This commit is part of the migration of towards the new STEA syntax/design. In particular, this commit includes the following changes:
* Renaming compiler-internal functions/methods:
* `SparseTensorEncodingAttr::{getDimLevelType => getLvlTypes}`
* `Merger::{getDimLevelType => getLvlType}` (for consistency)
* `sparse_tensor::{getDimLevelType => buildLevelType}` (to help reduce confusion vs actual getter methods)
* Renaming external facets to match:
* the STEA parser and printer
* the C and Python bindings
* PyTACO
However, the actual renaming of the `DimLevelType` itself (along with all the "dlt" names) will be handled in a separate commit.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150330
The old "pointer/index" names often cause confusion since these names clash with names of unrelated things in MLIR; so this change rectifies this by changing everything to use "position/coordinate" terminology instead.
In addition to the basic terminology, there have also been various conventions for making certain distinctions like: (1) the overall storage for coordinates in the sparse-tensor, vs the particular collection of coordinates of a given element; and (2) particular coordinates given as a `Value` or `TypedValue<MemRefType>`, vs particular coordinates given as `ValueRange` or similar. I have striven to maintain these distinctions
as follows:
* "p/c" are used for individual position/coordinate values, when there is no risk of confusion. (Just like we use "d/l" to abbreviate "dim/lvl".)
* "pos/crd" are used for individual position/coordinate values, when a longer name is helpful to avoid ambiguity or to form compound names (e.g., "parentPos"). (Just like we use "dim/lvl" when we need a longer form of "d/l".)
I have also used these forms for a handful of compound names where the old name had been using a three-letter form previously, even though a longer form would be more appropriate. I've avoided renaming these to use a longer form purely for expediency sake, since changing them would require a cascade of other renamings. They should be updated to follow the new naming scheme, but that can be done in future patches.
* "coords" is used for the complete collection of crd values associated with a single element. In the runtime library this includes both `std::vector` and raw pointer representations. In the compiler, this is used specifically for buffer variables with C++ type `Value`, `TypedValue<MemRefType>`, etc.
The bare form "coords" is discouraged, since it fails to make the dim/lvl distinction; so the compound names "dimCoords/lvlCoords" should be used instead. (Though there may exist a rare few cases where is is appropriate to be intentionally ambiguous about what coordinate-space the coords live in; in which case the bare "coords" is appropriate.)
There is seldom the need for the pos variant of this notion. In most circumstances we use the term "cursor", since the same buffer is reused for a 'moving' pos-collection.
* "dcvs/lcvs" is used in the compiler as the `ValueRange` analogue of "dimCoords/lvlCoords". (The "vs" stands for "`Value`s".) I haven't found the need for it, but "pvs" would be the obvious name for a pos-`ValueRange`.
The old "ind"-vs-"ivs" naming scheme does not seem to have been sustained in more recent code, which instead prefers other mnemonics (e.g., adding "Buf" to the end of the names for `TypeValue<MemRefType>`). I have cleaned up a lot of these to follow the "coords"-vs-"cvs" naming scheme, though haven't done an exhaustive cleanup.
* "positions/coordinates" are used for larger collections of pos/crd values; in particular, these are used when referring to the complete sparse-tensor storage components.
I also prefer to use these unabbreviated names in the documentation, unless there is some specific reason why using the abbreviated forms helps resolve ambiguity.
In addition to making this terminology change, this change also does some cleanup along the way:
* correcting the dim/lvl terminology in certain places.
* adding `const` when it requires no other code changes.
* miscellaneous cleanup that was entailed in order to make the proper distinctions. Most of these are in CodegenUtils.{h,cpp}
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144773
The "sparsification" pass does not need the ability to use runtime values for
the dimension, so the only source for variability would have been user code.
Restricting the dimension to constants simplifies code generation.
Reviewed By: Peiming, wrengr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133458
This change removes the partial bufferization passes from the sparse compilation pipeline and replaces them with One-Shot Bufferize. One-Shot Analysis (and TensorCopyInsertion) is used to resolve all out-of-place bufferizations, dense and sparse. Dense ops are then bufferized with BufferizableOpInterface. Sparse ops are still bufferized in the Sparsification pass.
Details:
* Dense allocations are automatically deallocated, unless they are yielded from a block. (In that case the alloc would leak.) All test cases are modified accordingly. E.g., some funcs now have an "out" tensor argument that is returned from the function. (That way, the allocation happens at the call site.)
* Sparse allocations are *not* automatically deallocated. They must be "released" manually. (No change, this will be addressed in a future change.)
* Sparse tensor copies are not supported yet. (Future change)
* Sparsification no longer has to consider inplacability. If necessary, allocations and/or copies are inserted during TensorCopyInsertion. All tensors are inplaceable by the time Sparsification is running. Instead of marking a tensor as "not inplaceable", it can be marked as "not writable", which will trigger an allocation and/or copy during TensorCopyInsertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129356
Precursor: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110200
Removed redundant ops from the standard dialect that were moved to the
`arith` or `math` dialects.
Renamed all instances of operations in the codebase and in tests.
Reviewed By: rriddle, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110797
Arbitrary shifts have some complications, but shift by invariants
(viz. tensor index exp only at left hand side) can be easily
handled with the conjunctive rule.
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106002
Adds zero-preserving unary operators from std. Also adds xor.
Performs minor refactoring to remove "zero" node, and pushed
the irregular logic for negi (not support in std) into one place.
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105928
Integral AND and OR follow the simple conjunction and disjuction rules
for lattice building. This revision also completes some of the Merge
refactoring by moving the remainder parts that are merger specific from
sparsification into utils files.
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105851
Right now, we only accept x/c with nonzero c, since this
conceptually can be treated as a x*(1/c) conjunction for both
FP and INT as far as lattice computations go. The codegen
keeps the division though to preserve precise semantics.
See discussion:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/sparse-tensors-in-mlir/3389/28
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105731
This revision extends the sparse compiler support from fp/int addition and multiplication to fp/int negation and subtraction, thereby increasing the scope of sparse kernels that can be compiled.
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105306
