A class member named by an expression in a member function that may instantiate to a static _or_ non-static member is represented by a `UnresolvedLookupExpr` in order to defer the implicit transformation to a class member access expression until instantiation. Since `ASTContext::getDecltypeType` only creates a `DecltypeType` that has a `DependentDecltypeType` as its canonical type when the operand is instantiation dependent, and since we do not transform types unless they are instantiation dependent, we need to mark the `UnresolvedLookupExpr` as instantiation dependent in order to correctly build a `DecltypeType` using the expression as its operand with a `DependentDecltypeType` canonical type. Fixes#99873.
(cherry picked from commit 55ea36002bd364518c20b3ce282640c920697bf7)
After changes in PR #87144 and #93923 regressions appeared in some
cases. The problem was that if multiple anonymous enums are present in a
class and are imported as new the import of the second enum can fail
because it is detected as different from the first and causes ODR error.
Now in case of enums without name an existing similar enum is searched,
if not found the enum is imported. ODR error is not detected. This may
be incorrect if non-matching structures are imported, but this is the
less important case (import of matching classes is more important to
work).
Reported by Static Analyzer Tool:
In
clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitCountAttributedType(clang::CountAttributedType
const *): Using the auto keyword without an & causes the copy of an
object of type TypeCoupledDeclRefInfo
This reverts commit ce4aada6e2135e29839f672a6599db628b53295d and a
follow-up patch 8ef26f1289bf069ccc0d6383f2f4c0116a1206c1.
This new warning can not be fully suppressed by the
`-Wno-missing-dependent-template-keyword` flag, this gives developer no
time to do the cleanup in a large codebase, see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98547#issuecomment-2228250884
Reapplies #92957, fixing an instance where the `template` keyword was
missing prior to a dependent name in `llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h`. An
_alias-declaration_ is used to work around a bug affecting GCC releases
before 11.1 (see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94799) which
rejects the use of the `template` keyword prior to the
_nested-name-specifier_ in the class member access.
CWG1835 was one of the many core issues resolved by P1787R6: "Declarations and where to
find them" (http://wg21.link/p1787r6). Its resolution changes how
member-qualified names (as defined by [basic.lookup.qual.general] p2) are looked
up. This patch implementation that resolution.
Previously, an _identifier_ following `.` or `->` would be first looked
up in the type of the object expression (i.e. qualified lookup), and
then in the context of the _postfix-expression_ (i.e. unqualified
lookup) if nothing was found; the result of the second lookup was
required to name a class template. Notably, this second lookup would
occur even when the object expression was dependent, and its result
would be used to determine whether a `<` token is the start of a
_template-argument_list_.
The new wording in [basic.lookup.qual.general] p2 states:
> A member-qualified name is the (unique) component name, if any, of
> - an _unqualified-id_ or
> - a _nested-name-specifier_ of the form _`type-name ::`_ or
_`namespace-name ::`_
>
> in the id-expression of a class member access expression. A
***qualified name*** is
> - a member-qualified name or
> - the terminal name of
> - a _qualified-id_,
> - a _using-declarator_,
> - a _typename-specifier_,
> - a _qualified-namespace-specifier_, or
> - a _nested-name-specifier_, _elaborated-type-specifier_, or
_class-or-decltype_ that has a _nested-name-specifier_.
>
> The _lookup context_ of a member-qualified name is the type of its
associated object expression (considered dependent if the object
expression is type-dependent). The lookup context of any other qualified
name is the type, template, or namespace nominated by the preceding
_nested-name-specifier_.
And [basic.lookup.qual.general] p3 now states:
> _Qualified name lookup_ in a class, namespace, or enumeration performs
a search of the scope associated with it except as specified below.
Unless otherwise specified, a qualified name undergoes qualified name
lookup in its lookup context from the point where it appears unless the
lookup context either is dependent and is not the current instantiation
or is not a class or class template. If nothing is found by qualified
lookup for a member-qualified name that is the terminal name of a
_nested-name-specifier_ and is not dependent, it undergoes unqualified
lookup.
In non-standardese terms, these two paragraphs essentially state the
following:
- A name that immediately follows `.` or `->` in a class member access
expression is a member-qualified name
- A member-qualified name will be first looked up in the type of the
object expression `T` unless `T` is a dependent type that is _not_ the
current instantiation, e.g.
```
template<typename T>
struct A
{
void f(T* t)
{
this->x; // type of the object expression is 'A<T>'. although 'A<T>' is dependent, it is the
// current instantiation so we look up 'x' in the template definition context.
t->y; // type of the object expression is 'T' ('->' is transformed to '.' per [expr.ref]).
// 'T' is dependent and is *not* the current instantiation, so we lookup 'y' in the
// template instantiation context.
}
};
```
- If the first lookup finds nothing and:
- the member-qualified name is the first component of a
_nested-name-specifier_ (which could be an _identifier_ or a
_simple-template-id_), and either:
- the type of the object expression is the current instantiation and it
has no dependent base classes, or
- the type of the object expression is not dependent
then we lookup the name again, this time via unqualified lookup.
Although the second (unqualified) lookup is stated not to occur when the
member-qualified name is dependent, a dependent name will _not_ be
dependent once the template is instantiated, so the second lookup must
"occur" during instantiation if qualified lookup does not find anything.
This means that we must perform the second (unqualified) lookup during
parsing even when the type of the object expression is dependent, but
those results are _not_ used to determine whether a `<` token is the
start of a _template-argument_list_; they are stored so we can replicate
the second lookup during instantiation.
In even simpler terms (paraphrasing the meeting minutes from the review of P1787; see https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21summer2020/P1787%28Lookup%29Review2020-06-15Through2020-06-18):
- Unqualified lookup always happens for the first name in a
_nested-name-specifier_ that follows `.` or `->`
- The result of that lookup is only used to determine whether `<` is the
start of a _template-argument-list_ if the first (qualified) lookup
found nothing and the lookup context:
- is not dependent, or
- is the current instantiation and has no dependent base classes.
An example:
```
struct A
{
void f();
};
template<typename T>
using B = A;
template<typename T>
struct C : A
{
template<typename U>
void g();
void h(T* t)
{
this->g<int>(); // ok, '<' is the start of a template-argument-list ('g' was found via qualified lookup in the current instantiation)
this->B<void>::f(); // ok, '<' is the start of a template-argument-list (current instantiation has no dependent bases, 'B' was found via unqualified lookup)
t->g<int>(); // error: '<' means less than (unqualified lookup does not occur for a member-qualified name that isn't the first component of a nested-name-specifier)
t->B<void>::f(); // error: '<' means less than (unqualified lookup does not occur if the name is dependent)
t->template B<void>::f(); // ok: '<' is the start of a template-argument-list ('template' keyword used)
}
};
```
Some additional notes:
- Per [basic.lookup.qual.general] p1, lookup for a
member-qualified name only considers namespaces, types, and templates
whose specializations are types if it's an _identifier_ followed by
`::`; lookup for the component name of a _simple-template-id_ followed
by `::` is _not_ subject to this rule.
- The wording which specifies when the second unqualified lookup occurs
appears to be paradoxical. We are supposed to do it only for the first
component name of a _nested-name-specifier_ that follows `.` or `->`
when qualified lookup finds nothing. However, when that name is followed
by `<` (potentially starting a _simple-template-id_) we don't _know_
whether it will be the start of a _nested-name-specifier_ until we do
the lookup -- but we aren't supposed to do the lookup until we know it's
part of a _nested-name-specifier_! ***However***, since we only do the
second lookup when the first lookup finds nothing (and the name isn't
dependent), ***and*** since neither lookup is type-only, the only valid
option is for the name to be the _template-name_ in a
_simple-template-id_ that is followed by `::` (it can't be an
_unqualified-id_ naming a member because we already determined that the
lookup context doesn't have a member with that name). Thus, we can lock
into the _nested-name-specifier_ interpretation and do the second lookup
without having to know whether the _simple-template-id_ will be followed
by `::` yet.
In some situations a new `VarTemplateSpecializationDecl` (for the same
template) can be added during import of another one. The "insert
position" that is used to insert the current object into the list of
specializations is stored at start of the import and is used later. If
the list changes before the insertion the position is not valid any
more.
This patch adds a new builtin type for AMDGPU's buffer rsrc data type,
which is effectively an AS 8 pointer. This is needed because we'd like
to expose certain intrinsics to users via builtins which take buffer
rsrc as argument.
Don't skip searching in `ToContext` during importing `EnumDecl`. And
`IsStructuralMatch` in `StructralEquivalence` can make sure to determine
whether the found result is match or not.
---------
Co-authored-by: huqizhi <836744285@qq.com>
This is an enabler for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92855
This allows an NTTP default argument to be set as an arbitrary
TemplateArgument, not just an expression.
This allows template parameter packs to have default arguments in the
AST, even though the language proper doesn't support the syntax for it.
This allows NTTP default arguments to be other kinds of arguments, like
packs, integral constants, and such.
This is an enabler for a future patch.
This allows an type-parameter default argument to be set as an arbitrary
TemplateArgument, not just a type.
This allows template parameter packs to have default arguments in the
AST, even though the language proper doesn't support the syntax for it.
This will be used in a later patch which synthesizes template parameter
lists with arbitrary default arguments taken from template
specializations.
There are a few places we used SubsType, because we only had a type, now
we use SubstTemplateArgument.
SubstTemplateArgument was missing arguments for setting Instantiation
location and entity names.
Adding those is needed so we don't regress in diagnostics.
Our current method of storing the template arguments as written for
`(Class/Var)Template(Partial)SpecializationDecl` suffers from a number
of flaws:
- We use `TypeSourceInfo` to store `TemplateArgumentLocs` for class
template/variable template partial/explicit specializations. For
variable template specializations, this is a rather unintuitive hack (as
we store a non-type specialization as a type). Moreover, we don't ever
*need* the type as written -- in almost all cases, we only want the
template arguments (e.g. in tooling use-cases).
- The template arguments as written are stored in a number of redundant
data members. For example, `(Class/Var)TemplatePartialSpecialization`
have their own `ArgsAsWritten` member that stores an
`ASTTemplateArgumentListInfo` (the template arguments).
`VarTemplateSpecializationDecl` has yet _another_ redundant member
"`TemplateArgsInfo`" that also stores an `ASTTemplateArgumentListInfo`.
This patch eliminates all
`(Class/Var)Template(Partial)SpecializationDecl` members which store the
template arguments as written, and turns the `ExplicitInfo` member into
a `llvm::PointerUnion<const ASTTemplateArgumentListInfo*,
ExplicitInstantiationInfo*>` (to avoid unnecessary allocations when the
declaration isn't an explicit instantiation). The template arguments as
written are now accessed via `getTemplateArgsWritten` in all cases.
The "most breaking" change is to AST Matchers, insofar that `hasTypeLoc`
will no longer match class template specializations (since they no
longer store the type as written).
Reapplies #87541 and #88311 (again) addressing the bug which caused
expressions naming overload sets to be incorrectly rebuilt, as well as
the bug which caused base class members to always be treated as overload
sets.
The primary change since #88311 is `UnresolvedLookupExpr::Create` is called directly in `BuildPossibleImplicitMemberExpr` with `KnownDependent` as `true` (which causes the expression type to be set to `ASTContext::DependentTy`). This ensures that any further semantic analysis involving the type of the potentially implicit class member access expression is deferred until instantiation.
This patch adds a `Typename` bit-field to `TemplateTemplateParmDecl`
which stores whether the template template parameter was declared with
the `typename` keyword.
Fix crash in the testcase from
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/75114#issuecomment-1872595956
Forget to set inline of variable declaration would make
`isThisDeclarationADefinition` get incorrect result and didn't get
imported variable. This will lead to a new `VarTemplateDecl` being
created and call `setDescribedVarTemplate` again which produces the
crash.
Co-authored-by: huqizhi <836744285@qq.com>
HLSL constant sized array function parameters do not decay to pointers.
Instead constant sized array types are preserved as unique types for
overload resolution, template instantiation and name mangling.
This implements the change by adding a new `ArrayParameterType` which
represents a non-decaying `ConstantArrayType`. The new type behaves the
same as `ConstantArrayType` except that it does not decay to a pointer.
Values of `ConstantArrayType` in HLSL decay during overload resolution
via a new `HLSLArrayRValue` cast to `ArrayParameterType`.
`ArrayParamterType` values are passed indirectly by-value to functions
in IR generation resulting in callee generated memcpy instructions.
The behavior of HLSL function calls is documented in the [draft language
specification](https://microsoft.github.io/hlsl-specs/specs/hlsl.pdf)
under the Expr.Post.Call heading.
Additionally the design of this implementation approach is documented in
[Clang's
documentation](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/HLSL/FunctionCalls.html)
Resolves#70123
In `-fbounds-safety`, bounds annotations are considered type attributes
rather than declaration attributes. Constructing them as type attributes
allows us to extend the attribute to apply nested pointers, which is
essential to annotate functions that involve out parameters: `void
foo(int *__counted_by(*out_count) *out_buf, int *out_count)`.
We introduce a new sugar type to support bounds annotated types,
`CountAttributedType`. In order to maintain extra data (the bounds
expression and the dependent declaration information) that is not
trackable in `AttributedType` we create a new type dedicate to this
functionality.
This patch also extends the parsing logic to parse the `counted_by`
argument as an expression, which will allow us to extend the model to
support arguments beyond an identifier, e.g., `__counted_by(n + m)` in
the future as specified by `-fbounds-safety`.
This also adjusts `__bdos` and array-bounds sanitizer code that already
uses `CountedByAttr` to check `CountAttributedType` instead to get the
field referred to by the attribute.
Code of `VisitVarTemplateSpecializationDecl` was rewritten based on code
of `VisitVarDecl`. Additional changes (in structural equivalence) were
made to make tests pass.
Implements https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2662R3.pdf
The feature is exposed as an extension in older language modes.
Mangling is not yet supported and that is something we will have to do before release.
Previously committed as 9e08e51a20d0d2b1c5724bb17e969d036fced4cd, and
reverted because a dependency commit was reverted, then committed again
as 4b574008aef5a7235c1f894ab065fe300d26e786 and reverted again because
"dependency commit" 5a391d38ac6c561ba908334d427f26124ed9132e was
reverted. But it doesn't seem that 5a391d38ac6c was a real dependency
for this.
This commit incorporates 4b574008aef5a7235c1f894ab065fe300d26e786 and
18e093faf726d15f210ab4917142beec51848258 by Richard Smith (@zygoloid),
with some minor fixes, most notably:
- `UncommonValue` renamed to `StructuralValue`
- `VK_PRValue` instead of `VK_RValue` as default kind in lvalue and
member pointer handling branch in
`BuildExpressionFromNonTypeTemplateArgumentValue`;
- handling of `StructuralValue` in `IsTypeDeclaredInsideVisitor`;
- filling in `SugaredConverted` along with `CanonicalConverted`
parameter in `Sema::CheckTemplateArgument`;
- minor cleanup in
`TemplateInstantiator::transformNonTypeTemplateParmRef`;
- `TemplateArgument` constructors refactored;
- `ODRHash` calculation for `UncommonValue`;
- USR generation for `UncommonValue`;
- more correct MS compatibility mangling algorithm (tested on MSVC ver.
19.35; toolset ver. 143);
- IR emitting fixed on using a subobject as a template argument when the
corresponding template parameter is used in an lvalue context;
- `noundef` attribute and opaque pointers in `template-arguments` test;
- analysis for C++17 mode is turned off for templates in
`warn-bool-conversion` test; in C++17 and C++20 mode, array reference
used as a template argument of pointer type produces template argument
of UncommonValue type, and
`BuildExpressionFromNonTypeTemplateArgumentValue` makes
`OpaqueValueExpr` for it, and `DiagnoseAlwaysNonNullPointer` cannot see
through it; despite of "These cases should not warn" comment, I'm not
sure about correct behavior; I'd expect a suggestion to replace `if` by
`if constexpr`;
- `temp.arg.nontype/p1.cpp` and `dr18xx.cpp` tests fixed.
The 'counted_by' attribute is used on flexible array members. The
argument for the attribute is the name of the field member holding the
count of elements in the flexible array. This information is used to
improve the results of the array bound sanitizer and the
'__builtin_dynamic_object_size' builtin. The 'count' field member must
be within the same non-anonymous, enclosing struct as the flexible array
member. For example:
```
struct bar;
struct foo {
int count;
struct inner {
struct {
int count; /* The 'count' referenced by 'counted_by' */
};
struct {
/* ... */
struct bar *array[] __attribute__((counted_by(count)));
};
} baz;
};
```
This example specifies that the flexible array member 'array' has the
number of elements allocated for it in 'count':
```
struct bar;
struct foo {
size_t count;
/* ... */
struct bar *array[] __attribute__((counted_by(count)));
};
```
This establishes a relationship between 'array' and 'count';
specifically that 'p->array' must have *at least* 'p->count' number of
elements available. It's the user's responsibility to ensure that this
relationship is maintained throughout changes to the structure.
In the following, the allocated array erroneously has fewer elements
than what's specified by 'p->count'. This would result in an
out-of-bounds access not not being detected:
```
struct foo *p;
void foo_alloc(size_t count) {
p = malloc(MAX(sizeof(struct foo),
offsetof(struct foo, array[0]) + count *
sizeof(struct bar *)));
p->count = count + 42;
}
```
The next example updates 'p->count', breaking the relationship
requirement that 'p->array' must have at least 'p->count' number of
elements available:
```
void use_foo(int index, int val) {
p->count += 42;
p->array[index] = val; /* The sanitizer can't properly check this access */
}
```
In this example, an update to 'p->count' maintains the relationship
requirement:
```
void use_foo(int index, int val) {
if (p->count == 0)
return;
--p->count;
p->array[index] = val;
}
```
In some cases variable templates (specially if static member of record)
were not correctly imported and an assertion "Missing call to
MapImported?" could happen.
A friend template that is in a dependent context is not linked into
declaration chains (for example with the definition of the befriended
template). This condition was not correctly handled by `ASTImporter`.
The 'counted_by' attribute is used on flexible array members. The
argument for the attribute is the name of the field member holding the
count of elements in the flexible array. This information is used to
improve the results of the array bound sanitizer and the
'__builtin_dynamic_object_size' builtin. The 'count' field member must
be within the same non-anonymous, enclosing struct as the flexible array
member. For example:
```
struct bar;
struct foo {
int count;
struct inner {
struct {
int count; /* The 'count' referenced by 'counted_by' */
};
struct {
/* ... */
struct bar *array[] __attribute__((counted_by(count)));
};
} baz;
};
```
This example specifies that the flexible array member 'array' has the
number of elements allocated for it in 'count':
```
struct bar;
struct foo {
size_t count;
/* ... */
struct bar *array[] __attribute__((counted_by(count)));
};
```
This establishes a relationship between 'array' and 'count';
specifically that 'p->array' must have *at least* 'p->count' number of
elements available. It's the user's responsibility to ensure that this
relationship is maintained throughout changes to the structure.
In the following, the allocated array erroneously has fewer elements
than what's specified by 'p->count'. This would result in an
out-of-bounds access not not being detected:
```
struct foo *p;
void foo_alloc(size_t count) {
p = malloc(MAX(sizeof(struct foo),
offsetof(struct foo, array[0]) + count *
sizeof(struct bar *)));
p->count = count + 42;
}
```
The next example updates 'p->count', breaking the relationship
requirement that 'p->array' must have at least 'p->count' number of
elements available:
```
void use_foo(int index, int val) {
p->count += 42;
p->array[index] = val; /* The sanitizer can't properly check this access */
}
```
In this example, an update to 'p->count' maintains the relationship
requirement:
```
void use_foo(int index, int val) {
if (p->count == 0)
return;
--p->count;
p->array[index] = val;
}
```
This reverts commit fefdef808c230c79dca2eb504490ad0f17a765a5.
Breaks check-clang, see
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76348#issuecomment-1886029515
Also revert follow-on "[Clang] Update 'counted_by' documentation"
This reverts commit 4a3fb9ce27dda17e97341f28005a28836c909cfc.
The 'counted_by' attribute is used on flexible array members. The
argument for the attribute is the name of the field member holding the
count of elements in the flexible array. This information is used to
improve the results of the array bound sanitizer and the
'__builtin_dynamic_object_size' builtin. The 'count' field member must
be within the same non-anonymous, enclosing struct as the flexible array
member. For example:
```
struct bar;
struct foo {
int count;
struct inner {
struct {
int count; /* The 'count' referenced by 'counted_by' */
};
struct {
/* ... */
struct bar *array[] __attribute__((counted_by(count)));
};
} baz;
};
```
This example specifies that the flexible array member 'array' has the
number of elements allocated for it in 'count':
```
struct bar;
struct foo {
size_t count;
/* ... */
struct bar *array[] __attribute__((counted_by(count)));
};
```
This establishes a relationship between 'array' and 'count';
specifically that 'p->array' must have *at least* 'p->count' number of
elements available. It's the user's responsibility to ensure that this
relationship is maintained throughout changes to the structure.
In the following, the allocated array erroneously has fewer elements
than what's specified by 'p->count'. This would result in an
out-of-bounds access not not being detected:
```
struct foo *p;
void foo_alloc(size_t count) {
p = malloc(MAX(sizeof(struct foo),
offsetof(struct foo, array[0]) + count *
sizeof(struct bar *)));
p->count = count + 42;
}
```
The next example updates 'p->count', breaking the relationship
requirement that 'p->array' must have at least 'p->count' number of
elements available:
```
void use_foo(int index, int val) {
p->count += 42;
p->array[index] = val; /* The sanitizer can't properly check this access */
}
```
In this example, an update to 'p->count' maintains the relationship
requirement:
```
void use_foo(int index, int val) {
if (p->count == 0)
return;
--p->count;
p->array[index] = val;
}
```
Prior to `e9536698720ec524cc8b72599363622bc1a31558`
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D154764) we only re-ordered the fields of
`RecordDecl`s. The change refactored this logic to make sure
`FieldDecl`s are imported before other member decls. However, this
change also widened the types of `DeclContext`s we consider for
re-ordering from `RecordDecl` to anything that's a `DeclContext`. This
seems to have been just a drive-by cleanup.
Internally we've seen numerous crashes in LLDB where we try to perform
this re-ordering on fields of `ObjCInterfaceDecl`s.
This patch restores old behaviour where we limit the re-ordering to just
`RecordDecl`s.
rdar://119343184
rdar://119636274
rdar://119832131
import of `ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl` didn't set
`InstantiatedFromMember` and this makes ast-dump crash. import and set
`InstantiatedFromMember`. fix
[issue](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/76469)
Co-authored-by: huqizhi <836744285@qq.com>
Since import `ExplicitCastExpr` lacks of processing
`BuiltinBitCastExprClass` type, it would reach to the 'unreachable' code
and produce the crash. This patch aims to fix the
[crash](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/74774) and try to
handle `BuiltinBitCastExpr`.
Co-authored-by: huqizhi <836744285@qq.com>
Expression of attribute `align_value` was not imported. Import of the
attribute is corrected, a test for it is added, other related tests with
FIXME are updated.
Fixes#75054.
Lack of processing of `SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr` in
`isAncestorDeclContextOf` would make `hasAutoReturnTypeDeclaredInside`
returns false and lead to infinite recursion. This patch adds the
processor and try to fix [this
issue](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/74839)
Co-authored-by: huqizhi <836744285@qq.com>
There are many issues that popped up with the counted_by feature. The
patch #73730 has grown too large and approval is blocking Linux testing.
Includes reverts of:
commit 769bc11f684d ("[Clang] Implement the 'counted_by' attribute
(#68750)")
commit bc09ec696209 ("[CodeGen] Revamp counted_by calculations
(#70606)")
commit 1a09cfb2f35d ("[Clang] counted_by attr can apply only to C99
flexible array members (#72347)")
commit a76adfb992c6 ("[NFC][Clang] Refactor code to calculate flexible
array member size (#72790)")
commit d8447c78ab16 ("[Clang] Correct handling of negative and
out-of-bounds indices (#71877)")
Partial commit b31cd07de5b7 ("[Clang] Regenerate test checks (NFC)")
Closes#73168Closes#75173
Import of a function with `auto` return type that is expanded to a
`SubstTemplateTypeParmType` could fail if the function itself is the
template specialization where the parameter was replaced.
The dependence of a template argument is not only determined by the
argument itself, but also by the type of the template parameter:
> Furthermore, a non-type
[template-argument](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.names#nt:template-argument)
is dependent if the corresponding non-type
[template-parameter](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.param#nt:template-parameter)
is of reference or pointer type and the
[template-argument](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.names#nt:template-argument)
designates or points to a member of the current instantiation or a
member of a dependent
type[.](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.dep#temp-3.sentence-1)
For example:
```cpp
struct A{};
template <const A& T>
const A JoinStringViews = T;
template <int V>
class Builder {
public:
static constexpr A Equal{};
static constexpr auto Val = JoinStringViews<Equal>;
};
```
The constant expression `Equal` is not dependent, but because the type
of the template parameter is a reference type and `Equal` is a member of
the current instantiation, the template argument of
`JoinStringViews<Equal>` is actually dependent, which makes
`JoinStringViews<Equal>` dependent.
When a template-id of a variable template is dependent,
`CheckVarTemplateId` will return an `UnresolvedLookupExpr`, but
`UnresolvedLookupExpr` calculates dependence by template arguments only
(the `ConstantExpr` `Equal` here), which is not dependent. This causes
type deduction to think that `JoinStringViews<Equal>` is `OverloadTy`
and treat it as a function template, which is clearly wrong.
This PR adds a `KnownDependent` parameter to the constructor of
`UnresolvedLookupExpr`. After canonicalization, if `CanonicalConverted`
contains any dependent argument, `KnownDependent` is set to `true`. This
fixes the dependence calculation of `UnresolvedLookupExpr` for dependent
variable templates.
Fixes#65153 .
A problem with AST import could lead to multiple instances of the same
template class specialization, with different template arguments. The
difference was caused by pointers to different declarations of the same
function.
Problem is fixed by using the canonical declaration at import.
Co-authored-by: Balázs Kéri <balazs.keri@ericsson.com>
The 'counted_by' attribute is used on flexible array members. The
argument for the attribute is the name of the field member in the same
structure holding the count of elements in the flexible array. This
information can be used to improve the results of the array bound
sanitizer and the '__builtin_dynamic_object_size' builtin.
This example specifies the that the flexible array member 'array' has
the number of elements allocated for it in 'count':
struct bar;
struct foo {
size_t count;
/* ... */
struct bar *array[] __attribute__((counted_by(count)));
};
This establishes a relationship between 'array' and 'count',
specifically that 'p->array' must have *at least* 'p->count' number of
elements available. It's the user's responsibility to ensure that this
relationship is maintained through changes to the structure.
In the following, the allocated array erroneously has fewer elements
than what's specified by 'p->count'. This would result in an
out-of-bounds access not not being detected:
struct foo *p;
void foo_alloc(size_t count) {
p = malloc(MAX(sizeof(struct foo),
offsetof(struct foo, array[0]) + count *
sizeof(struct bar *)));
p->count = count + 42;
}
The next example updates 'p->count', breaking the relationship
requirement that 'p->array' must have at least 'p->count' number of
elements available:
struct foo *p;
void foo_alloc(size_t count) {
p = malloc(MAX(sizeof(struct foo),
offsetof(struct foo, array[0]) + count *
sizeof(struct bar *)));
p->count = count + 42;
}
void use_foo(int index) {
p->count += 42;
p->array[index] = 0; /* The sanitizer cannot properly check this access */
}
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148381
This reverts commit 9a954c693573281407f6ee3f4eb1b16cc545033d, which
causes clang crashes when compiling with `-fsanitize=bounds`. See
9a954c6935 (commitcomment-129529574)
for details.
This removes the `ClassScopeFunctionSpecializationDecl` `Decl` node, and
instead uses `DependentFunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo` to handle
such declarations. `DependentFunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo` is also
changed to store a `const ASTTemplateArgumentListInfo*` to be more in
line with `FunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo`.
This also changes `FunctionDecl::isFunctionTemplateSpecialization` to
return `true` for dependent specializations, and
`FunctionDecl::getTemplateSpecializationKind`/`FunctionDecl::getTemplateSpecializationKindForInstantiation`
to return `TSK_ExplicitSpecialization` for non-friend dependent
specializations (the same behavior as dependent class scope
`ClassTemplateSepcializationDecl` & `VarTemplateSepcializationDecl`).
