As part of the migration to ptradd
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-replacing-getelementptr-with-ptradd/68699),
we need to change the representation of the `inrange` attribute, which
is used for vtable splitting.
Currently, inrange is specified as follows:
```
getelementptr inbounds ({ [4 x ptr], [4 x ptr] }, ptr @vt, i64 0, inrange i32 1, i64 2)
```
The `inrange` is placed on a GEP index, and all accesses must be "in
range" of that index. The new representation is as follows:
```
getelementptr inbounds inrange(-16, 16) ({ [4 x ptr], [4 x ptr] }, ptr @vt, i64 0, i32 1, i64 2)
```
This specifies which offsets are "in range" of the GEP result. The new
representation will continue working when canonicalizing to ptradd
representation:
```
getelementptr inbounds inrange(-16, 16) (i8, ptr @vt, i64 48)
```
The inrange offsets are relative to the return value of the GEP. An
alternative design could make them relative to the source pointer
instead. The result-relative format was chosen on the off-chance that we
want to extend support to non-constant GEPs in the future, in which case
this variant is more expressive.
This implementation "upgrades" the old inrange representation in bitcode
by simply dropping it. This is a very niche feature, and I don't think
trying to upgrade it is worthwhile. Let me know if you disagree.
This code was assuming that the LHS would always be one of
GlobalVariable, BlockAddress or ConstantExpr. However, it can
also be a special constant like dso_local_equivalent or no_cfi.
Make sure this is handled gracefully.
Follow the 2019 rules and order -0 as less than +0 and +0 as greater
than -0. As currently defined this isn't required for the intrinsics,
but is a better QoI.
This will avoid the workaround in libc added by #83158
This is mostly NFC but some output does change due to consistently
inserting into poison rather than undef and using i64 as the index
type for inserts.
Teaching ConstantFoldLoadFromUniformValue that types that are padded in
memory can't be considered as uniform.
Using the big hammer to prevent optimizations when loading from a
constant for which DataLayout::typeSizeEqualsStoreSize would return
false.
Main problem solved would be something like this:
store i17 -1, ptr %p, align 4
%v = load i8, ptr %p, align 1
If for example the i17 occupies 32 bits in memory, then LLVM IR doesn't
really tell where the padding goes. And even if we assume that the 15
most significant bits are padding, then they should be considered as
undefined (even if LLVM backend typically would pad with zeroes).
Anyway, for a big-endian target the load would read those most
significant bits, which aren't guaranteed to be one's. So it would be
wrong to constant fold the load as returning -1.
If LLVM IR had been more explicit about the placement of padding, then
we could allow the constant fold of the load in the example, but only
for little-endian.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/81793
Remove support for the fptrunc, fpext, fptoui, fptosi, uitofp and sitofp
constant expressions. All places creating them have been removed
beforehand, so this just removes the APIs and uses of these constant
expressions in tests.
With this, the only remaining FP operation that still has constant
expression support is fcmp.
This is part of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
If a pointer isn't a constant expression, global or block address,
it's not guaranteed to be a null pointer. It can also be a no_cfi
or dso_local_equivalent constant.
Remove support for zext and sext constant expressions. All places
creating them have been removed beforehand, so this just removes the
APIs and uses of these constant expressions in tests.
There is some additional cleanup that can be done on top of this, e.g.
we can remove the ZExtInst vs ZExtOperator footgun.
This is part of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
There are many tests that specify a target triple/CPU flags but no
DataLayout which can lead to IR being generated that has unusual
behaviour. This commit attempts to use the default DataLayout based
on the relevant flags if there is no explicit override on the command
line or in the IR file.
One thing that is not currently possible to differentiate from a missing
datalayout `target datalayout = ""` in the IR file since the current
APIs don't allow detecting this case. If it is considered useful to
support this case (instead of passing "-data-layout=" on the command
line), I can change IR parsers to track whether they have seen such a
directive and change the callback type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141060
Reapply after D156401, which stops PatternMatch from recognizing
binop constant expressions, which should avoid the infinite loops
and assertion failures this patch previously exposed.
-----
In preparation for removing support for and/or expressions, mark
them as undesirable. As such, we will no longer implicitly create
such expressions, but they still exist.
This reapplies the change for and, but also marks or as undesirable
at the same time. Only handling one of them can cause infinite
combine loops due to the asymmetric handling.
-----
In preparation for removing support for and/or expressions, mark
them as undesirable. As such, we will no longer implicitly create
such expressions, but they still exist.
This reverts commit 086ee99564afbb11449c08ea2e094f7f49fadde5.
This patch causes an infinite loop when building arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c in
the Linux kernel. See the comment in Phabricator for a reduced
reproducer: https://reviews.llvm.org/rG086ee99564afbb11449c08ea2e094f7f49fadde5
Reapply after fixing an issue in canonicalizeLogicFirst() exposed
by this change (218f97578b26f7a89f7f8ed0748c31ef0181f80a).
-----
In preparation for removing support for and expressions, mark them
as undesirable. As such, we will no longer implicitly create such
expressions, but they still exist.
This reverts commit f8a36d8c3e264c4fccf8058e699201a452ea7bb7.
I believe this is causing an assertion failure on the
sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot:
clang++: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:578: decltype(auto) llvm::cast(From *) [To = llvm::BinaryOperator, From = llvm::Value]: Assertion `isa<To>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!"' failed.
#10 0x000055bdd7e82408 canonicalizeLogicFirst(llvm::BinaryOperator&, llvm::IRBuilder<llvm::TargetFolder, llvm::IRBuilderCallbackInserter>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp:2131:5
#11 0x000055bdd7e80183 llvm::InstCombinerImpl::visitAnd(llvm::BinaryOperator&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp:2661:20
Likely the code is encountering a constant expression in a case it
didn't before.
In preparation for removing support for add expressions, mark them
as undesirable. As such, we will no longer implicitly create such
expressions, but they still exist.
This is a follow-up to b71edfaa4ec3c998aadb35255ce2f60bba2940b0
since I forgot the lit.local.cfg files in that one.
Reformatting is done with `black`.
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.
If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.
RFC Thread below:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Reviewed By: barannikov88, kwk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150762
Instcombine prefers this canonical form (see getPreferredVectorIndex),
as does IRBuilder when passing the index as an integer so we may as
well use the prefered form from creation.
NOTE: All test changes are mechanical with nothing else expected
beyond a change of index type from i32 to i64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140983
Given a poison constant as input, the dyn_cast to a ConstantInt would
fail so we would fall through to the generic code that attempts to fold
each element of the input vectors. The inputs to these intrinsics are
not vectors though, leading to a compile time crash. Instead bail out
properly for poison values by returning nullptr. This doesn't try to
define what poison means for these intrinsics.
Fixes#56945
The div/rem constant expressions are going away in D129148. Convert
some tests to use InstSimplify instead, to show that the constant
folding still happens.
Previously left these behind due to the required instruction
renumbering, drop them now. This more accurately represents
opaque pointer input IR.
Also drop duplicate opaque pointer check lines in one SROA test.
With opaque pointers, we end up merging these GEPs and dropping
the inrange attribute (in the last two cases). This did not happen
previously, because typed pointers use less powerful GEP folding logic.
I'm a bit unsure whether this is something we need to be concerned
about or not. I believe that generally our stance is that we should
perform folds even if this requires losing poison-generating flags
like inrange.
We can either a) accept this as-is, b) try to inhibit folding if it
requires dropping inrange or c) try to fold to poison if we know
that inrange is going to be violated.
For now, we accept it as-is.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127503
The only interesting test change is in @PR31262, where the following
fold is now performed, while it previously was not:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/a5Qmr6
llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/ConstProp/gep.ll has not been
updated, because there is a tradeoff between folding and inrange
preservation there that we may want to discuss.
Updates have been performed using:
https://gist.github.com/nikic/98357b71fd67756b0f064c9517b62a34
Most of insertelement constant folding is blocked if the vector type
is scalable. I believe we can make an exception for inserting null
into an all zeros vector.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123413
A more general enhancement needs to add tests and make sure
that intrinsics that return structs are correct. There are also
target-specific intrinsics, and I'm not sure what behavior is
expected for those.
A more general enhancement needs to add tests and make sure
that intrinsics that return structs are correct. There are also
target-specific intrinsics, and I'm not sure what behavior is
expected for those.
Use the new PM syntax when specifying the pipeline in regression
tests previously running
"opt -newgvn ..."
Instead we now do
"opt -passes=newgvn ..."
Notice that this also changes the aa-pipeline to become the default
aa-pipeline instead of just basic-aa. Since these tests haven't been
explicitly requesting basic-aa in the past (compared to the test cases
updated in a separate patch involving "-basic-aa -newgvn") it is
assumed that the exact aa-pipeline isn't important for the validity
of the test cases. An alternative could have been to add
-aa-pipeline=basic-aa as well to the run lines, but that might just
add clutter in case the test cases do not care about the aa-pipeline.
This is another step to move away from the legacy PM syntax when
specifying passes in opt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118341
