Works towards P0619R4 / #99985.
The use of `std::get_temporary_buffer` and `std::return_temporary_buffer`
are replaced with `unique_ptr`-based RAII buffer holder.
Escape hatches:
- `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_TEMPORARY_BUFFER` restores
`std::get_temporary_buffer` and `std::return_temporary_buffer`.
Drive-by changes:
- In `<syncstream>`, states that `get_temporary_buffer` is now removed,
because `<syncstream>` is added in C++20.
`__has_cpp_attribute(__nodiscard__)` is always true now, so we might as
well replace `_LIBCPP_NODISCARD`. It's one less macro that can result in
bad diagnostics.
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
In preparation for running clang-format on the whole code base, we are
also removing mentions of the legacy _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY macro in
favor of the newer _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
We're still leaving the definition of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to avoid
creating needless breakage in case some older patches are checked-in
with mentions of the old macro. After we branch for LLVM 18, we can do
another pass to clean up remaining uses of the macro that might have
gotten introduced by mistake (if any) and remove the macro itself at the
same time. This is just a minor convenience to smooth out the transition
as much as possible.
See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
There is no reason to use `alignment_of<T>` instead of `alignof(T)` or
`_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF(T)`. It only makes the code more verbose and results in
slightly worse compile times.
This patch reverts the following commits:
015cd317eaed28a923d14a33c9d6739012a688be (add missing HIDE_FROM_ABI)
420a204d52205f1277a8d5df3dbafac6082e02e2 (add _LIBCPP_NO_CFI)
31eeba3f7c0e2ef4a21c07da9326a4ae1a8de7e2 (add __uninitialized_buffer)
It also reverts a small part of b935ab8e747cf52ff12471879460206a9f433eea
which is required to make the stable_partition.pass.cpp test pass on GCC.
Some issues were pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D152208 and
in https://reviews.llvm.org/D154017, so I am reverting this patch
until we have time to weigh the various solutions and get consensus
on the design of the API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154161
This will also be used in some PSTL backends.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Mordante
Spies: arichardson, mstorsjo, Mordante, sstefan1, jplehr, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152208
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
Basically a rebase of D104980; most of that patch had already happened
via gradual drive-by changes, but this finishes it up.
Don't touch the inclusions from `<__functional_base>`, `<__hash_table>`,
or `<__locale>`; those could be removed if we propagated the
inclusions up to the includers of those files, but there are lots
of those includers.
`<algorithm>`, `<functional>`, and `<memory>` already include `<utility>`
at the top level. `<iterator>` did not, so I've added it there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119020
This is a fairly mechanical change, it just moves each algorithm into
its own header. This is intended to be a NFC.
This commit re-applies 7ed7d4ccb899, which was reverted in 692d7166f771
because the Modules build got broken. The modules build has now been
fixed, so we're re-committing this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103583
Attribution note
----------------
I'm only committing this. This commit is a mix of D103583, D103330 and
D104171 authored by:
Co-authored-by: Christopher Di Bella <cjdb@google.com>
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
This is a fairly mechanical change, it just moves each algorithm into its own header. This is a NFC.
Note: during this change, I burned down all the includes, so this follows "include only and exactly what you use."
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103583
