When generating snippets for AArch64 with --opcode-index=-1, the code
generator asserts on opcodes that are not supported according to CPU
features.
The same assertion can be triggered even when generating a serial
snippet for a supported opcode if SERIAL_VIA_NON_MEMORY_INSTR execution
mode is used and an unsupported instruction is chosen as the "other
instruction". Unlike the first case, this one may result in flaky
failures because the other instruction is randomly chosen from the
instructions suitable for serializing execution.
This patch adjusts TableGen emitter for *GenInstrInfo.inc to make
possible to query for opcode availability instead of just asserting on
unsupported ones.
~~
Huawei RRI, OS Lab
Reviewed By: courbet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146303
When trying to measure latency of certain opcodes, e.g.
`./bin/llvm-exegesis --opcode-name=BT32ri8 --mode=latency --repetition-mode=loop --benchmarks-file=- --max-configs-per-opcode=65536`,
we'd pick such an aliasing instruction, and such an aliasing registers,
that would alias with forbidden registers.
And in particular with loop counter in `loop` repetition mode,
which made the measurements never finish.
This does not address all such cases, only the most obvious one.
The added test case fails without the patch.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59441
Some instructions defined in table-gen files sets usesCustomInserter
bit, which means it has to be lowered by target code and isn't actually
valid instruction at MC level. So we should treat them like pseudo
instructions.
Reviewed By: gchatelet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94898
Doing a random assignment assigns both tested (forward) and back-to-back
(backward) instructions.
When none of the tested instruction and back-to-back instruction have
implicit aliasing, we're currently trying to do a random register
asignment twice.
Fix this (see PR26418).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90380
Summary:
Currently, we only have nice exploration for LEA instruction,
while for the rest, we rely on `randomizeUnsetVariables()`
to sometimes generate something interesting.
While that works, it isn't very reliable in coverage :)
Here, i'm making an assumption that while we may want to explore
multi-instruction configs, we are most interested in the
characteristics of the main instruction we were asked about.
Which we can do, by taking the existing `randomizeMCOperand()`,
and turning it on it's head - instead of relying on it to randomly fill
one of the interesting values, let's pregenerate all the possible interesting
values for the variable, and then generate as much `InstructionTemplate`
combinations of these possible values for variables as needed/possible.
Of course, that requires invasive changes to no longer pass just the
naked `Instruction`, but sometimes partially filled `InstructionTemplate`.
As it can be seen from the test, this allows us to explore
`X86::OperandType::OPERAND_COND_CODE` for instructions
that take such an operand.
I'm hoping this will greatly simplify exploration.
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: gchatelet
Subscribers: orodley, mgorny, sdardis, tschuett, jrtc27, atanasyan, mstojanovic, andreadb, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74156
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Since some instruction types aren't allowed as the main instruction also
don't allow them for aliasing instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73220
The addition of `inverse_throughput` mode highlighted the disjointedness
of snippet generators and benchmark runners because it used the
`UopsSnippetGenerator` with the `LatencyBenchmarkRunner`.
To keep the code consistent tie the snippet generators to
parallelization/serialization rather than their benchmark runners.
Renaming `LatencySnippetGenerator` -> `SerialSnippetGenerator`.
Renaming `UopsSnippetGenerator` -> `ParallelSnippetGenerator`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72928
