Handles cases like `X ^ Y == X` / `X disjoint| Y == X`.
Both of these cases have identical logic to the existing `add` case,
so just converting the `add` code to a more general helper.
Proofs: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Htm7peCloses#87706
Instead of relying on known-bits for strictly positive, use the
`isKnownPositive` API. This will use `isKnownNonZero` which is more
accurate.
Closes#88170
There is one notable "regression". This patch replaces the bespoke `or
disjoint` logic we a direct match. This means we fail some
simplification during `instsimplify`.
All the cases we fail in `instsimplify` we do handle in `instcombine`
as we add `disjoint` flags.
Other than that, just some basic cases.
See proofs: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/_-g7C8Closes#86083
As part of the migration to ptradd
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-replacing-getelementptr-with-ptradd/68699),
we need to change the representation of the `inrange` attribute, which
is used for vtable splitting.
Currently, inrange is specified as follows:
```
getelementptr inbounds ({ [4 x ptr], [4 x ptr] }, ptr @vt, i64 0, inrange i32 1, i64 2)
```
The `inrange` is placed on a GEP index, and all accesses must be "in
range" of that index. The new representation is as follows:
```
getelementptr inbounds inrange(-16, 16) ({ [4 x ptr], [4 x ptr] }, ptr @vt, i64 0, i32 1, i64 2)
```
This specifies which offsets are "in range" of the GEP result. The new
representation will continue working when canonicalizing to ptradd
representation:
```
getelementptr inbounds inrange(-16, 16) (i8, ptr @vt, i64 48)
```
The inrange offsets are relative to the return value of the GEP. An
alternative design could make them relative to the source pointer
instead. The result-relative format was chosen on the off-chance that we
want to extend support to non-constant GEPs in the future, in which case
this variant is more expressive.
This implementation "upgrades" the old inrange representation in bitcode
by simply dropping it. This is a very niche feature, and I don't think
trying to upgrade it is worthwhile. Let me know if you disagree.
This code was assuming that the LHS would always be one of
GlobalVariable, BlockAddress or ConstantExpr. However, it can
also be a special constant like dso_local_equivalent or no_cfi.
Make sure this is handled gracefully.
Follow the 2019 rules and order -0 as less than +0 and +0 as greater
than -0. As currently defined this isn't required for the intrinsics,
but is a better QoI.
This will avoid the workaround in libc added by #83158
This is mostly NFC but some output does change due to consistently
inserting into poison rather than undef and using i64 as the index
type for inserts.
Teaching ConstantFoldLoadFromUniformValue that types that are padded in
memory can't be considered as uniform.
Using the big hammer to prevent optimizations when loading from a
constant for which DataLayout::typeSizeEqualsStoreSize would return
false.
Main problem solved would be something like this:
store i17 -1, ptr %p, align 4
%v = load i8, ptr %p, align 1
If for example the i17 occupies 32 bits in memory, then LLVM IR doesn't
really tell where the padding goes. And even if we assume that the 15
most significant bits are padding, then they should be considered as
undefined (even if LLVM backend typically would pad with zeroes).
Anyway, for a big-endian target the load would read those most
significant bits, which aren't guaranteed to be one's. So it would be
wrong to constant fold the load as returning -1.
If LLVM IR had been more explicit about the placement of padding, then
we could allow the constant fold of the load in the example, but only
for little-endian.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/81793
Fold gc.relocate of undef and null to undef and null respectively.
Similar transform is currently done by instcombine, but there is no
reason to not include it here as well.
This patch merges the logic of `cannotBeOrderedLessThanZeroImpl` into
`computeKnownFPClass` to improve the signbit inference.
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Arsenault <arsenm2@gmail.com>
The returned attribute can be used when it is possible to
"losslessly bitcast" between the argument and return type,
including between two vector types.
computeKnownBits() would crash in this case, isKnownNonZero()
would potentially produce a miscompile.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/74722.
If both icmps have the same operands and the RHS is constant, we
would currently go into the isImpliedCondMatchingOperands() code
path, instead of the isImpliedCondCommonOperandWithConstants()
path. Both are correct, but the latter can produce more accurate
results if the implication is dependent on the sign.
This reverts commit 96a0d714d58e48c363ee6abbbcdfd7a6ce646ac1.
Avoid assert with dynamic denormal-fp-math We don't recognize compares
with 0 as an exact class test if we don't know the denormal mode. We could
try to do better here, but it's probably not worth it.
Fixes asserts reported after 1adce7d8e47e2438f99f91607760b825e5e3cc37
When folding urem instructions we can end up not recognizing that
the output will always be 0 due to Value*s being different, despite
generating the same data (in this case, 2 different calls to vscale).
This patch recognizes the (x << N) & (add (x << M), -1) pattern that
instcombine replaces urem with after the two vscale calls have been
reduced to one via CSE, then replaces with 0 when x is a power of 2
and N >= M.
This causes asserts to fire:
llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp:4262:
std::tuple<Value *, FPClassTest, FPClassTest> llvm::fcmpImpliesClass(CmpInst::Predicate, const Function &, Value *, const APFloat *, bool):
Assertion `(RHSClass == fcPosNormal || RHSClass == fcNegNormal || RHSClass == fcPosSubnormal || RHSClass == fcNegSubnormal) && "should have been recognized as an exact class test"' failed.
See comments on the PR.
> Previously we could recognize exact class tests performed by
> an fcmp with special values (0s, infs and smallest normal).
> Expand this to recognize the implied classes by a compare with a general
> constant. e.g. fcmp ogt x, 1 implies positive and non-0.
>
> The API should be better merged with fcmpToClassTest but that
> made the diff way bigger, will try to do that in a future
> patch.
This reverts commit dc3faf0ed0e3f1ea9e435a006167d9649f865da1.
Previously we could recognize exact class tests performed by
an fcmp with special values (0s, infs and smallest normal).
Expand this to recognize the implied classes by a compare with a general
constant. e.g. fcmp ogt x, 1 implies positive and non-0.
The API should be better merged with fcmpToClassTest but that
made the diff way bigger, will try to do that in a future
patch.
