportunity for elimination plus eliminates dead code itself.
It appeared that change results in failing many unit tests and some of
them I've updated and for another one I disable this optimization.
The pattern I observed in the tests is that there is a infinite loop
without side effects. As a result after elimination of dead phi node all other
related instruction are also removed and tests stops to check what it is expected.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158503
Refresh of the generic scheduling model to use A510 instead of A55.
Main benefits are to the little core, and introducing SVE scheduling information.
Changes tested on various OoO cores, no performance degradation is seen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156799
No longer conservatively assume a load/store accesses the stack when we
can prove that we did not compute any stack-relative address up to this
point in the program.
We do this in a cheap not-quite-a-dataflow-analysis: Assume
`NoStackAddressUsed` when all predecessors of a block already guarantee
it. Process blocks in reverse post order to guarantee that except for
loop headers we have processed all predecessors of a block before
processing the block itself. For loops we accept the conservative answer
as they are unlikely to be shrink-wrappable anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152213
This is a follow-up to b71edfaa4ec3c998aadb35255ce2f60bba2940b0
since I forgot the lit.local.cfg files in that one.
Reformatting is done with `black`.
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.
If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.
RFC Thread below:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Reviewed By: barannikov88, kwk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150762
With this patch an undefined mask in a shufflevector will be printed as poison.
This change is done to support the new shufflevector semantics
for undefined mask elements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149210
This function was added for ARM targets, but aligning global/stack pointer
arguments passed to memcpy/memmove/memset can improve code size and
performance for all targets that don't have fast unaligned accesses.
This adds a generic implementation that adjusts the alignment to pointer
size if unaligned accesses are slow.
Review D134168 suggests that this significantly improves performance on
synthetic benchmarks such as Dhrystone on RV32 as it avoids memcpy() calls.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134282
For -fno-pic, without DW_EH_PE_indirect, the personality routine pointer in a
CIE needs an R_AARCH64_ABS64 relocation. In common configurations that
`__gcc_personality_v0` is defined in a shared object, this will lead to a
discouraged canonical PLT entry, or, if `ld.lld -z notext` (betwen D122459 and
D143136), a dynamic R_AARCH64_ABS64 relocation with an incorrect offset:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60392
Since GCC uses DW_EH_PE_indirect for -fno-pic code (the behavior hasn't changed
since the initial port in 2012), let's follow suit by simplifying the code.
(
For tiny and small code models, we use DW_EH_PE_sdata8 instead of GCC's
DW_EH_PE_sdata4. This is a deliberate choice to support personality-.eh_frame
offset > 2GiB. This is unneeded for small code model since "Max text segment
size < 2GiB" but making `-fno-pic -mcmodel={tiny,small}` different seems
unnecessary: the scenarios that uses both -fno-pic and C++ exceptions have been
increasingly rare now, so there is little advantage optimizing for the little
size saving with code complexity.
)
---
Two clang/test/Interpreter tests would fail without 6747fc07d1aa94e22622e278e5a02ba70675ac9b
([ORC] Use JITLink as the default linker for LLJIT on Linux/arm64.)
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143039
For -fno-pic, without DW_EH_PE_indirect, the personality routine pointer in a
CIE needs an R_AARCH64_ABS64 relocation. In common configurations that
`__gcc_personality_v0` is defined in a shared object, this will lead to a
discouraged canonical PLT entry, or, if `ld.lld -z notext` (betwen D122459 and
D143136), a dynamic R_AARCH64_ABS64 relocation with an incorrect offset:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60392
Since GCC uses DW_EH_PE_indirect for -fno-pic code (the behavior hasn't changed
since the initial port in 2012), let's follow suit by simplifying the code.
(
For tiny and small code models, we use DW_EH_PE_sdata8 instead of GCC's
DW_EH_PE_sdata4. This is a deliberate choice to support personality-.eh_frame
offset > 2GiB. This is necessary for small code model since "Max text segment
size < 2GiB" but it is unnecessary to make `-fno-pic -mcmodel={tiny,small}`
different: The scenarios that uses both -fno-pic and C++ exceptions have been
increasingly rare now, so there is little advantage optimizing for the little
size saving with code complexity.
)
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143039
This is an extension to the code for sinking splats to multiplies, where
if we can detect that the top bits are known-zero we can treat the
instruction like a zext. The existing code was also adjusted in the
process to make it more precise about only sinking if both operands are
zext or sext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141275
Instcombine prefers this canonical form (see getPreferredVectorIndex),
as does IRBuilder when passing the index as an integer so we may as
well use the prefered form from creation.
NOTE: All test changes are mechanical with nothing else expected
beyond a change of index type from i32 to i64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140983
NVPTX/dont-introduce-addrspacecast.ll required manually removing a check for
a bitcast.
AArch64/combine-address-mode.ll required rerunning update_test_checks
Mips required some manual updates due to a CHECK-NEXT coming after a
deleted bitcast.
ARM/sink-addrmode.ll needed one small manual fix.
Excludes one X86 function which needs more attention.
This currently does not make much of a difference (only one tests is
affected), but it is helpful e.g. for the out-of-tree CHERI target where
Builder.CreateMemCpy() can add attributes other than parameter alignment.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135075
This patch extends CodeGenPrepare to lower zext v16i8 -> v16i32 in loops
using a wide shuffle creating a v64i8 vector, selecting groups of 3
zero elements and an element from the input.
This is profitable on AArch64 where such shuffles can be lowered to tbl
instructions, but only in loops, because it requires materializing 4
masks, which can be done in the loop preheader.
This is the only reason the transform is part of CGP. If there's a
better alternative I missed, please let me know. The same goes for the
shouldReplaceZExtWithShuffle hook which guards this. I am not sure if
this transform will be beneficial on other targets, but it seems like
there is no way other convenient way.
This improves the generated code for loops like the one below in
combination with D96522.
int foo(uint8_t *p, int N) {
unsigned long long sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < N ; i++, p++) {
unsigned int v = *p;
sum += (v < 127) ? v : 256 - v;
}
return sum;
}
https://clang.godbolt.org/z/Wco866MjY
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120571
This hook is currently only used by CodeGenPrepare, which will sink *and
duplicate* an 'and' into a block that has an 'icmp 0' user of it if the
hook returns true.
This hook is less useful for RISC-V than for targets like AArch64 that
have a TBZ (test bit and branch if zero instruction), but may still be
profitable if Zbs is available and a BEXTI can be selected.
Conservatively, we return false even if Zbs is enabled for any masks
that fit in the ANDI immediate because it's possible the only use is a
branch on the result, and ANDI+BNEZ => BEXTI+BNEZ isn't a profitable
transformation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131492
Details:
Currently CodeGenPrepare is very time consuming in handling big functions.
Old Algorithm :
It iterate each BB in function, and go on handle very instructions in BB.
Due to some instruction optimizations may affect the BBs' dominate tree.
The old logic will re-iterate and try optimize for each BB.
Suppose we have a big function with 20000 BBs, If we handled the last BB
with fine tuning the dominate tree. We need totally re-iterate and try optimize
the 20000 BBs from the beginning.
The Complex is near N!
And we really encounter somes big tests (> 20000 BBs) that cost more than 30
mins in this pass. (Debug version compiler will cost 2 hours here)
What this patch do for huge function ?
It mainly changes the iteration way for optimization.
1 We do optimizeBlock for each BB (that is same with old way).
And, in the meaning time, If BB is changed/updated in the optimization, it will
be put into FreshBBs (try do optimizeBlock again).
The new created BB at previous iteration will also put into FreshBBs.
2 For the BBs which not updated at previous iteration, we directly skip it.
Strictly speaking, here may miss some opportunity, but the probability is very
small.
3 For Instructions in single BB, we do optimizeInst for each instruction.
If optimizeInst change the instruction dominator in this BB, rather than break
and go back to optimize the first BB (the old way), we directly iterate
instructions (to do optimizeInst) in this updated BB again (the new way).
What this patch do for small/normal (not huge) function ?
It is same with the Old Algorithm. (NFC)
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129352
