1. C++ enum is set through enum class LevelType : uint_64.
2. C enum is set through typedef uint_64 level_type. It is due to the
limitations in Windows build: setting enum width to ui64 is not
supported in C.
This commit changes the SparseTensor LLVM dialect lowering from using
`llvm.ptr<i8>` to `llvm.ptr`. This change ensures that the lowering now
properly relies on opaque pointers, instead of working with already type
erased i8 pointers.
This completely centralizes all set up related to dim2lvl and lvl2dim
for the runtime library (and even parts of direct IR codegen) into one
place! And all comptatible with the MapRef data structure that should be
used in all remaining clients of dim2lvl and lvl2dim.
NOTE: the convert_x2y.mlir tests were becoming too overloaded
so I decided to bring them back to the basics; if e.g.
more coverage of the foreach is required, they should
go into isolated smalle tests
This revision replaces the LLVM dialect NullOp by the recently
introduced ZeroOp. The ZeroOp is more generic in the sense that it
represents zero values of any LLVM type rather than null pointers only.
This is a follow to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65508
This commit is part of the migration of towards the new STEA syntax/design. In particular, this commit includes the following changes:
* Renaming compiler-internal functions/methods:
* `SparseTensorEncodingAttr::{getDimLevelType => getLvlTypes}`
* `Merger::{getDimLevelType => getLvlType}` (for consistency)
* `sparse_tensor::{getDimLevelType => buildLevelType}` (to help reduce confusion vs actual getter methods)
* Renaming external facets to match:
* the STEA parser and printer
* the C and Python bindings
* PyTACO
However, the actual renaming of the `DimLevelType` itself (along with all the "dlt" names) will be handled in a separate commit.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150330
The old "pointer/index" names often cause confusion since these names clash with names of unrelated things in MLIR; so this change rectifies this by changing everything to use "position/coordinate" terminology instead.
In addition to the basic terminology, there have also been various conventions for making certain distinctions like: (1) the overall storage for coordinates in the sparse-tensor, vs the particular collection of coordinates of a given element; and (2) particular coordinates given as a `Value` or `TypedValue<MemRefType>`, vs particular coordinates given as `ValueRange` or similar. I have striven to maintain these distinctions
as follows:
* "p/c" are used for individual position/coordinate values, when there is no risk of confusion. (Just like we use "d/l" to abbreviate "dim/lvl".)
* "pos/crd" are used for individual position/coordinate values, when a longer name is helpful to avoid ambiguity or to form compound names (e.g., "parentPos"). (Just like we use "dim/lvl" when we need a longer form of "d/l".)
I have also used these forms for a handful of compound names where the old name had been using a three-letter form previously, even though a longer form would be more appropriate. I've avoided renaming these to use a longer form purely for expediency sake, since changing them would require a cascade of other renamings. They should be updated to follow the new naming scheme, but that can be done in future patches.
* "coords" is used for the complete collection of crd values associated with a single element. In the runtime library this includes both `std::vector` and raw pointer representations. In the compiler, this is used specifically for buffer variables with C++ type `Value`, `TypedValue<MemRefType>`, etc.
The bare form "coords" is discouraged, since it fails to make the dim/lvl distinction; so the compound names "dimCoords/lvlCoords" should be used instead. (Though there may exist a rare few cases where is is appropriate to be intentionally ambiguous about what coordinate-space the coords live in; in which case the bare "coords" is appropriate.)
There is seldom the need for the pos variant of this notion. In most circumstances we use the term "cursor", since the same buffer is reused for a 'moving' pos-collection.
* "dcvs/lcvs" is used in the compiler as the `ValueRange` analogue of "dimCoords/lvlCoords". (The "vs" stands for "`Value`s".) I haven't found the need for it, but "pvs" would be the obvious name for a pos-`ValueRange`.
The old "ind"-vs-"ivs" naming scheme does not seem to have been sustained in more recent code, which instead prefers other mnemonics (e.g., adding "Buf" to the end of the names for `TypeValue<MemRefType>`). I have cleaned up a lot of these to follow the "coords"-vs-"cvs" naming scheme, though haven't done an exhaustive cleanup.
* "positions/coordinates" are used for larger collections of pos/crd values; in particular, these are used when referring to the complete sparse-tensor storage components.
I also prefer to use these unabbreviated names in the documentation, unless there is some specific reason why using the abbreviated forms helps resolve ambiguity.
In addition to making this terminology change, this change also does some cleanup along the way:
* correcting the dim/lvl terminology in certain places.
* adding `const` when it requires no other code changes.
* miscellaneous cleanup that was entailed in order to make the proper distinctions. Most of these are in CodegenUtils.{h,cpp}
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144773
Systematically updates the SparseTensorRuntime to properly distinguish tensor-dimensions from storage-levels (and their associated ranks, shapes, sizes, indices, etc). With a few exceptions which are noted in the code, this ensures the runtime has all the **semantic** changes necessary to support non-permutations.
(Whereas **operationally**, since we're still using `std::vector<uing64_t>` to represent the mappings, there's no way to pass in any interesting non-permutations. Changing the representation to `std::function` will be done in a separate differential.)
Depends On D137680
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137681
This differential adjusts the numeric values for DimLevelType values: using the low-order two bits for recording the "No" and "Nu" properties, and the high-order bits for the formats per se. (The choice of encoding may seem a bit peculiar, since the bits are mapped to negative properties rather than positive properties. But this was done in order to preserve the collation order of DimLevelType values. If we don't care about collation order, then we may prefer to flip the semantics of the property bits, so that they're less surprising to readers.)
Using distinguished bits for the properties and formats enables faster implementation for the predicates detecting those properties/formats, which matters because this is in the runtime library itself (rather than on the codegen side of things). This differential pushes through the changes to the enum values, and optimizes the basic predicates. However it does not optimize all the places where we check compound predicates (e.g., "is compressed or singleton"), to help reduce rebasing conflict with D134933. Those optimizations will be done after this differential and D134933 are landed.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135004
The indices for insert/compress were previously provided as
a memref<?xindex> with proper rank, since that matched the
argument for the runtime support libary better. However, with
proper codegen coming, providing the indices as SSA values
is much cleaner. This also brings the sparse_tensor.insert
closer to unification with tensor.insert, planned in the
longer run.
Reviewed By: Peiming
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134404
The operations to fill zero into newly allocated sparse tensor are redundant, plus it failed
to lowering the test cases provided in the patch as well.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132500
