Resolves: #70930 (and probably latest comments from clangd/clangd#251)
by fixing racing for the shared DiagStorage value which caused messing with args inside the storage and then formatting the following message with getArgSInt(1) == 2:
def err_module_odr_violation_function : Error<
"%q0 has different definitions in different modules; "
"%select{definition in module '%2'|defined here}1 "
"first difference is "
which causes HandleSelectModifier to go beyond the ArgumentLen so the recursive call to FormatDiagnostic was made with DiagStr > DiagEnd that leads to infinite while (DiagStr != DiagEnd).
The Main Idea:
Reuse the existing DiagStorageAllocator logic to make all DiagnosticBuilders having independent states.
Also, encapsulating the rest of state (e.g. ID and Loc) into DiagnosticBuilder.
The last attempt failed -
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108187#issuecomment-2353122096
so was reverted - #108838
Resolves: #70930 (and probably latest comments from
https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/251)
by fixing racing for the shared `DiagStorage` value which caused messing
with args inside the storage and then formatting the following message
with `getArgSInt(1)` == 2:
```
def err_module_odr_violation_function : Error<
"%q0 has different definitions in different modules; "
"%select{definition in module '%2'|defined here}1 "
"first difference is "
```
which causes `HandleSelectModifier` to go beyond the `ArgumentLen` so
the recursive call to `FormatDiagnostic` was made with `DiagStr` >
`DiagEnd` that leads to infinite `while (DiagStr != DiagEnd)`.
**The Main Idea:**
Reuse the existing `DiagStorageAllocator` logic to make all
`DiagnosticBuilder`s having independent states.
Also, encapsulating the rest of state (e.g. ID and Loc) into
`DiagnosticBuilder`.
**TODO (if it will be requested by reviewer):**
- [x] add a test (I have no idea how to turn a whole bunch of my
proprietary code which leads `clangd` to OOM into a small public
example.. probably I must try using
[this](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/70930#issuecomment-2209872975)
instead)
- [x] [`Diag.CurDiagID !=
diag::fatal_too_many_errors`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108187#pullrequestreview-2296395489)
- [ ] ? get rid of `DiagStorageAllocator` at all and make
`DiagnosticBuilder` having they own `DiagnosticStorage` coz it seems
pretty small so should fit the stack for short-living
`DiagnosticBuilder` instances
This reverts commit e7f782e7481cea23ef452a75607d3d61f5bd0d22.
This had UBSan failures:
[----------] 1 test from ConfigCompileTests
[ RUN ] ConfigCompileTests.DiagnosticSuppression
Config fragment: compiling <unknown>:0 -> 0x00007B8366E2F7D8 (trusted=false)
/usr/local/google/home/fmayer/large/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:203:33: runtime error: reference binding to null pointer of type 'clang::DiagnosticIDs'
UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /usr/local/google/home/fmayer/large/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:203:33
Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108645
HLSL output parameters are denoted with the `inout` and `out` keywords
in the function declaration. When an argument to an output parameter is
constructed a temporary value is constructed for the argument.
For `inout` pamameters the argument is initialized via copy-initialization
from the argument lvalue expression to the parameter type. For `out`
parameters the argument is not initialized before the call.
In both cases on return of the function the temporary value is written
back to the argument lvalue expression through an implicit assignment
binary operator with casting as required.
This change introduces a new HLSLOutArgExpr ast node which represents
the output argument behavior. The OutArgExpr has three defined children:
- An OpaqueValueExpr of the argument lvalue expression.
- An OpaqueValueExpr of the copy-initialized parameter.
- A BinaryOpExpr assigning the first with the value of the second.
Fixes#87526
---------
Co-authored-by: Damyan Pepper <damyanp@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: John McCall <rjmccall@gmail.com>
Introducing `HLSLAttributedResourceType` - a new type that is similar to
`AttributedType` but with additional data specific to HLSL resources.
`AttributeType` currently only stores an attribute kind and no
additional data from the type attribute parameters. This does not really
work for HLSL resources since its type attributes contain non-boolean
values that need to be retained as well.
For example:
```
template <typename T> class RWBuffer {
__hlsl_resource_t [[hlsl::resource_class(uav)]] [[hlsl::is_rov]] handle;
};
```
The data `HLSLAttributedResourceType` needs to eventually store are:
- resource class (SRV, UAV, CBuffer, Sampler)
- texture dimension(1-3)
- flags is_rov, is_array, is_feedback and is_multisample
- contained type
All of these values except contained type will be stored in
`HLSLAttributedResourceType::Attributes` struct and accessed
individually via the fields. There is also `Data` alias that covers all
of these values as a `unsigned` which is used for hashing and the AST
type serialization.
During type attribute processing all HLSL type attributes will be
validated and collected by SemaHLSL (by
`SemaHLSL::handleResourceTypeAttr`) and in the end combined into a
single `HLSLAttributedResourceType` instance (in
`SemaHLSL::ProcessResourceTypeAttributes`). `SemaHLSL` will also need to
short-term store the `TypeLoc` information for the new type that will be
grabbed by `TypeSpecLocFiller` soon after the type is created.
Part 1/2 of #104861
Solve https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/2094
Due clangd will enable PCH automatically, the previous mechanism to skip
ODR check in GMF may be invalid. This patch fixes this for a case.
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/102721
Generally, the type of merged decls will be reused in ASTContext. But
for lambda, in the import and then include case, we can't decide its
previous decl in the imported modules so that we can't assign the
previous decl before creating the type for it. Since we can't decide its
numbering before creating it. So we have to assign the previous decl and
the canonical type for it after creating it, which is unusual and
slightly hack.
It is a long standing issue that the duplicated declarations in multiple
module units would cause the compilation performance to get slowed down.
And there are many questions or issue reports. So I think it is better
to add a warning for it.
And given this is not because the users' code violates the language
specification or any best practices, the warning is disabled by default
even if `-Wall` is specified. The users need to specify the warning
explcitly or use `Weverything`.
The documentation will add separately.
When we merge the definition for CXXRecordDecl, we would use
setCompleteDefinition(false) to mark the merged definition. But this was
not the correct/good interface. We can't know that the merged definition
was a definition then. And actually, we provided an interface for this:
demoteThisDefinitionToDeclaration.
So this patch tries to use the correct API.
This was found in the downstream developing. This is not strictly NFC
but it is intended to be NFC for every end users.
Relax the case for duplicated declaration in multiple module units for
explicit specialization and refactor the implementation of
checkMultipleDefinitionInNamedModules a little bit.
This is intended to not affect any end users since it only relaxes the
condition to emit an error.
Introduce "-fsanitize-undefined-ignore-overflow-pattern=" which can
be used to disable sanitizer instrumentation for common overflow-dependent
code patterns.
For a wide selection of projects, proper overflow sanitization could
help catch bugs and solve security vulnerabilities. Unfortunately, in
some cases the integer overflow sanitizers are too noisy for their users
and are often left disabled. Providing users with a method to disable
sanitizer instrumentation of common patterns could mean more projects
actually utilize the sanitizers in the first place.
One such project that has opted to not use integer overflow (or
truncation) sanitizers is the Linux Kernel. There has been some
discussion[1] recently concerning mitigation strategies for unexpected
arithmetic overflow. This discussion is still ongoing and a succinct
article[2] accurately sums up the discussion. In summary, many Kernel
developers do not want to introduce more arithmetic wrappers when
most developers understand the code patterns as they are.
Patterns like:
if (base + offset < base) { ... }
or
while (i--) { ... }
or
#define SOME -1UL
are extremely common in a code base like the Linux Kernel. It is
perhaps too much to ask of kernel developers to use arithmetic wrappers
in these cases. For example:
while (wrapping_post_dec(i)) { ... }
which wraps some builtin would not fly. This would incur too many
changes to existing code; the code churn would be too much, at least too
much to justify turning on overflow sanitizers.
Currently, this commit tackles three pervasive idioms:
1. "if (a + b < a)" or some logically-equivalent re-ordering like "if (a > b + a)"
2. "while (i--)" (for unsigned) a post-decrement always overflows here
3. "-1UL, -2UL, etc" negation of unsigned constants will always overflow
The patterns that are excluded can be chosen from the following list:
- add-overflow-test
- post-decr-while
- negated-unsigned-const
These can be enabled with a comma-separated list:
-fsanitize-undefined-ignore-overflow-pattern=add-overflow-test,negated-unsigned-const
"all" or "none" may also be used to specify that all patterns should be
excluded or that none should be.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202404291502.612E0A10@keescook/
[2] https://lwn.net/Articles/979747/
CCs: @efriedma-quic @kees @jyknight @fmayer @vitalybuka
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Introduce "-fsanitize-overflow-pattern-exclusion=" which can be used to
disable sanitizer instrumentation for common overflow-dependent code
patterns.
For a wide selection of projects, proper overflow sanitization could
help catch bugs and solve security vulnerabilities. Unfortunately, in
some cases the integer overflow sanitizers are too noisy for their users
and are often left disabled. Providing users with a method to disable
sanitizer instrumentation of common patterns could mean more projects
actually utilize the sanitizers in the first place.
One such project that has opted to not use integer overflow (or
truncation) sanitizers is the Linux Kernel. There has been some
discussion[1] recently concerning mitigation strategies for unexpected
arithmetic overflow. This discussion is still ongoing and a succinct
article[2] accurately sums up the discussion. In summary, many Kernel
developers do not want to introduce more arithmetic wrappers when
most developers understand the code patterns as they are.
Patterns like:
if (base + offset < base) { ... }
or
while (i--) { ... }
or
#define SOME -1UL
are extremely common in a code base like the Linux Kernel. It is
perhaps too much to ask of kernel developers to use arithmetic wrappers
in these cases. For example:
while (wrapping_post_dec(i)) { ... }
which wraps some builtin would not fly. This would incur too many
changes to existing code; the code churn would be too much, at least too
much to justify turning on overflow sanitizers.
Currently, this commit tackles three pervasive idioms:
1. "if (a + b < a)" or some logically-equivalent re-ordering like "if (a > b + a)"
2. "while (i--)" (for unsigned) a post-decrement always overflows here
3. "-1UL, -2UL, etc" negation of unsigned constants will always overflow
The patterns that are excluded can be chosen from the following list:
- add-overflow-test
- post-decr-while
- negated-unsigned-const
These can be enabled with a comma-separated list:
-fsanitize-overflow-pattern-exclusion=add-overflow-test,negated-unsigned-const
"all" or "none" may also be used to specify that all patterns should be
excluded or that none should be.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202404291502.612E0A10@keescook/
[2] https://lwn.net/Articles/979747/
CCs: @efriedma-quic @kees @jyknight @fmayer @vitalybuka
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
When instantiating a delayed template, the recorded token stream is
passed to `Parser::ParseLateTemplatedFuncDef` which will append the
current token "so it doesn't get lost". With incremental extensions
enabled, this is `repl_input_end` which subsequently needs support for
(de)serialization.
Currently we're merging the decls in ASTReaderDecl. But it is not so
convinient if we want to merge things in ASTReader.
This patch extract the funcitonality of merging decls from ASTReaderDecl
to a new class, ASTReaderMerger. Then it will be easier to merge decls
in ASTReader.
This may help the readability slightly too.
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/102684
The root cause of the issue is, it is possible that the predefined decl
is not registered at the beginning of writing a module file but got
created during the process of writing from reading.
This is incorrect. The predefined decls should always be predefined
decls.
Another deep thought about the issue is, we shouldn't read any new
things after we start to write the module file. But this is another
deeper question.
The preivous implementation of wasDeclEmitted may be confusing that
why we need to filter the declaration not from modules. Now adjust the
implementations to avoid the problems.
The use of _ requires either:
- (void)_ and curly braces, or
- [[maybe_unused]].
For simple repetitions like these, we can use traditional for loops
for readable warning-free code.
Claiming a mismatch is always in a precompiled header is wrong and
misleading as a mismatch can happen in any provided AST file. Emitting a
path for a file with a problem allows to disambiguate between multiple
input files.
Use generic term "AST file" because we don't always know a kind of the
provided file (for example, see `ASTReader::readASTFileControlBlock`).
rdar://65005546
Reland https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75912
The differences of this PR between
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75912 are:
- Fixed a regression in `Decl::isInAnotherModuleUnit()` in DeclBase.cpp
pointed by @mizvekov and add the corresponding test.
- Fixed the regression in windows
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/97447. The changes are in
`CodeGenModule::getVTableLinkage` from
`clang/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp`. According to the feedbacks from MSVC
devs, the linkage of vtables won't affected by modules. So I simply
skipped the case for MSVC.
Given this is more or less fundamental to the use of modules. I hope we
can backport this to 19.x.
By the OpenMP standard, `num_teams` clause can only accept one
expression (for now). In this patch, we extend it to allow to accept
multiple expressions when it is used with `target teams ompx_bare`
construct. This will allow to launch a multi-dim grid, same as CUDA/HIP.
HLSL has a set of intangible types which are described in in the
[draft HLSL Specification
(**[Basic.types]**)](https://microsoft.github.io/hlsl-specs/specs/hlsl.pdf):
There are special implementation-defined types such as handle types,
which fall into a category of standard intangible types. Intangible
types are types that have no defined object representation or value
representation, as such the size is unknown at compile time.
A class type T is an intangible class type if it contains an base
classes or members of intangible class type, standard intangible type,
or arrays of such types. Standard intangible types and intangible class
types are collectively called intangible
types([9](https://microsoft.github.io/hlsl-specs/specs/hlsl.html#Intangible)).
This PR implements one standard intangible type `__hlsl_resource_t`
and sets up the infrastructure that will make it easier to add more
in the future, such as samplers or raytracing payload handles. The
HLSL intangible types are declared in
`clang/include/clang/Basic/HLSLIntangibleTypes.def` and this file is
included with related macro definition in most places that require edits
when a new type is added.
The new types are added as keywords and not typedefs to make sure they
cannot be redeclared, and they can only be declared in builtin implicit
headers. The `__hlsl_resource_t` type represents a handle to a memory
resource and it is going to be used in builtin HLSL buffer types like this:
template <typename T>
class RWBuffer {
[[hlsl::contained_type(T)]]
[[hlsl::is_rov(false)]]
[[hlsl::resource_class(uav)]]
__hlsl_resource_t Handle;
};
Part 1/3 of llvm/llvm-project#90631.
---------
Co-authored-by: Justin Bogner <mail@justinbogner.com>
This is a minimal patch to support parsing for "omp assume" directives.
These are meant to be hints to a compiler's optimisers: as such, it is
legitimate (if not very useful) to ignore them. The patch builds on top
of the existing support for "omp assumes" directives (note spelling!).
Unlike the "omp [begin/end] assumes" directives, "omp assume" is
associated with a compound statement, i.e. it can appear within a
function. The "holds" assumption could (theoretically) be mapped onto
the existing builtin "__builtin_assume", though the latter applies to a
single point in the program, and the former to a range (i.e. the whole
of the associated compound statement).
This patch fixes sollve's OpenMP 5.1 "omp assume"-based tests.
Summary:
Macro like `va_start`/`va_end` marked as builtin functions that makes
these identifiers special and it results in redefinition of the
identifiers as builtins and it hides macro definitions during preloading
C++ modules. In case of modules Clang ignores special identifiers but
`PP.getCurrentModule()` was not set. This diff fixes IsModule detection
logic for this particular case.
Test Plan: check-clang
---------
Co-authored-by: Chuanqi Xu <yedeng.yd@linux.alibaba.com>
You can provide more than one AST file as an input. Emit a path for a
file with a problem, so you can disambiguate between multiple files.
rdar://65005546
Given "loop" construct, clang will try to treat it as "for",
"distribute" or "simd", depending on either the implied binding, or the
bind clause if present. This patch moves the code that performs this
construct remapping from sema to codegen.
For a "loop" construct without a bind clause, this patch will create an
implicit bind clause based on implied binding to simplify further
analysis.
During codegen the function `EmitOMPGenericLoopDirective` (i.e. "loop")
will invoke the "emit" functions for "for", "distribute" or "simd",
depending on the bind clause.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexey Bataev <a.bataev@gmx.com>
