For the longest time we used `AAValueSimplify` and
`genericValueTraversal` to determine "potential values". This was
problematic for many reasons:
- We recomputed the result a lot as there was no caching for the 9
locations calling `genericValueTraversal`.
- We added the idea of "intra" vs. "inter" procedural simplification
only as an afterthought. `genericValueTraversal` did offer an option
but `AAValueSimplify` did not. Thus, we might end up with "too much"
simplification in certain situations and then gave up on it.
- Because `genericValueTraversal` was not a real `AA` we ended up with
problems like the infinite recursion bug (#54981) as well as code
duplication.
This patch introduces `AAPotentialValues` and replaces the
`AAValueSimplify` uses with it. `genericValueTraversal` is folded into
`AAPotentialValues` as are the instruction simplifications performed in
`AAValueSimplify` before. We further distinguish "intra" and "inter"
procedural simplification now.
`AAValueSimplify` was not deleted as we haven't ported the
re-materialization of instructions yet. There are other differences over
the former handling, e.g., we may not fold trivially foldable
instructions right now, e.g., `add i32 1, 1` is not folded to `i32 2`
but if an operand would be simplified to `i32 1` we would fold it still.
We are also even more aware of function/SCC boundaries in CGSCC passes,
which is good.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54981
When we run the CGSCC pass we should only invest time on the SCC. We can
initialize AAs with information from the module slice but we should not
update those AAs. We make an exception for are call site of the SCC as
they are helpful providing information for the SCC.
Minor modifications to pointer privatization allow us to perform it even
in the CGSCC pass, similar to ArgumentPromotion.
When we run the CGSCC pass we should only invest time on the SCC. We can
initialize AAs with information from the module slice but we should not
update those AAs.
The metadata added in D102361 introduces a module flag that we can check
to determine if the module was compiled with `-fopenmp` enables. We can
now check for the precense of this instead of scanning the call graph
for OpenMP runtime functions.
Depends on D102361
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102423
Summary:
This patch registers OpenMPOpt as a Module pass in addition to a CGSCC
pass. This is so certain optimzations that are sensitive to intact
call-sites can happen before inlining. The old `openmpopt` pass name is
changed to `openmp-opt-cgscc` and `openmp-opt` calls the Module pass.
The current module pass only runs a single check but will be expanded in
the future.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99202
The OpenMP 5.1 assumptions `no_openmp` and `no_openmp_routines` allow us
to ignore calls that would otherwise prevent ICV tracking.
Once we track more ICVs we might need to distinguish the ones that could
be impacted even with `no_openmp_routines`.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92050
When checking call sites, give special handling to indirect call, as the
callee may be unknown and can lead to nullptr dereference later. Assume
conservatively that the ICV always changes in such case.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87104
The problem with module slice has been addressed in D86319
Introduce two new AAs. AAICVTrackerFunctionReturned which checks if a
function can have a unique ICV value after it is finished, and
AAICVCallSiteReturned which checks AAICVTrackerFunctionReturned for a
call site. This enables us to check the value of a call and if it
changes the ICV. This also changes the approach in
`getReplacementValues()` to a worklist-based approach so we can explore
all relevant BBs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85544
This commits breaks certain OpenMP codes (on power) because it expanded
the Attributor scope without telling the Attributor about the SCC
extend. See: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85544#2227611
This reverts commit b0b32e649011d9a60165b9b53eb2764b7da9c8ca.
Introduce two new AAs. AAICVTrackerFunctionReturned which checks if a
function can have a unique ICV value after it is finished, and
AAICVCallSiteReturned which checks AAICVTrackerFunctionReturned for a
call site. This enables us to check the value of a call and if it
changes the ICV. This also changes the approach in
`getReplacementValues()` to a worklist-based approach so we can explore
all relevant BBs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85544
This reverts commit 1d542f0ca83fa1411d6501a8d088450d83abd5b8.
`recollectUses()` is added to prevent looking at dead uses after
Attributor run.
This is the first and most basic ICV Tracking implementation. For this
first version, we only support deduplication within the same BB.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, JonChesterfield, hamax97, jhuber6, uenoku,
baziotis, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81788
There appears to be some kind of memory corruption/use-after-free/etc
going on here. In particular, in `OpenMPOpt::deleteParallelRegions()`,
in `DeleteCallCB()`, `CI` is garbage.
WIll post reproducer in the original review.
This reverts commit 6c4a5e9257bac022ffe60e466686ba7fc96ffd1a.
This is the first and most basic ICV Tracking implementation. For this
first version, we only support deduplication within the same BB.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, JonChesterfield, hamax97, jhuber6, uenoku,
baziotis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81788
Summary: Couple of tests to showcase what will be done and what to expect with ICV tracking.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, JonChesterfield
Subscribers: yaxunl, guansong, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81114
