structured-block
where clause is one of the following:
private(list)
reduction([reduction-modifier ,] reduction-identifier : list)
nowait
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157933
I'm involved with the Static Analyzer for the most part.
I think we should embrace newer language standard features and gradually
move forward.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154325
This patch introduces a new `CXXLifetimeExtendedObjectRegion` as a representation
of the memory for the temporary object that is lifetime extended by the reference
to which they are bound.
This separation provides an ability to detect the use of dangling pointers
(either binding or dereference) in a robust manner.
For example, the `ref` is conditionally dangling in the following example:
```
template<typename T>
T const& select(bool cond, T const& t, T const& u) { return cond ? t : u; }
int const& le = Composite{}.x;
auto&& ref = select(cond, le, 10);
```
Before the change, regardless of the value of `cond`, the `select()` call would
have returned a `temp_object` region.
With the proposed change we would produce a (non-dangling) `lifetime_extended_object`
region with lifetime bound to `le` or a `temp_object` region for the dangling case.
We believe that such separation is desired, as such lifetime extended temporaries
are closer to the variables. For example, they may have a static storage duration
(this patch removes a static temporary region, which was an abomination).
We also think that alternative approaches are not viable.
While for some cases it may be possible to determine if the region is lifetime
extended by searching the parents of the initializer expr, this quickly becomes
complex in the presence of the conditions operators like this one:
```
Composite cc;
// Ternary produces prvalue 'int' which is extended, as branches differ in value category
auto&& x = cond ? Composite{}.x : cc.x;
// Ternary produces xvalue, and extends the Composite object
auto&& y = cond ? Composite{}.x : std::move(cc).x;
```
Finally, the lifetime of the `CXXLifetimeExtendedObjectRegion` is tied to the lifetime of
the corresponding variables, however, the "liveness" (or reachability) of the extending
variable does not imply the reachability of all symbols in the region.
In conclusion `CXXLifetimeExtendedObjectRegion`, in contrast to `VarRegions`, does not
need any special handling in `SymReaper`.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-detecting-uses-of-dangling-references/70731
Reviewed By: xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151325
This patch adds CFGElementRef to ProgramPoints
and helps the analyzer to differentiate between
two otherwise identically looking ProgramPoints.
Fixes#60412
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143328
This commit relands the patches for implementing P0960R3 and P1975R0,
which describe initializing aggregates via a parenthesized list.
The relanded commits are:
* 40c52159d3ee - P0960R3 and P1975R0: Allow initializing aggregates from
a parenthesized list of values
* c77a91bb7ba7 - Remove overly restrictive aggregate paren init logic
* 32d7aae04fdb - Fix a clang crash on invalid code in C++20 mode
This patch also fixes a crash in the original implementation.
Previously, if the input tried to call an implicitly deleted copy or
move constructor of a union, we would then try to initialize the union
by initializing it's first element with a reference to a union. This
behavior is incorrect (we should fail to initialize) and if the type of
the first element has a constructor with a single template typename
parameter, then Clang will explode. This patch fixes that issue by
checking that constructor overload resolution did not result in a
deleted function before attempting parenthesized aggregate
initialization.
Additionally, this patch also includes D140159, which contains some
minor fixes made in response to code review comments in the original
implementation that were made after that patch was submitted.
Co-authored-by: Sheng <ox59616e@gmail.com>
Fixes#54040, Fixes#59675
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141546
When the engine processes a store to a variable, it will eventually call
`ExprEngine::processPointerEscapedOnBind()`. This function is supposed to
invalidate (put the given locations to an escape list) the locations
which we cannot reason about.
Unfortunately, local static variables are also put into this list.
This patch relaxes the guard condition, so that beyond stack variables,
static local variables are also ignored.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139534
This feature causes clang to crash when compiling Chrome - see
https://crbug.com/1405031 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59675
Revert "[clang] Fix a clang crash on invalid code in C++20 mode."
This reverts commit 32d7aae04fdb58e65a952f281ff2f2c3f396d98f.
Revert "[clang] Remove overly restrictive aggregate paren init logic"
This reverts commit c77a91bb7ba793ec3a6a5da3743ed55056291658.
Revert "[clang][C++20] P0960R3 and P1975R0: Allow initializing aggregates from a parenthesized list of values"
This reverts commit 40c52159d3ee337dbed14e4c73b5616ea354c337.
This avoids the continuous API churn when upgrading things to use
std::optional and makes trivial string replace upgrades possible.
I tested this with GCC 7.5, the oldest supported GCC I had around.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140332
This patch implements P0960R3, which allows initialization of aggregates
via parentheses.
As an example:
```
struct S { int i, j; };
S s1(1, 1);
int arr1[2](1, 2);
```
This patch also implements P1975R0, which fixes the wording of P0960R3
for single-argument parenthesized lists so that statements like the
following are allowed:
```
S s2(1);
S s3 = static_cast<S>(1);
S s4 = (S)1;
int (&&arr2)[] = static_cast<int[]>(1);
int (&&arr3)[2] = static_cast<int[2]>(1);
```
This patch was originally authored by @0x59616e and completed by
@ayzhao.
Fixes#54040, Fixes#54041
Co-authored-by: Sheng <ox59616e@gmail.com>
Full write up : https://discourse.llvm.org/t/c-20-rfc-suggestion-desired-regarding-the-implementation-of-p0960r3/63744
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129531
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
We now skip the destruction of array elements for `delete[] p`,
if the value of `p` is UnknownVal and does not have corresponding region.
This eliminate the crash in `getDynamicElementCount` on that
region and matches the behavior for deleting the array of
non-constant range.
Reviewed By: isuckatcs
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136671
This was done as a test for D137302 and it makes sense to push these changes
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137491
The Clang Static Analyzer will crash on this code:
```lang=C++
struct Box {
int value;
};
template <Box V> int get() {
return V.value;
}
template int get<Box{-1}>();
```
https://godbolt.org/z/5Yb1sMMMb
The problem is that we don't account for encountering `TemplateParamObjectDecl`s
within the `DeclRefExpr` handler in the `ExprEngine`.
IMO we should create a new memregion for representing such template
param objects, to model their language semantics.
Such as:
- it should have global static storage
- for two identical values, their addresses should be identical as well
http://eel.is/c%2B%2Bdraft/temp.param#8
I was thinking of introducing a `TemplateParamObjectRegion` under `DeclRegion`
for this purpose. It could have `TemplateParamObjectDecl` as a field.
The `TemplateParamObjectDecl::getValue()` returns `APValue`, which might
represent multiple levels of structures, unions and other goodies -
making the transformation from `APValue` to `SVal` a bit complicated.
That being said, for now, I think having `Unknowns` for such cases is
definitely an improvement to crashing, hence I'm proposing this patch.
Reviewed By: xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135763
ProcessMemberDtor(), ProcessDeleteDtor(), and ProcessAutomaticObjDtor():
Fix static analyzer warnings with suspicious dereference of pointer
'Pred' in function call before NULL checks - NFCI
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135290
It turns out that in certain cases `SymbolRegions` are wrapped by
`ElementRegions`; in others, it's not. This discrepancy can cause the
analyzer not to recognize if the two regions are actually referring to
the same entity, which then can lead to unreachable paths discovered.
Consider this example:
```lang=C++
struct Node { int* ptr; };
void with_structs(Node* n1) {
Node c = *n1; // copy
Node* n2 = &c;
clang_analyzer_dump(*n1); // lazy...
clang_analyzer_dump(*n2); // lazy...
clang_analyzer_dump(n1->ptr); // rval(n1->ptr): reg_$2<int * SymRegion{reg_$0<struct Node * n1>}.ptr>
clang_analyzer_dump(n2->ptr); // rval(n2->ptr): reg_$1<int * Element{SymRegion{reg_$0<struct Node * n1>},0 S64b,struct Node}.ptr>
clang_analyzer_eval(n1->ptr != n2->ptr); // UNKNOWN, bad!
(void)(*n1);
(void)(*n2);
}
```
The copy of `n1` will insert a new binding to the store; but for doing
that it actually must create a `TypedValueRegion` which it could pass to
the `LazyCompoundVal`. Since the memregion in question is a
`SymbolicRegion` - which is untyped, it needs to first wrap it into an
`ElementRegion` basically implementing this untyped -> typed conversion
for the sake of passing it to the `LazyCompoundVal`.
So, this is why we have `Element{SymRegion{.}, 0,struct Node}` for `n1`.
The problem appears if the analyzer evaluates a read from the expression
`n1->ptr`. The same logic won't apply for `SymbolRegionValues`, since
they accept raw `SubRegions`, hence the `SymbolicRegion` won't be
wrapped into an `ElementRegion` in that case.
Later when we arrive at the equality comparison, we cannot prove that
they are equal.
For more details check the corresponding thread on discourse:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/are-symbolicregions-really-untyped/64406
---
In this patch, I'm eagerly wrapping each `SymbolicRegion` by an
`ElementRegion`; basically canonicalizing to this form.
It seems reasonable to do so since any object can be thought of as a single
array of that object; so this should not make much of a difference.
The tests also underpin this assumption, as only a few were broken by
this change; and actually fixed a FIXME along the way.
About the second example, which does the same copy operation - but on
the heap - it will be fixed by the next patch.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132142
This patch dumps every state trait in the egraph. Also
the empty state traits are no longer dumped, instead
they are treated as null by the egraph rewriter script,
which solves reverse compatibility issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131187
The constructors of non-POD array elements are evaluated under
certain conditions. This patch makes sure that in such cases
we also evaluate the destructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130737
This patch makes it possible for lambdas, implicit copy/move ctors
and structured bindings to handle non-POD multidimensional arrays.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131840
This patch adds a ProgramPointTag to the EpsilonPoint created
before we replay a call without inlining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132246
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.
This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.
In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.
We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.
In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.
Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.
at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.
This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.
In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.
We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.
In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.
Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.
at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
I went over the output of the following mess of a command:
(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z |
parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell list --mode=none --ignore-case |
grep -E '^[A-Za-z][a-z]*$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n |
grep -vE '.{25}' | aspell pipe -W3 | grep : | cut -d' ' -f2 | less)
and proceeded to spend a few days looking at it to find probable typos
and fixed a few hundred of them in all of the llvm project (note, the
ones I found are not anywhere near all of them, but it seems like a
good start).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130827
This patch introduces a new `ConstructionContext` for
lambda capture. This `ConstructionContext` allows the
analyzer to construct the captured object directly into
it's final region, and makes it possible to capture
non-POD arrays.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129967
This patch introduces the evaluation of ArrayInitLoopExpr
in case of structured bindings and implicit copy/move
constructor. The idea is to call the copy constructor for
every element in the array. The parameter of the copy
constructor is also manually selected, as it is not a part
of the CFG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129496
Introducing the support for evaluating the constructor
of every element in an array. The idea is to record the
index of the current array member being constructed and
create a loop during the analysis. We looping over the
same CXXConstructExpr as many times as many elements
the array has.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127973
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"parallel masked taskloop simd" construct introduced in
OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.10)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128946
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"parallel masked taskloop" construct introduced in
OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.9)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128834
The case when the bound variable is reference type in a
BindingDecl wasn't handled, which lead to false positives.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128716
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"masked taskloop simd" construct introduced in OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.8)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128693
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for "masked taskloop"
construct introduced in OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.7)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128478
Introducing structured binding to data members and more.
To handle binding to arrays, ArrayInitLoopExpr is also
evaluated, which enables the analyzer to store information
in two more cases. These are:
- when a lambda-expression captures an array by value
- in the implicit copy/move constructor for a class
with an array member
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126613
Thanks @kazu for helping me clean these parts in D127799.
I'm leaving the dump methods, along with the unused visitor handlers and
the forwarding methods.
The dead parts actually helped to uncover two bugs, to which I'm going
to post separate patches.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127836
I've faced crashes in the past multiple times when some
`check::EndAnalysis` callback caused some crash.
It's really anoying that it doesn't tell which function triggered this
callback.
This patch adds the well-known trace for that situation as well.
Example:
1. <eof> parser at end of file
2. While analyzing stack:
#0 Calling test11
Note that this does not have tests.
I've considered `unittests` for this purpose, by using the
`ASSERT_DEATH()` similarly how we check double eval called functions in
`ConflictingEvalCallsTest.cpp`, however, that the testsuite won't invoke
the custom handlers. Only the message of the `llvm_unreachable()` will
be printed. Consequently, it's not applicable for us testing this
feature.
I've also considered using an end-to-end LIT test for this.
For that, we would need to somehow overload the `clang_analyzer_crash()`
`ExprInspection` handler, to get triggered by other events than the
`EvalCall`. I'm not saying that we could not come up with a generic way
of causing crash in a specific checker callback, but I'm not sure if
that would worth the effort.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127389
