This reverts commit a4d5fd4d2ee9470e55345a9540f6b6fb6faf66e1.
The above commit breaks greendragon lldb bots:
Link to failing builds:
https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/63300/https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/as-lldb-cmake/10345/
I found this PR to be the offending one after using git bisect with the
cmake invocation:
cmake -G Ninja ../llvm -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
-DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=ON
'-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86;ARM;AArch64'
-DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS:BOOL=TRUE
-DLLVM_ENABLE_MODULES=On
-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS='clang;lld;lldb;cross-project-tests'
-DLLVM_VERSION_PATCH=99
'-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=libcxx;libcxxabi;compiler-rt'
and running
ninja lib/CodeGen/CMakeFiles/LLVMCodeGen.dir/CodeGenPassBuilder.cpp.o
Just copy the `runOnFunction` method from `SafeStackLegacyPass` and
remove the workaround for computing analysis lazily, the analysis result
in new pass manager is computed lazily by default.
This is a follow-up to b71edfaa4ec3c998aadb35255ce2f60bba2940b0
since I forgot the lit.local.cfg files in that one.
Reformatting is done with `black`.
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.
If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.
RFC Thread below:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Reviewed By: barannikov88, kwk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150762
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
Instead of asserting that the function doesn't have any unreachable
code, just ignore it for the purpose of computing liveness.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51070
llvm-svn: 340456
The Fuchsia ABI defines slots from the thread pointer where the
stack-guard value for stack-protector, and the unsafe stack pointer
for safe-stack, are stored. This parallels the Android ABI support.
Patch by Roland McGrath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30237
llvm-svn: 296081
Both AArch64 and ARM support llvm.<arch>.thread.pointer intrinsics that
just return the thread pointer. I have a pending patch that does the same
for SystemZ (D19054), and there are many more targets that could benefit
from one.
This patch merges the ARM and AArch64 intrinsics into a single target
independent one that will also be used by subsequent targets.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19098
llvm-svn: 266818
Add StackProtector to SafeStack. This adds limited protection against
data corruption in the caller frame. Current implementation treats
all stack protector levels as -fstack-protector-all.
llvm-svn: 266004
Android libc provides a fixed TLS slot for the unsafe stack pointer,
and this change implements direct access to that slot on AArch64 via
__builtin_thread_pointer() + offset.
This change also moves more code into TargetLowering and its
target-specific subclasses to get rid of target-specific codegen
in SafeStackPass.
This change does not touch the ARM backend because ARM lowers
builting_thread_pointer as aeabi_read_tp, which is not available
on Android.
The previous iteration of this change was reverted in r250461. This
version leaves the generic, compiler-rt based implementation in
SafeStack.cpp instead of moving it to TargetLoweringBase in order to
allow testing without a TargetMachine.
llvm-svn: 251324
Android libc provides a fixed TLS slot for the unsafe stack pointer,
and this change implements direct access to that slot on AArch64 via
__builtin_thread_pointer() + offset.
This change also moves more code into TargetLowering and its
target-specific subclasses to get rid of target-specific codegen
in SafeStackPass.
This change does not touch the ARM backend because ARM lowers
builting_thread_pointer as aeabi_read_tp, which is not available
on Android.
llvm-svn: 250456
Add two new ways of accessing the unsafe stack pointer:
* At a fixed offset from the thread TLS base. This is very similar to
StackProtector cookies, but we plan to extend it to other backends
(ARM in particular) soon. Bionic-side implementation here:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/170988.
* Via a function call, as a fallback for platforms that provide
neither a fixed TLS slot, nor a reasonable TLS implementation (i.e.
not emutls).
This is a re-commit of a change in r248357 that was reverted in
r248358.
llvm-svn: 248405
