The requested register class priorities weren't respected
globally. Not sure why this is a target option, and not just the
expected behavior (recently added in
1a6dc92be7d68611077f0fb0b723b361817c950c). This avoids an allocation
failure when many wide tuple spills are introduced. I think this is a
workaround since I would not expect the allocation priority to be
required, and only a performance hint. The allocator should be smarter
about when only a subregister needs to be spilled and restored.
This does regress a couple of degenerate store stress lit tests which
shouldn't be too important.
This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert
it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I
converted all of the tests already, but likely missed a few).
Not sure what the exact syntax and policy should be. We can continue
printing the number of bytes for non-generic instructions to avoid
test churn and only allow non-scalar types for generic instructions.
This will currently print the LLT in parentheses, but accept parsing
the existing integers and implicitly converting to scalar. The
parentheses are a bit ugly, but the parser logic seems unable to deal
without either parentheses or some keyword to indicate the start of a
type.
Replace individual operands GLC, SLC, and DLC with a single cache_policy
bitmask operand. This will reduce the number of operands in MIR and I hope
the amount of code. These operands are mostly 0 anyway.
Additional advantage that parser will accept these flags in any order unlike
now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96469
Support for XNACK and SRAMECC is not static on some GPUs. We must be able
to differentiate between different scenarios for these dynamic subtarget
features.
The possible settings are:
- Unsupported: The GPU has no support for XNACK/SRAMECC.
- Any: Preference is unspecified. Use conservative settings that can run anywhere.
- Off: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC Off
- On: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC On
GCNSubtarget will track the four options based on the following criteria. If
the subtarget does not support XNACK/SRAMECC we say the setting is
"Unsupported". If no subtarget features for XNACK/SRAMECC are requested we
must support "Any" mode. If the subtarget features XNACK/SRAMECC exist in the
feature string when initializing the subtarget, the settings are "On/Off".
The defaults are updated to be conservatively correct, meaning if no setting
for XNACK or SRAMECC is explicitly requested, defaults will be used which
generate code that can be run anywhere. This corresponds to the "Any" setting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85882
When unbundling COPY bundles in VirtRegRewriter the start of the
bundle is not correctly referenced in the unbundling loop.
The effect of this is that unbundled instructions are sometimes
inserted out-of-order, particular in cases where multiple
reordering have been applied to avoid clobbering dependencies.
The resulting instruction sequence clobbers dependencies.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88821
When splitting a live interval with subranges, only insert copies for
the lanes that are live at the point of the split. This avoids some
unnecessary copies and fixes a problem where copying dead lanes was
generating MIR that failed verification. The test case for this is
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/splitkit-copy-live-lanes.mir.
Without this fix, some earlier live range splitting would create %430:
%430 [256r,848r:0)[848r,2584r:1) 0@256r 1@848r L0000000000000003 [848r,2584r:0) 0@848r L0000000000000030 [256r,2584r:0) 0@256r weight:1.480938e-03
...
256B undef %430.sub2:vreg_128 = V_LSHRREV_B32_e32 16, %20.sub1:vreg_128, implicit $exec
...
848B %430.sub0:vreg_128 = V_AND_B32_e32 %92:sreg_32, %20.sub1:vreg_128, implicit $exec
...
2584B %431:vreg_128 = COPY %430:vreg_128
Then RAGreedy::tryLocalSplit would split %430 into %432 and %433 just
before 848B giving:
%432 [256r,844r:0) 0@256r L0000000000000030 [256r,844r:0) 0@256r weight:3.066802e-03
%433 [844r,848r:0)[848r,2584r:1) 0@844r 1@848r L0000000000000030 [844r,2584r:0) 0@844r L0000000000000003 [844r,844d:0)[848r,2584r:1) 0@844r 1@848r weight:2.831776e-03
...
256B undef %432.sub2:vreg_128 = V_LSHRREV_B32_e32 16, %20.sub1:vreg_128, implicit $exec
...
844B undef %433.sub0:vreg_128 = COPY %432.sub0:vreg_128 {
internal %433.sub2:vreg_128 = COPY %432.sub2:vreg_128
848B }
%433.sub0:vreg_128 = V_AND_B32_e32 %92:sreg_32, %20.sub1:vreg_128, implicit $exec
...
2584B %431:vreg_128 = COPY %433:vreg_128
Note that the copy from %432 to %433 at 844B is a curious
bundle-without-a-BUNDLE-instruction that SplitKit creates deliberately,
and it includes a copy of .sub0 which is not live at this point, and
that causes it to fail verification:
*** Bad machine code: No live subrange at use ***
- function: zextload_global_v64i16_to_v64i64
- basic block: %bb.0 (0x7faed48) [0B;2848B)
- instruction: 844B undef %433.sub0:vreg_128 = COPY %432.sub0:vreg_128
- operand 1: %432.sub0:vreg_128
- interval: %432 [256r,844r:0) 0@256r L0000000000000030 [256r,844r:0) 0@256r weight:3.066802e-03
- at: 844B
Using real bundles with a BUNDLE instruction might also fix this
problem, but the current fix is less invasive and also avoids some
unnecessary copies.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47492
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87757
SplitKit forms invalid COPY subreg bundles without a leading
BUNDLE instruction. That manifests itself in post-RA scheduler
counting instruction and asserting on "Instruction count mismatch".
The bundle shall be undone by VirtRegRewriter::expandCopyBundle(),
but it does not because VirtRegRewriter::handleIdentityCopy() can
turn COPY bundle into a KILL bundle.
Process KILLs as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85484
