The actual callsite we are adding to doesn't need to be
`willreturn`/`nounwind`, only ever instructions between the callsite
and the return.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156844
We can do this by just querying attribute in the callsite itself. This
is both cleaner code and produces bette results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156843
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
most of the inliner test cases.
The inliner involves a bunch of interesting code and tends to be where
most of the issues I've seen experimenting with the new PM lie. All of
these test cases pass, but I'd like to keep some more thorough coverage
here so doing a fairly blanket enabling.
There are a handful of interesting tests I've not enabled yet because
they're focused on the always inliner, or on functionality that doesn't
(yet) exist in the inliner.
llvm-svn: 290592
If we have a caller that knows a particular argument can never be null, we can exploit this fact while simplifying values in the inline cost analysis. This has the effect of reducing the cost for inlining when a null check is present in the callee, but the value is known non null in the caller. In particular, any dependent control flow can be discounted from the cost estimate.
Note that we use the parameter attributes at the call site to memoize the analysis within the caller's code. The setting of this attribute is done in InstCombine, the inline cost analysis just consumes it. This is intentional and important because we want the inline cost analysis results to be easily cachable themselves. We're not currently doing so, but initial results on LTO indicate this will quickly become important.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9129
llvm-svn: 240828
