Transform interfaces are implemented, direction or via extensions, in
libraries belonging to multiple other dialects. Those dialects don't
need to depend on the non-interface part of the transform dialect, which
includes the growing number of ops and transitive dependency footprint.
Split out the interfaces into a separate library. This in turn requires
flipping the dependency from the interface on the dialect that has crept
in because both co-existed in one library. The interface shouldn't
depend on the transform dialect either.
As a consequence of splitting, the capability of the interpreter to
automatically walk the payload IR to identify payload ops of a certain
kind based on the type used for the entry point symbol argument is
disabled. This is a good move by itself as it simplifies the interpreter
logic. This functionality can be trivially replaced by a
`transform.structured.match` operation.
All `apply` functions now have a `TransformRewriter &` parameter. This rewriter should be used to modify the IR. It has a `TrackingListener` attached and updates the internal handle-payload mappings based on rewrites.
Implementations no longer need to create their own `TrackingListener` and `IRRewriter`. Error checking is integrated into `applyTransform`. Tracking listener errors are reported only for ops with the `ReportTrackingListenerFailuresOpTrait` trait attached, allowing for a gradual migration. Furthermore, errors can be silenced with an op attribute.
Additional API will be added to `TransformRewriter` in subsequent revisions. This revision just adds an "empty" `TransformRewriter` class and updates all `apply` implementations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152427
The transform dialect has been around for a while and is sufficiently
stable at this point. Add the first three chapters of the tutorial
describing its usage and extension.
Reviewed By: springerm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151491
