Make promote single iteration optional on affine-loop-normalize:
introduce a command-line flag and an argument on the utility. Disable it
by default since such a promotion isn't normally expected with loop
normalization: it could drop certain structure or information on the
loops that a user wanted to preserve.
Reviewed By: dcaballe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137605
The patch introduces the required changes to update the pass declarations and definitions to use the new autogenerated files and allow dropping the old infrastructure.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, rriddle
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132838
The patch introduces the required changes to update the pass declarations and definitions to use the new autogenerated files and allow dropping the old infrastructure.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, rriddle
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132838
The only benefit of FunctionPass is that it filters out function
declarations. This isn't enough to justify carrying it around, as we can
simplify filter out declarations when necessary within the pass. We can
also explore with better scheduling primitives to filter out declarations
at the pipeline level in the future.
The definition of FunctionPass is left intact for now to allow time for downstream
users to migrate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117182
The normalizeAffineForOp and normalizedAffineParallel methods were
misplaced in the AffineLoopNormalize pass file while their declarations
were in affine utils. Move these to affine Utils.cpp. NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105468
This covers the extremely common case of replacing all uses of a Value
with a new op that is itself a user of the original Value.
This should also be a little bit more efficient than the
`SmallPtrSet<Operation *, 1>{op}` idiom that was being used before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102373
This enables to express more complex parallel loops in the affine framework,
for example, in cases of tiling by sizes not dividing loop trip counts perfectly
or inner wavefront parallelism, among others. One can't use affine.max/min
and supply values to the nested loop bounds since the results of such
affine.max/min operations aren't valid symbols. Making them valid symbols
isn't an option since they would introduce selection trees into memref
subscript arithmetic as an unintended and undesired consequence. Also
add support for converting such loops to SCF. Drop some API that isn't used in
the core repo from AffineParallelOp since its semantics becomes ambiguous in
presence of max/min bounds. Loop normalization is currently unavailable for
such loops.
Depends On D101171
Reviewed By: bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101172
Add support to normalize affine.for ops i.e., convert the lower bound to zero
and loop step to one. The Upper bound is set to the trip count of the loop.
The exact value of loopIV is calculated just inside the body of affine.for.
Currently loops with lower bounds having single result are supported. No such
restriction exists on upper bounds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92233
This patch renames AffineParallelNormalize to AffineLoopNormalize to make it
more generic and be able to hold more loop normalization transformations in
the future for affine.for and affine.parallel ops. Eventually, it could also be
extended to support scf.for and scf.parallel. As a starting point for affine.for,
the patch also adds support for removing single iteration affine.for ops to the
the pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90267
