Fixes the issue reported at 4b8320868c (commitcomment-114671248).
The extractvalue instructions may still be used by the calling code
in some cases. Rather than trying to figure out which extracts are
safe to remove and which aren't, add them to the worklist so they
will get DCEd by the main loop.
With this patch an undefined mask in a shufflevector will be printed as poison.
This change is done to support the new shufflevector semantics
for undefined mask elements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149210
We were checking for a desirable integer type even when there
is no shift in the transform. This is unnecessary since we
are truncating directly to the destination type.
This removes an extractelt in more cases and seems to make the
canonicalization more uniform overall. There's still a potential
difference between patterns that need a shift vs. trunc-only.
I'm not sure if that is worth keeping at this point, but it can
be adjusted in another step (assuming this change does not cause
trouble).
In the most basic case where I noticed this, we missed a fold
that would have completely removed vector ops from a pattern
like:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/y4Qdte
An extractelt with a constant index which extracts an element from the
two vector operands of a select can be directly folded into a select.
extractelt (select %x, %vec1, %vec2), %const ->
select %x, %vec1[%const], %vec2[%const]
Note: the implementation currently only works for constant vector operands.
Reviewed By: foad, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137934
The basic idea to this is that a) having a single canonical type makes CSE easier, and b) many of our transforms are inconsistent about which types we end up with based on visit order.
I'm restricting this to constants as for non-constants, we'd have to decide whether the simplicity was worth extra instructions. For constants, there are no extra instructions.
We chose the canonical type as i64 arbitrarily. We might consider changing this to something else in the future if we have cause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115387
We already handle more complicated cases like:
extelt (bitcast (inselt poison, X, 0)) --> trunc (lshr X)
But we missed this simpler pattern:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/D55h64 / https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/GKzzRq
This is part of solving:
https://llvm.org/PR52057
I made the transform depend on legal/desirable int type to avoid creating
a shift of an illegal type (for example i128). I'm not sure if that
restriction is actually necessary, but we can change that as a follow-up
if the backend can deal with integer ops on too-wide illegal types.
The pile of AVX512 test changes are all neutral AFAICT - the x86 backend
seems to know how to turn that into the expected "kmov" instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111082
This is a patch that replaces shufflevector and insertelement's placeholder value with poison.
Underlying motivation is to fix the semantics of shufflevector with undef mask to return poison instead
(D93818)
The consensus has been made in the late 2020 via mailing list as well as the thread in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44185 .
This patch is a simple syntactic change to the existing code, hence directly pushed as a commit.
This is the same change as D93990, but for extractelement rather
than insertelement.
> If idx exceeds the length of val for a fixed-length vector, the
> result is a poison value. For a scalable vector, if the value of
> idx exceeds the runtime length of the vector, the result is a
> poison value.
PR45481:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45481
SDAG has an identical transform to this, so there's little
chance of any real-world impact. OTOH, that means we are
effectively sweeping the bug out of sight because poison
exists in codegen too.
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
This is a follow-up to rL343482 / D52439.
This was a pattern that initially caused the commit to be reverted because
the transform requires a bitcast as shown here.
llvm-svn: 343794
These are candidates for the same fold that was implemented in
D52439, but FP types require bitcasting (and that changes the
extra uses profitability calculation).
llvm-svn: 343587
This was originally committed at rL343407, but reverted at
rL343458 because it crashed trying to handle a case where
the destination type is FP. This version of the patch adds
a check for that possibility. Tests added at rL343480.
Original commit message:
This transform is requested for the backend in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39016
...but I figured it was worth doing in IR too, and it's probably
easier to implement here, so that's this patch.
In the simplest case, we are just truncating a scalar value. If the
extract index doesn't correspond to the LSBs of the scalar, then we
have to shift-right before the truncate. Endian-ness makes this tricky,
but hopefully the ASCII-art helps visualize the transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52439
llvm-svn: 343482
The first attempt at this transform:
rL343407
...was reverted:
rL343458
...because it did not handle the case where we bitcast to FP.
The patch was already limited to avoid the case where we
bitcast from FP, but we might want to transform that too.
llvm-svn: 343480
This caused Chromium builds to fail with "Illegal Trunc" assertion.
See https://crbug.com/890723 for repro.
> This transform is requested for the backend in:
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39016
> ...but I figured it was worth doing in IR too, and it's probably
> easier to implement here, so that's this patch.
>
> In the simplest case, we are just truncating a scalar value. If the
> extract index doesn't correspond to the LSBs of the scalar, then we
> have to shift-right before the truncate. Endian-ness makes this tricky,
> but hopefully the ASCII-art helps visualize the transform.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52439
llvm-svn: 343458
This transform is requested for the backend in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39016
...but I figured it was worth doing in IR too, and it's probably
easier to implement here, so that's this patch.
In the simplest case, we are just truncating a scalar value. If the
extract index doesn't correspond to the LSBs of the scalar, then we
have to shift-right before the truncate. Endian-ness makes this tricky,
but hopefully the ASCII-art helps visualize the transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52439
llvm-svn: 343407
In one case, we were handling out of bounds, but not undef indices. In the other, we were handling undef (with the comment making the analogy to out of bounds), but not out of bounds. Be consistent and treat both undef and constant out of bounds indices as producing undefined results.
As a side effect, this also protects instcombine from having to handle large constant indices as we always simplify first.
llvm-svn: 321575
Went to reduce another fuzzer failure to find it's already been fixed, but the test case is slightly different so it's worth adding anyways.
Reduced from oss-fuzz #4768 test case
llvm-svn: 321573
