There are many tests that specify a target triple/CPU flags but no
DataLayout which can lead to IR being generated that has unusual
behaviour. This commit attempts to use the default DataLayout based
on the relevant flags if there is no explicit override on the command
line or in the IR file.
One thing that is not currently possible to differentiate from a missing
datalayout `target datalayout = ""` in the IR file since the current
APIs don't allow detecting this case. If it is considered useful to
support this case (instead of passing "-data-layout=" on the command
line), I can change IR parsers to track whether they have seen such a
directive and change the callback type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141060
1.Fix the last runtime issue as some sequent comparisons need be spilted.
For the origin equal comparisons chain, the new spilted Icmp chain will
still be end with equal, while for the new not-equal comparisons chain,
the new spilted Icmp chain will still be end with equal, so should address
this carefully, see detail wih case partial_sequent_ne
2. Fix the mismatch of last link comparison
Thanks for @aeubanks, @glandium and @ayzhao report the runtime issue
and carefully examine.
Fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59740.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141188
This is a follow-up to b71edfaa4ec3c998aadb35255ce2f60bba2940b0
since I forgot the lit.local.cfg files in that one.
Reformatting is done with `black`.
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.
If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.
RFC Thread below:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Reviewed By: barannikov88, kwk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150762
Fix the last runtime issue as some sequent comparisons need be spilted.
For the origin equal comparisons chain, the new spilted Icmp chain will
still be end with equal, while for the new not-equal comparisons chain,
the new spilted Icmp chain will still be end with equal, so should address
this carefully, see detail wih case partial_sequent_ne
Thanks for @aeubanks, @glandium and @ayzhao report the runtime issue
and carefully examine.
Fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59740.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141188
Fix the last runtime issue as some sequent comparisons need be spilted.
For the origin equal comparisons chain, the new spilted Icmp chain will
still be end with equal, while for the new not-equal comparisons chain,
the new spilted Icmp chain will still be end with equal, so should address
this carefully, see detail wih case partial_sequent_ne
Thanks for @aeubanks, @glandium and @ayzhao report the runtime issue
and carefully examine.
Fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59740.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141188
Use clone to keep the metadata, the issue is reported
by aeubanks on D141188.
Reviewed By: nikic, paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146702
Many uses of getIntPtrType() were using that type to calculate the
neened type for GEP offset arguments. However, some time ago,
DataLayout was extended to support pointers where the size of the
pointer is not equal to the size of the values used to index it.
Much code was already migrated to, for example, use getIndexSizeInBits
instead of getPtrSizeInBits, but some rewrites still used
getIntPtrType() to get the type for GEP offsets.
This commit changes uses of getIntPtrType() to getIndexType() where
they are involved in a GEP-related calculation.
In at least one case (bounds check insertion) this resolves a compiler
crash that the new test added here would previously trigger.
This commit does not impact
- C library-related rewriting (memcpy()), which are operating under
the assumption that intptr_t == size_t. While all the mechanisms for
breaking this assumption now exist, doing so is outside the scope of
this commit.
- Code generation and below. Note that the use of getIntPtrType() in
CodeGenPrepare will be changed in a future commit.
- Usage of getIntPtrType() in any backend
Depends on D143435
Reviewed By: arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143437
Fix the last runtime issue as some sequent comparisons need be spilted.
For the origin equal comparisons chain, the new spilted Icmp chain will
still be end with equal, while for the new not-equal comparisons chain,
the new spilted Icmp chain will still be end with equal, so should address
this carefully, see detail wih case partial_sequent_ne.
Thanks for @glandium and @ayzhao report the runtime issue and carefully
examine.
Fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59740.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141188
This reverts commit 74ad19c25d7217d8f580a21d12fd4c784a1a0094.
test unittests/ProfileData/ProfileDataTests fails when built with
optimisations level -O1 with clang including this patch.
Some calls to GEPOperator::accumulateConstantOffset(APInt) passed the
pointer bitwidth as the width of the APInt, while the function asserts
that the width of its argument is equal to the index width of the GEP
pointer input. These values are almost always the same, so mixing up
which call to use doesn't usually cause issues. However, when dealing
with data layouts where these values are different, the passes tested
here can crash.
This will be fixed in D143437 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144673
Recommit without changes over 53abe3ff66a54117308352d379837c7d3229f8d6,
which addressed the cause of the reported crash.
-----
With opaque pointers, the zero-offset load will generally not use
a GEP. Allow a direct load without GEP, which is treated the same
way as a zero-offset GEP.
Use the overload that support moving into an empty block. I don't
think that this situation can occur right now, but it can happen
with the change from e7fb1c15cb85d748c1c4fdd5a2eb5613ec7bef1d,
and the test is derived from the issue reported there.
With opaque pointers, the zero-offset load will generally not use
a GEP. Allow a direct load without GEP, which is treated the same
way as a zero-offset GEP.
MergeICmps will currently sort (by offset) all comparisons in a chain,
including those that do not get merged. This is problematic in two ways:
* We may end up moving the original first block into the middle of
the chain, in which case the "extra work" instructions will also
be in the middle of the chain, resulting in invalid IR
(reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D108782#3005583).
* Reordering branches is generally not legal, because it may
introduce branch on poison, which is UB (PR51845). The merging
done by MergeICmps is legal as long as we assume that memcmp()
works on frozen memory, but the reordering of unmerged comparisons
is definitely incorrect (without inserting freeze instructions),
so we should avoid it.
There are easier ways to fix the first issue, but I figured it was
worthwhile to do this properly to also fix the second one. What we
now do is to restore the original relative order of (potentially
merged) comparisons.
I took the liberty of dropping the MERGEICMPS_DOT_ON functionality,
because it would be more awkward to implement now (as the before and
after representation is different) and it doesn't seem terribly
useful nowadays.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110024
This is another followup to D106591. Even if there is an
instruction that clobbers one of the loads, this doesn't matter if
it happens before the loads. Those instructions aren't affected by
the transform at all.
The gep-references-bb.ll is modified to preserve the spirit of the
test, as the store to @g no longer impacts the transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108782
IIUC we can't emit `memcmp` between pointers in addressspaces,
doing so will trigger an assertion since the signature of the memcmp
will not match it's arguments (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48661).
This PR disables the attempt to merge icmps,
when the pointer is in an addressspace.
Reviewed By: #julialang, vtjnash
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94813
This is a followup to D106591. MergeICmps currently only allows
sinking the loads past either instructions that don't write to
memory at all, or simple loads/stores that don't modify the memory
the loads access.
The "simple loads/stores" part of this check doesn't seem necessary
to me -- AA isModRef() already accurately models any operation
that may clobber the memory. For example, in the adjusted test case
the transform is still fine if the call to @foo() isn't readonly,
but inaccessiblememonly -- in both cases, the call cannot modify
the loaded memory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108517
The check for sinking instructions past the load + cmp sequence
currently checks for side-effects, which includes writing to memory
and unwinding. However, I don't believe we care about sinking the
instructions past an unwind (as they don't have any side-effects
themselves).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106591
There's a potential change in dereferenceability attribute semantics in the nearish future. See llvm-dev thread "RFC: Decomposing deref(N) into deref(N) + nofree" and D99100 for context.
This change simply adds appropriate attributes to tests to keep transform logic exercised under both old and new/proposed semantics. Note that for many of these cases, O3 would infer exactly these attributes on the test IR.
This change handles the idiomatic pattern of a dereferenceable object being passed to a call which can not free that memory. There's a couple other tests which need more one-off attention, they'll be handled in another change.
- When emitting libcalls, do not only pass the calling convention from the
function prototype but also the attributes.
- Do not pass attributes from e.g. libc memcpy to llvm.memcpy.
Review: Reid Kleckner, Eli Friedman, Arthur Eubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103992
Since d6de1e1a71406c75a4ea4d5a2fe84289f07ea3a1, no attributes is quivalent to
setting attribute to false.
This is a preliminary commit for https://reviews.llvm.org/D99080
We were not correctly splitting a blocks for chains of length 1.
Before that change, additional instructions for blocks in chains of
length 1 were not split off from the block before removing (this was
done correctly for chains of longer size).
If this first block contained an instruction referenced elsewhere,
deleting the block, would result in invalidation of the produced value.
This caused a miscompile which motivated D92297 (before D17993,
nonnull and dereferenceable attributed were not added so MergeICmps were
not triggered.) The new test gep-references-bb.ll demonstrate the issue.
The regression was introduced in
rG0efadbbcdeb82f5c14f38fbc2826107063ca48b2.
This supersedes D92364.
Test case by MaskRay (Fangrui Song).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92375
With a fix for PR41917: The predecessor list was changing under our feet.
- for (BasicBlock *Pred : predecessors(EntryBlock_)) {
+ while (!pred_empty(EntryBlock_)) {
+ BasicBlock* const Pred = *pred_begin(EntryBlock_);
llvm-svn: 361009
