* Removes the half-completed prior attempt at region/block mutation in favor of new approach to ownership.
* Will re-add mutation more correctly in a follow-on.
* Eliminates the detached state on blocks and regions, simplifying the ownership hierarchy.
* Adds both iterator and index based access at each level.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87982
* Per thread https://llvm.discourse.group/t/revisiting-ownership-and-lifetime-in-the-python-bindings/1769
* Reworks contexts so it is always possible to get back to a py::object that holds the reference count for an arbitrary MlirContext.
* Retrofits some of the base classes to automatically take a reference to the context, elimintating keep_alives.
* More needs to be done, as discussed, when moving on to the operations/blocks/regions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87886
This patch provides C API for MLIR affine map.
- Implement C API for AffineMap class.
- Add Utils.h to include/mlir/CAPI/, and move the definition of the CallbackOstream to Utils.h to make sure mlirAffineMapPrint work correct.
- Add TODO for exposing the C API related to AffineExpr and mutable affine map.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87617
* This is just enough to create regions/blocks and iterate over them.
* Does not yet implement the preferred iteration strategy (python pseudo containers).
* Refinements need to come after doing basic mappings of operations and values so that the whole hierarchy can be used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86683
Provide C API for MLIR standard attributes. Since standard attributes live
under lib/IR in core MLIR, place the C APIs in the IR library as well (standard
ops will go in a separate library).
Affine map and integer set attributes are only exposed as placeholder types
with IsA support due to the lack of C APIs for the corresponding types.
Integer and floating point attribute APIs expecting APInt and APFloat are not
exposed pending decision on how to support APInt and APFloat.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86143
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.
To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.
1) For passes, you need to override the method:
virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry ®istry) const {}
and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.
2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.
3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:
mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
registry.insert<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
registry.insert<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();
Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:
mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);
4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.
To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.
1) For passes, you need to override the method:
virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry ®istry) const {}
and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.
2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.
3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:
mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
registry.insert<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
registry.insert<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();
Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:
mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);
4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.
To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.
1) For passes, you need to override the method:
virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry ®istry) const {}
and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.
2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.
3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:
mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
mlir::registerDialect<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
mlir::registerDialect<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();
Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:
mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);
4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
Provide C API for MLIR standard types. Since standard types live under lib/IR
in core MLIR, place the C APIs in the IR library as well (standard ops will go
into a separate library). This also defines a placeholder for affine maps that
are necessary to construct a memref, but are not yet exposed to the C API.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86094
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from (Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial, the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others (linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the optimization pipeline enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
This library does not depend on all the dialects, conceptually. This is
changing the recently introduced `mlirContextLoadAllDialects()` function
to not call `registerAllDialects()` itself, which aligns it better with
the C++ code anyway (and this is deprecated and will be removed soon).
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from (Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial, the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others (linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the optimization pipeline enabled.
Provide printing functions for most IR objects in C API (except Region that
does not have a `print` function, and Module that is expected to be printed as
Operation instead). The printing is based on a callback that is called with
chunks of the string representation and forwarded user-defined data.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident, Jing, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85748
Using intptr_t is a consensus for MLIR C API, but the change was missing
from 75f239e9756b (that was using unsigned initially) due to a
misrebase.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85751
Previously, the memory leaks on heap. Since the MlirOperationState is not intended to be used again after mlirOperationCreate, the patch simplify frees the memory in mlirOperationCreate instead of creating any new API.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85629
Introduce an initial version of C API for MLIR core IR components: Value, Type,
Attribute, Operation, Region, Block, Location. These APIs allow for both
inspection and creation of the IR in the generic form and intended for wrapping
in high-level library- and language-specific constructs. At this point, there
is no stability guarantee provided for the API.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident, lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83310