This fixes some problems wrt dependence of captures in lambdas with
an explicit object parameter.
[temp.dep.expr] states that
> An id-expression is type-dependent if [...] its terminal name is
> - associated by name lookup with an entity captured by copy
> ([expr.prim.lambda.capture]) in a lambda-expression that has
> an explicit object parameter whose type is dependent [dcl.fct].
There were several issues with our implementation of this:
1. we were treating by-reference captures as dependent rather than
by-value captures;
2. tree transform wasn't checking whether referring to such a
by-value capture should make a DRE dependent;
3. when checking whether a DRE refers to such a by-value capture, we
were only looking at the immediately enclosing lambda, and not
at any parent lambdas;
4. we also forgot to check for implicit by-value captures;
5. lastly, we were attempting to determine whether a lambda has an
explicit object parameter by checking the `LambdaScopeInfo`'s
`ExplicitObjectParameter`, but it seems that that simply wasn't
set (yet) by the time we got to the check.
All of these should be fixed now.
This fixes#70604, #79754, #84163, #84425, #86054, #86398, and #86399.
This patch introduces a set of composable structures grouping the MLIR
operands associated to each OpenMP clause. This makes it easier to keep
the MLIR representation for the same clause consistent throughout all
operations that accept it.
The relevant clause operand structures are grouped into per-operation
structures using a mixin pattern and used to define new operation
constructors. These constructors can be used to avoid having to get the
order of a possibly large list of operands right.
Missing clauses are documented as TODOs, as well as operands which are
part of the relevant operation's operand structure but cannot be
attached to the associated operation yet, due to missing op arguments to
its MLIR definition.
A follow-up patch will update Flang lowering to make use of these
structures, simplifying the passing of information from clause
processing to operation-generating functions and also simplifying the
creation of operations through the use of the new operation
constructors.
This patch fixes a crash that happens when '`this`' is referenced
(implicitly or explicitly) in a dependent class scope function template
specialization that instantiates to a static member function. For
example:
```
template<typename T>
struct A
{
template<typename U>
static void f();
template<>
void f<int>()
{
this; // causes crash during instantiation
}
};
template struct A<int>;
```
This happens because during instantiation of the function body,
`Sema::getCurrentThisType` will return a null `QualType` which we
rebuild the `CXXThisExpr` with. A similar problem exists for implicit
class member access expressions in such contexts (which shouldn't really
happen within templates anyways per [class.mfct.non.static]
p2, but changing that is non-trivial). This patch fixes the crash by building
`UnresolvedLookupExpr`s instead of `MemberExpr`s for these implicit
member accesses, which will then be correctly rebuilt as `MemberExpr`s
during instantiation.
Allows us to match insert_subvector(insert_subvector(undef, insert_subvector(insert_subvector(undef, x, 0), y, 1), 0), 0),
insert_subvector(insert_subvector(undef, z, 0), w, 1), 2)
Some applications have alignment directives for members inside types.
This allows those to be present, but generally getting ignored [with a warning]
later on in the processing. This is just to allow the compilation to complete.
Create PatFrags for fadd, fmul, fsub, mul, smulh and umulh so that a
single set of patterns can be used. Patch then removes unused classes
and some redundant whitespace.
VPBlendRecipe does not use the first mask operand. Removing it allows
VPlan-based DCE to remove unused mask computations.
This also fixes#87410, where unused Not VPInstructions are considered
having only their first lane demanded, but some of their operands
providing a vector value due to other users.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/87410
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87770
The hasPendingBody member is redundant with the
PendingBodies.count(Decl*) method. This patch removes the redundant
hasPendingBody member and the corresponding InterestingDecl struct.
This follows on from #87616, but includes the tests with codegen
differences. These are presumably due to the fact that the splat is now
a constant expression. They don't seem to affect anything that we were
specifically testing for.
rldimi is 64-bit instruction, due to backward compatibility, it needs to
be expanded into series of rotate and masking in 32-bit environment. In
the future, we may improve bit permutation selector and remove such
direct codegen.
MIParser checks that implicit operands match the instruction definition,
so they have to be $vcc even in wave32 mode. Use the mirFileLoaded hook
to fix them after MIParser's checks, converting them to $vcc_lo which is
what that rest of CodeGen expects.
This is all just extending the fixImplicitOperands hack which was
introduced with GFX10, but at least it makes it possible to write a MIR
test which creates the same instructions that normal CodeGen would
generate.
If the subtarget has +zvbb then we can attempt folding shl and shl_vl to
vwsll nodes.
There are few test cases where we still don't pick up the vwsll:
- For fixed vector vwsll.vi on RV32, see the FIXME for VMV_V_X_VL in
fillUpExtensionSupport for support implicit sign extension
- For scalable vector vwsll.vi we need to support ISD::SPLAT_VECTOR, see
#87249
In NodeExtensionHelper we keep track of the VL and mask of the operand
being extended and check that they are the same as the root node's.
However for the nodes that we support, none of them have a passthru
operand with the exception of RISCV::VMV_V_X_VL, but we check that it's
passthru is undef anyway.
So it's safe to just discard the extend node's VL and mask and just use
the root's instead. (This is the same type of reasoning we use to treat
any vmset_vl as an all ones mask)
This allows us to match some more cases where we mix VP/non-VP/VL nodes,
but these don't seem to appear in practice. The main benefit from this
would be to simplify the code.
A handy shorthand for specifying the shufflevector(insertelement(poison,
foo, 0), poison, zeroinitializer) splat pattern was introduced in
#74620.
Some of the RISC-V tests were converted over to use this new form in
dbb65dd330cc1696d7ca3dedc7aa9fa12c55a075, this patch handles the rest
which didn't have any codegen diffs.
This not only converts some constant expressions to the new form, but
also instruction sequences that weren't previously constant expressions
to constant expressions as well. In some cases this affects codegen, but
these have been omitted here and will be handled in a separate PR.
Original commit message:
"
Commit https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/46f3ade introduced a notion
of printing the attributes on the left to improve the printing of attributes
attached to variable declarations. The intent was to produce more GCC compatible
code because clang tends to print the attributes on the right hand side which is
not accepted by gcc.
This approach has increased the complexity in tablegen and the attrubutes
themselves as now the are supposed to know where they could appear. That lead to
mishandling of the `override` keyword which is modelled as an attribute in
clang.
This patch takes an inspiration from the existing approach and tries to keep the
position of the attributes as they were written. To do so we use simpler
heuristic which checks if the source locations of the attribute precedes the
declaration. If so, it is considered to be printed before the declaration.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/87151
"
The reason for the bot breakage is that attributes coming from ApiNotes are not
marked implicit even though they do not have source locations. This caused an
assert to trigger. This patch forces attributes with no source location
information to be printed on the left. That change is consistent to the overall
intent of the change to increase the chances for attributes to compile across
toolchains and at the same time the produced code to be as close as possible to
the one written by the user.
Matcher `capturesVar` should check for `capturesVariables()` before
calling `getCaptureVar()` since it asserts this `LambdaCapture` does
capture a variable.
Fixes#76425
- Use 1-parameter verifyFormat() to verify formatted input in LLVM style.
- Pass string literal instead of constructed StringRef to verifyFormat().
- Don't include trailing newlines if not needed.
Commit https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/46f3ade introduced a
notion of printing the attributes on the left to improve the printing of
attributes attached to variable declarations. The intent was to produce
more GCC compatible code because clang tends to print the attributes on
the right hand side which is not accepted by gcc.
This approach has increased the complexity in tablegen and the
attrubutes themselves as now the are supposed to know where they could
appear. That lead to mishandling of the `override` keyword which is
modelled as an attribute in clang.
This patch takes an inspiration from the existing approach and tries to
keep the position of the attributes as they were written. To do so we
use simpler heuristic which checks if the source locations of the
attribute precedes the declaration. If so, it is considered to be
printed before the declaration.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/87151
This allows the subtract to reuse the storage of T. T will be assigned
over by the condition on the next iteration. I think assigning over a
moved from value should be ok.
…irectory (#88007)"
This reverts commit 8671429151d5e67d3f21a737809953ae8bdfbfde.
This commit broke the flang build, so I'm reverting it. See the comments
in merge request #88007 for more information.
Fix typo bug in AffineExprVisitor for the WalkResult return case. This
didn't show up immmediately because most walks in the tree didn't
use walk result.
I forgot to tidy up these lines that should've been done in the previous
commit, specifically:
1. Merge two `CodeSynthesisContext`s into one in `CheckTemplateIdType`.
2. Remove some gratuitous `Sema::` specifiers.
3. Rename the parameter `Template` to `Entity` to avoid confusion.
Some of the SB API method description docstrings for swing are annotated
as `%feature("autodoc")` - but `"autodoc"` annotations are only to
substitute a string showing the arguments and return variables - either
in a single line, or in multiple lines. SBMemoryRegionInfo used
`"autodoc"` correctly describing the parameters and return type, but
then it added a description too which is not correct either.
Change all of these that are adding a method description to use
`%feature("docstring")` instead. There were a half dozen instances where
`"autodoc"` was correctly being used and we have overriden the parameter
and return types with a more readable version.
Same idea as 006aaf32258 -- reduce boilerplate and improve readability. This
time updates will be piecemeal to make it easier to identify errors.
Coding my way home: 2.18555S, 93.78063W
