For all the mlir tests (except for roundtrip_coding.mlir), change the
check test to use general form of encoding
`#sparse_tensor.encoding<{{{.*}}}>` instead of actual encoding such as
`#sparse_tensor.encoding<{ lvlTypes = [ "compressed", "singleton" ] }>`.
In the new syntax, we will parse **loose_compressed** as
**CompressedWithHigh** and **block2_4** as **TwoOutOfFour** level
format. Currently, we support unique and order as level properties.
This commit is part of the migration of towards the new STEA syntax/design. In particular, this commit includes the following changes:
* Renaming compiler-internal functions/methods:
* `SparseTensorEncodingAttr::{getDimLevelType => getLvlTypes}`
* `Merger::{getDimLevelType => getLvlType}` (for consistency)
* `sparse_tensor::{getDimLevelType => buildLevelType}` (to help reduce confusion vs actual getter methods)
* Renaming external facets to match:
* the STEA parser and printer
* the C and Python bindings
* PyTACO
However, the actual renaming of the `DimLevelType` itself (along with all the "dlt" names) will be handled in a separate commit.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150330
The old "pointer/index" names often cause confusion since these names clash with names of unrelated things in MLIR; so this change rectifies this by changing everything to use "position/coordinate" terminology instead.
In addition to the basic terminology, there have also been various conventions for making certain distinctions like: (1) the overall storage for coordinates in the sparse-tensor, vs the particular collection of coordinates of a given element; and (2) particular coordinates given as a `Value` or `TypedValue<MemRefType>`, vs particular coordinates given as `ValueRange` or similar. I have striven to maintain these distinctions
as follows:
* "p/c" are used for individual position/coordinate values, when there is no risk of confusion. (Just like we use "d/l" to abbreviate "dim/lvl".)
* "pos/crd" are used for individual position/coordinate values, when a longer name is helpful to avoid ambiguity or to form compound names (e.g., "parentPos"). (Just like we use "dim/lvl" when we need a longer form of "d/l".)
I have also used these forms for a handful of compound names where the old name had been using a three-letter form previously, even though a longer form would be more appropriate. I've avoided renaming these to use a longer form purely for expediency sake, since changing them would require a cascade of other renamings. They should be updated to follow the new naming scheme, but that can be done in future patches.
* "coords" is used for the complete collection of crd values associated with a single element. In the runtime library this includes both `std::vector` and raw pointer representations. In the compiler, this is used specifically for buffer variables with C++ type `Value`, `TypedValue<MemRefType>`, etc.
The bare form "coords" is discouraged, since it fails to make the dim/lvl distinction; so the compound names "dimCoords/lvlCoords" should be used instead. (Though there may exist a rare few cases where is is appropriate to be intentionally ambiguous about what coordinate-space the coords live in; in which case the bare "coords" is appropriate.)
There is seldom the need for the pos variant of this notion. In most circumstances we use the term "cursor", since the same buffer is reused for a 'moving' pos-collection.
* "dcvs/lcvs" is used in the compiler as the `ValueRange` analogue of "dimCoords/lvlCoords". (The "vs" stands for "`Value`s".) I haven't found the need for it, but "pvs" would be the obvious name for a pos-`ValueRange`.
The old "ind"-vs-"ivs" naming scheme does not seem to have been sustained in more recent code, which instead prefers other mnemonics (e.g., adding "Buf" to the end of the names for `TypeValue<MemRefType>`). I have cleaned up a lot of these to follow the "coords"-vs-"cvs" naming scheme, though haven't done an exhaustive cleanup.
* "positions/coordinates" are used for larger collections of pos/crd values; in particular, these are used when referring to the complete sparse-tensor storage components.
I also prefer to use these unabbreviated names in the documentation, unless there is some specific reason why using the abbreviated forms helps resolve ambiguity.
In addition to making this terminology change, this change also does some cleanup along the way:
* correcting the dim/lvl terminology in certain places.
* adding `const` when it requires no other code changes.
* miscellaneous cleanup that was entailed in order to make the proper distinctions. Most of these are in CodegenUtils.{h,cpp}
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144773
While dense tensors support random accesses, it is critical to visit them in a row-major order for better cache locality. However, we previously consider dense inputs and outputs together when computing constraints for building iteration graph, it could lead us to less efficient iteration graphs.
This patch adds a new `SortMask::kIncludeDenseInput` to treat dense inputs/outputs separately when building iteration graph, thus increasing the chance for use to construct a better iteration graph.
A more fine-grained approach is to treat each input separately.
Note, related to:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51651
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144932
The "sparsification" pass does not need the ability to use runtime values for
the dimension, so the only source for variability would have been user code.
Restricting the dimension to constants simplifies code generation.
Reviewed By: Peiming, wrengr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133458
This change omits default values from the sparse tensor type,
saving considerable text real estate for the common cases.
Reviewed By: Peiming
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132083
This change removes the partial bufferization passes from the sparse compilation pipeline and replaces them with One-Shot Bufferize. One-Shot Analysis (and TensorCopyInsertion) is used to resolve all out-of-place bufferizations, dense and sparse. Dense ops are then bufferized with BufferizableOpInterface. Sparse ops are still bufferized in the Sparsification pass.
Details:
* Dense allocations are automatically deallocated, unless they are yielded from a block. (In that case the alloc would leak.) All test cases are modified accordingly. E.g., some funcs now have an "out" tensor argument that is returned from the function. (That way, the allocation happens at the call site.)
* Sparse allocations are *not* automatically deallocated. They must be "released" manually. (No change, this will be addressed in a future change.)
* Sparse tensor copies are not supported yet. (Future change)
* Sparsification no longer has to consider inplacability. If necessary, allocations and/or copies are inserted during TensorCopyInsertion. All tensors are inplaceable by the time Sparsification is running. Instead of marking a tensor as "not inplaceable", it can be marked as "not writable", which will trigger an allocation and/or copy during TensorCopyInsertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129356
Enforce the assumption made on tensor buffers explicitly. When in-place,
reuse the buffer, but fill with all zeroes for the non-update case, since
the kernel assumes all elements are written to. When not in-place, zero
out the new buffer when materializing or when no-updates occur. Copy the
original tensor value when updates occur. This prepares migrating to the
new bufferization strategy, where these assumptions must be made explicit.
Reviewed By: springerm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128691
A very small refactoring, but a big impact on tests that expect an exact order.
This revision fixes the tests, but also makes them less brittle for similar
minor changes in the future!
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119992
The earlier reduction "scalarization" was only applied to a chain of
*innermost* and *for* loops. This revision generalizes this to any
nesting of for- and while-loops. This implies that reductions can be
implemented with a lot less load and store operations. The chaining
is implemented with a forest of yield statements (but not as bad as
when we would also include the while-induction).
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52311
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113078
Precursor: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110200
Removed redundant ops from the standard dialect that were moved to the
`arith` or `math` dialects.
Renamed all instances of operations in the codebase and in tests.
Reviewed By: rriddle, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110797
The sparse index order must always be satisfied, but this
may give a choice in topsorts for several cases. We broke
ties in favor of any dense index order, since this gives
good locality. However, breaking ties in favor of pushing
unrelated indices into sparse iteration spaces gives better
asymptotic complexity. This revision improves the heuristic.
Note that in the long run, we are really interested in using
ML for ML to find the best loop ordering as a replacement for
such heuristics.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109100
* Split memref.dim into two operations: memref.dim and tensor.dim. Both ops have the same builder interface and op argument names, so that they can be used with templates in patterns that apply to both tensors and memrefs (e.g., some patterns in Linalg).
* Add constant materializer to TensorDialect (needed for folding in affine.apply etc.).
* Remove some MemRefDialect dependencies, make some explicit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105165
A very elaborate, but also very fun revision because all
puzzle pieces are finally "falling in place".
1. replaces lingalg annotations + flags with proper sparse tensor types
2. add rigorous verification on sparse tensor type and sparse primitives
3. removes glue and clutter on opaque pointers in favor of sparse tensor types
4. migrates all tests to use sparse tensor types
NOTE: next CL will remove *all* obsoleted sparse code in Linalg
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102095
This revision migrates more code from Linalg into the new permanent home of
SparseTensor. It replaces the test passes with proper compiler passes.
NOTE: the actual removal of the last glue and clutter in Linalg will follow
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101811
