Similar to D108842, D108844, D108926, D108928, and D108936.
__has_builtin(builtin_mul_overflow) returns true for 32b RISCV targets,
but Clang is deferring to compiler RT when encountering long long types.
If the semantics of __has_builtin mean "the compiler resolves these,
always" then we shouldn't conditionally emit a libcall.
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28629
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108939
Similar to D108842, D108844, and D108926.
__has_builtin(builtin_mul_overflow) returns true for 32b PPC targets,
but Clang is deferring to compiler RT when encountering long long types.
This breaks ppc44x_defconfig + CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NBD=y builds of the Linux
kernel that are using builtin_mul_overflow with these types for these
targets.
If the semantics of __has_builtin mean "the compiler resolves these,
always" then we shouldn't conditionally emit a libcall.
This will still need to be worked around in the Linux kernel in order to
continue to support these builds of the Linux kernel for this
target with older releases of clang.
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28629
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1438
Reviewed By: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108936
As noted in the comments in D108227, using G_FPTOSI produces wrong results for
G_ISNAN. Drop the G_FPTOSI and perform the operation on integer types.
Elsewhere in LLVM, a bitcast would be the appropriate choice (as it is in SDAG).
GlobalISel does not distinguish between integer and FP types, so a bitcast would
be meaningless here.
This is an improvement over D107852. We don't need to enumerate specific
function names; we can just check for `noreturn` attribute. This also
requires us to make sure `__resumeExeption` and `emscripten_longjmp`
have `noreturn` attribute too; one of them is a JS function and the
other calls a JS function so Clang does not have a way to deduce they
don't return.
This is effectively NFC, because I'm not sure if there is an additional
case this case covers; if we add a custom function call that has
`noreturn` attribute, it will be processed within the SjLj handling and
turned into `__invoke` call. So this really applies to some special
functions like `emscripten_longjmp`.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108955
There are three kinds of "rethrowing" BBs in this pass:
1. In Emscripten SjLj, after a possibly longjmping function call, we
check if the thrown longjmp corresponds to one of setjmps within the
current function. If not, we rethrow the longjmp by calling
`emscripten_longjmp`.
2. In Emscripten EH, after a possibly throwing function call, we check
if the thrown exception corresponds to the current `catch` clauses.
If not, we rethrow the exception by calling `__resumeException`.
3. When both Emscripten EH and SjLj are used, when we check for an
exception after a possibly throwing function call, it is possible
that we get not an exception but a longjmp. In this case, we
shouldn't swallow it; we should rethrow the longjmp by calling
`emscripten_longjmp`.
4. When both Emscripten EH and SjLj are used, when we check for a
longjmp after a possibly longjmping function call, it is possible
that we get not a longjmp but an exception. In this case, we
shouldn't swallot it; we should rethrow the exception by calling
`__resumeException`.
Case 1 is in Emscripten SjLj, 2 is in Emscripten EH, and 3 and 4 are
relevant when both Emscripten EH and SjLj are used. 3 and 4 were first
implemented in D106525.
We create BBs for 1, 3, and 4 in this pass. We create those BBs for
every throwing/longjmping function call, along with other BBs that
contain condition checks. What this CL does is to create a single BB
within a function for each of 1, 3, and 4 cases. These BBs are exiting
BBs in the function and thus don't have successors, so easy to be shared
between calls.
The names of BBs created are:
Case 1: `call.em.longjmp`
Case 3: `rethrow.exn`
Case 4: `rethrow.longjmp`
For the case 2 we don't currently create BBs; we only replace the
existing `resume` instruction with `call @__resumeException`. And Clang
already creates only a single `resume` BB per function and reuses it,
so we don't need to optimize this case.
Not sure what are good benchmarks for EH/SjLj, but this decreases the
size of the object file for `grfmt_jpeg.bc` (presumably from opencv) we
got from one of our users by 8.9%. Even after running `wasm-opt -O4` on
them, there is still 4.8% improvement.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108945
In D87099, the mangler learned to quote export directives that contain
special characters. Only alhpanumerical characters as well as
'_', '$', '.' and '@' were exmpt from this quoting. However, at least
binutils considers an unquoted '.' to be syntax and object files
containing such symbols will cause errors during linking. Fix that
by removing '.' from the list of allowed exemptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100359
Instead of splitting off the fp16 to float conversion and generating
a libcall, we should split the operation into fp16 to float and float
to integer operations. This will allow the float to integer conversion
to go through any custom handling the target has. If the target doesn't
have custom handling then we should come back to ExpandIntRes_FP_TO_SINT/
ExpandIntRes_FP_TO_UINT automatically to create the libcall.
This avoids generating libcalls on 32-bit X86. These library functions may
not exist in 32-bit libgcc. At least for LLVM, we never generate them when
hardware floating point instructions are available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108933
When expanding a SMULFIXSAT ISD node (usually originating from
a smul.fix.sat intrinsic) we've applied some optimizations for
the special case when the scale is zero. The idea has been that
it would be cheaper to use an SMULO instruction (if legal) to
perform the multiplication and at the same time detect any overflow.
And in case of overflow we could use some SELECT:s to replace the
result with the saturated min/max value. The only tricky part
is to know if we overflowed on the min or max value, i.e. if the
product is positive or negative. Unfortunately the implementation
has been incorrect as it has looked at the product returned by the
SMULO to determine the sign of the product. In case of overflow that
product is truncated and won't give us the correct sign bit.
This patch is adding an extra XOR of the multiplication operands,
which is used to determine the sign of the non truncated product.
This patch fixes PR51677.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108938
It looks like this array was missed in 4276d4a8d08b7640eb57cabf6988a5cf65b228b6
Fixed tests that expected `elements` to be empty or depeneded on the order of the empty DINode.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107024
The check for whether a rotate is possible occurs before the
memory legality checks for the integer type. So it's possible we
decide we can use a rotate, but then fail the legality checks. If
that happens we should not fall back to a vector type. This triggers
an assertion in the rotate handling when it finds a vector type
instead of an integer type.
In theory we could use a shufflevector in place of the rotate, but
right now I'd just like to fix the crash.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108839
PowerPC can model these instructions, so we don't need this flag set.
Reviewed By: shchenz, jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71983
A new kind BTF_KIND_TAG is added to .BTF to encode
btf_tag attributes. The format looks like
CommonType.name : attribute string
CommonType.type : attached to a struct/union/func/var.
CommonType.info : encoding BTF_KIND_TAG
kflag == 1 to indicate the attribute is
for CommonType.type, or kflag == 0
for struct/union member or func argument.
one uint32_t : to encode which member/argument starting from 0.
If one particular type or member/argument has more than one attribute,
multiple BTF_KIND_TAG will be generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106622
If the icmp is in a different block, then the register for the icmp
operand may not be initialized, as it nominally does not have
cross-block uses. Add a check that the icmp is in the same block
as the branch, which should be the common case.
This matches what X86 FastISel does:
5b6b090cf2/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp (L1648)
The "not" transform that could have a similar issue is dropped
entirely, because it is currently dead: The incoming value is
a branch or select condition of type i1, but this code requires
an i32 to trigger.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51651.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108840
__has_builtin(__builtin_mul_overflow) returns true for 32b MIPS targets,
but Clang is deferring to compiler RT when encountering `long long`
types. This breaks sanitizer builds of the Linux kernel that are using
__builtin_mul_overflow with these types for these targets.
If the semantics of __has_builtin mean "the compiler resolves these,
always" then we shouldn't conditionally emit a libcall.
This will still need to be worked around in the Linux kernel in order to
continue to support malta_defconfig builds of the Linux kernel for this
target with older releases of clang.
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28629
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1438
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108844
__has_builtin(__builtin_mul_overflow) returns true for 32b ARM targets,
but Clang is deferring to compiler RT when encountering `long long`
types. This breaks sanitizer builds of the Linux kernel that are using
__builtin_mul_overflow with these types for these targets.
If the semantics of __has_builtin mean "the compiler resolves these,
always" then we shouldn't conditionally emit a libcall.
This will still need to be worked around in the Linux kernel in order to
continue to support allmodconfig builds of the Linux kernel for this
target with older releases of clang.
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28629
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1438
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108842
This fixes another reproducer from https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51615
And again, the fix lies not in the code added in D105390
In this case, we completely don't check that the "broadcast-from-mem" we create
can actually fold the load. In this case, it's operand was not a load at all:
```
Combining: t16: v8i32 = vector_shuffle<0,u,u,u,0,u,u,u> t14, undef:v8i32
Creating new node: t29: i32 = undef
RepeatLoad:
t8: i32 = truncate t7
t7: i64 = extract_vector_elt t5, Constant:i64<0>
t5: v2i64,ch = load<(load (s128) from %ir.arg)> t0, t2, undef:i64
t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0
t1: i64 = Register %0
t4: i64 = undef
t3: i64 = Constant<0>
Combining: t15: v8i32 = undef
```
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108821
This adds an ELEN limit for fixed length vectors. This will scalarize
any elements larger than this. It will also disable some fractional
LMULs. For example, if ELEN=32 then mf8 becomes illegal, i32/f32
vectors can't use any fractional LMULs, i16/f16 can only use mf2,
and i8 can use mf2 and mf4.
We may also need something for the scalable vectors, but that has
interactions with the intrinsics and we can't scalarize a scalable
vector.
Longer term this should come from one of the Zve* features
For vectors that are exactly equal to getMaxSVEVectorSizeInBits, just use
AArch64SVEPredPattern::all, which can enable the use of unpredicated ptrue when available.
TestPlan: check-llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108706
x86_fp80 format allows values that do not fit any of IEEE-754 category.
Previously they were recognized by intrinsic __builtin_isnan as NaNs.
Now this intrinsic is implemented using instruction FXAM, which
distinguish between NaNs and unsupported values. It can make some
programs behave differently.
As a solution, this fix changes lowering of the intrinsic. If floating
point exceptions are ignored, llvm.isnan is lowered into unordered
comparison, as __buildtin_isnan was implemented earlier. In strictfp
functions the intrinsic is lowered using FXAM, which does not raise
exceptions even for signaling NaN, as required by IEEE-754 and C
standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108037
Without this change only the preferred fusion opcode is tested
when attempting to combine FMA operations.
If both FMA and FMAD are available then FMA ops formed prior to
legalization will not be merged post legalization as FMAD becomes
the preferred fusion opcode.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108619
In a future patch, a new set of amdgpu-no-* attributes will be
introduced to indicate when a function does not need an implicitly
passed input. This pass introduces new instances of these intrinsic
calls, and should remove the attributes if they were present before.
Switch to using BitIntegerState for each of the inputs, and invert
their meanings.
This now diverges more from the old AMDGPUAnnotateKernelFeatures, but
this isn't used yet anyway.
We only really want this to add the custom attributes. Theoretically
the regular transforms were already run at this point. Touching
undefined behavior breaks a lot of tests when this is enabled by
default, many of which are expecting to test handling of undef
operations.
amdgpu-calls and amdgpu-stack-objects don't really belong as
attributes, and are currently a hacky way of passing an analysis into
the DAG. These don't really belong in the IR, and don't really fit in
with the other attributes. Remove these to facilitate inverting the
pass.
I don't exactly understand the indirect call test changes. These tests
are using calls which are trivially replacable with a direct call, so
I'm not sure what the point is.
When doing Emscritpen EH, if SjLj is also enabled and used and if the
thrown exception has a possiblity being a longjmp instead of an
exception, we shouldn't swallow it; we should rethrow, or relay it. It
was done in D106525 and the code is here:
8441a8eea8/llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp (L858-L898)
Here is the pseudocode of that part: (copied from comments)
```
if (%__THREW__.val == 0 || %__THREW__.val == 1)
goto %tail
else
goto %longjmp.rethrow
longjmp.rethrow: ;; This is longjmp. Rethrow it
%__threwValue.val = __threwValue
emscripten_longjmp(%__THREW__.val, %__threwValue.val);
tail: ;; Nothing happened or an exception is thrown
... Continue exception handling ...
```
If the current BB (where the `invoke` is created) has successors that
has the current BB as its PHI incoming node, now that has to change to
`tail` in the pseudocode, because `tail` is the latest BB that is
connected with the next BB, but this was missing.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108785
This pattern
```
%elt = ... something ...
%undef = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
%vec = G_BUILD_VECTOR %elt, %undef, %undef, ... %undef
```
Can be selected to a SUBREG_TO_REG, assuming `%elt` and `%vec` have the same
register bank. We don't care about any of the bits in `%vec` aside from those
in `%elt`, which just happens to be the 0th element.
This is preferable to emitting `mov` instructions for every index.
This gives minor code size improvements on the test suite at -Os.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108773
Similar to what we do for add/sub/mul.
This can help remove some sext.w. There are some regressions on
some bswap tests, but I have an idea how to fix that for a follow up.
A new PACKW pattern is added to handle the new sext_inreg placement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108663
On targets requiring VGPR alignment we may end up spilling an
unaligned register if we were partially spilled odd number of
leading lanes. The reminder will start with an odd register.
This problem is solved by inverting the order of lanes to
be spillied so that we start from the end.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108732
We can halve the number of mask constants by masking before shl
and after srl.
This can reduce the number of mov immediate or constant
materializations. Or reduce the number of constant pool loads
for X86 vectors.
I think we might be able to do something similar for bswap. I'll
look at it next.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108738
A post-commit review comment on https://reviews.llvm.org/D107452 pointed out that
https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html
says:
"In a function that uses the constrained intrinsics the strictfp attribute is required on all function calls."
Although there are several files across several test directories which don't follow this guidance, it is straightforward to provide this attribute.
Reviewed By: kpn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107567
Even though https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51615
appears to be introduced by D105390, the fix lies here.
We can not replace a wide volatile load with a broadcast-from-memory,
because that would narrow the load, which isn't legal for volatiles.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108757
