Followup to D59363 which failed to handle the icmp(X,undef) -> isTrueWhenEqual case - similar to llvm::ConstantFoldCompareInstruction
As discussed on the review, this is affecting some previously reduced test cases, but will also prevent reductions from relying on this inconsistent behaviour in the future.
Reapplied after reversion at e1e3c75c7dad72 with a tweak to the pseudo-probe-peep.ll test
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158068
Followup to D59363 which failed to handle the icmp(X,undef) -> isTrueWhenEqual case - similar to llvm::ConstantFoldCompareInstruction
As discussed on the review, this is affecting some previously reduced test cases, but will also prevent reductions from relying on this inconsistent behaviour in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158068
The test case provided in PR45709 can be simplified by DCE to an
empty function. To prevent this from happening if DCE is run prior
to ISEL in the back end, just add optnone to the function. The
behaviour it is testing for is in the SDAG legalization and is
not sensitive to optnone so the test case still achieves its desired
objective.
As reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45709 we can hit an
infinite loop in legalization since we set the legalization action for
ISD::SELECT_CC for all fixed length vector types to Promote. Without some
different legalization action for the type being promoted to, the legalizer
simply loops. Since we don't have patterns to match the node, the right
legalization action should be Expand.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79854
