Transform interfaces are implemented, direction or via extensions, in
libraries belonging to multiple other dialects. Those dialects don't
need to depend on the non-interface part of the transform dialect, which
includes the growing number of ops and transitive dependency footprint.
Split out the interfaces into a separate library. This in turn requires
flipping the dependency from the interface on the dialect that has crept
in because both co-existed in one library. The interface shouldn't
depend on the transform dialect either.
As a consequence of splitting, the capability of the interpreter to
automatically walk the payload IR to identify payload ops of a certain
kind based on the type used for the entry point symbol argument is
disabled. This is a good move by itself as it simplifies the interpreter
logic. This functionality can be trivially replaced by a
`transform.structured.match` operation.
This PR adds promised interface declarations for all interfaces declared
in `InitAllDialects.h`.
Promised interfaces allow a dialect to declare that it will have an
implementation of a particular interface, crashing the program if one
isn't provided when the interface is used.
The patch adds operations to `BlockAndValueMapping` and renames it to `IRMapping`. When operations are cloned, old operations are mapped to the cloned operations. This allows mapping from an operation to a cloned operation. Example:
```
Operation *opWithRegion = ...
Operation *opInsideRegion = &opWithRegion->front().front();
IRMapping map
Operation *newOpWithRegion = opWithRegion->clone(map);
Operation *newOpInsideRegion = map.lookupOrNull(opInsideRegion);
```
Migration instructions:
All includes to `mlir/IR/BlockAndValueMapping.h` should be replaced with `mlir/IR/IRMapping.h`. All uses of `BlockAndValueMapping` need to be renamed to `IRMapping`.
Reviewed By: rriddle, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139665
tensor.empty/linalg.init_tensor produces an uninititalized tensor that can be used as a destination operand for destination-style ops (ops that implement `DestinationStyleOpInterface`).
This change makes it possible to implement `TilingInterface` for non-destination-style ops without depending on the Linalg dialect.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-tensor-from-shape-operation/65101
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135129
Now that dialect constructors are generated in the .cpp file, we can
drop all of the dependent dialect includes from the .h file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124298
* Previously, we were only generating .h.inc files. We foresee the need to also generate implementations and this is a step towards that.
* Discussed in https://llvm.discourse.group/t/generating-cpp-inc-files-for-dialects/3732/2
* Deviates from the discussion above by generating a default constructor in the .cpp.inc file (and adding a tablegen bit that disables this in case if this is user provided).
* Generating the destructor started as a way to flush out the missing includes (produces a link error), but it is a strict improvement on its own that is worth doing (i.e. by emitting key methods in the .cpp file, we root vtables in one translation unit, which is a non-controversial improvement).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105070
(1) migrates the encoding from TensorDialect into the new SparseTensorDialect
(2) replaces dictionary-based storage and builders with struct-like data
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101669
The new "encoding" field in tensor types so far had no meaning. This revision introduces:
1. an encoding attribute interface in IR: for verification between tensors and encodings in general
2. an attribute in Tensor dialect; #tensor.sparse<dict> + concrete sparse tensors API
Active discussion:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-introduce-a-sparse-tensor-type-to-core-mlir/2944/
Reviewed By: silvas, penpornk, bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101008
This reverts commit 0d48d265db6633e4e575f81f9d3a52139b1dc5ca.
This reapplies the following commit, with a fix for CAPI/ir.c:
[mlir] Start splitting the `tensor` dialect out of `std`.
This starts by moving `std.extract_element` to `tensor.extract` (this
mirrors the naming of `vector.extract`).
Curiously, `std.extract_element` supposedly works on vectors as well,
and this patch removes that functionality. I would tend to do that in
separate patch, but I couldn't find any downstream users relying on
this, and the fact that we have `vector.extract` made it seem safe
enough to lump in here.
This also sets up the `tensor` dialect as a dependency of the `std`
dialect, as some ops that currently live in `std` depend on
`tensor.extract` via their canonicalization patterns.
Part of RFC: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-tensor-dialect-from-std/2347/2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92991
This reverts commit cab8dda90f48e15ee94b0d55ceac5b6a812e4743.
I mistakenly thought that CAPI/ir.c failure was unrelated to this
change. Need to debug it.
This starts by moving `std.extract_element` to `tensor.extract` (this
mirrors the naming of `vector.extract`).
Curiously, `std.extract_element` supposedly works on vectors as well,
and this patch removes that functionality. I would tend to do that in
separate patch, but I couldn't find any downstream users relying on
this, and the fact that we have `vector.extract` made it seem safe
enough to lump in here.
This also sets up the `tensor` dialect as a dependency of the `std`
dialect, as some ops that currently live in `std` depend on
`tensor.extract` via their canonicalization patterns.
Part of RFC: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-tensor-dialect-from-std/2347/2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92991
