2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hongtao Yu
07846e3387 [CSSPGO][PriorityInliner] Do not use block weight to drive callsite inlining.
The priority-based inliner currenlty uses block count combined with callee entry count to drive callsite inlining. This doesn't work well with LTO where postlink inlining is driven by prelink-annotated block count which could be based on the merge of all context profiles. I'm fixing it by using callee profile entry count only which should be context-sensitive.

I'm seeing 0.2% perf improvment for one of our internal large benchmarks with probe-based non-CS profile.

Reviewed By: wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120784
2022-03-01 18:43:19 -08:00
Hongtao Yu
de40f6d623 [CSSPGO] Process functions in a top-down order on a dynamic call graph.
Functions are currently processed by the sample profiler loader in a top-down order defined by the static call graph. The order is being adjusted to be a top-down order based on the input context-sensitive profile. One benefit is that the processing order of caller and callee in one SCC would follow the context order in the profile to favor more inlining. Another benefit is that the processing order of caller and callee through an indirect call (which is not on the static call graph) can be honored which in turn allows for more inlining.

The profile top-down order for SCC is also extended to support non-CS profiles.

Two switches `-mllvm -use-profile-indirect-call-edges` and `-mllvm -use-profile-top-down-order` are being introduced.

Reviewed By: wmi

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95988
2021-02-11 12:36:59 -08:00