Originally committed as ffc3fb665d0a0dccd64cc8c803ad8cc1a0d5dfa1
Reverted in fcf2d5f40296be4e0f0e954001beb7814f97a212 due to an
assertion failure.
Original commit message:
Allow the folding even if there is an
intervening bitcast.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106667
Currently, the default alignment is much larger than the actual size of
the vector in memory. Fix this to use a sane default.
For SVE, temporarily remove lowering of load/store operations for
predicates with less than 16 elements. The layout the backend was
assuming for SVE predicates with less than 16 elements doesn't agree
with the frontend. More work probably needs to be done here.
This change is, strictly speaking, not backwards-compatible at the
bitcode level. But probably nobody is actually depending on that; i1
vectors in memory are rare, and the code that does use them probably
ends up forcing the alignment to something sane anyway. If we think
this is a concern, I can restrict this to scalable vectors for now
(where it's actually causing issues for me at the moment).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88994
I don't know much about this pass, but we need a stronger
check on the memset length arg to avoid an assert. The
current code was added with D59000.
The test is reduced from:
https://llvm.org/PR50910
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106462
SROA sometimes preserves MD_mem_parallel_loop_access and MD_access_group metadata on loads/stores, and sometimes fails to do so. This change adds copying of the MD after other CreateAlignedLoad/CreateAlignedStores. Also fix a case where the metadata was being copied from a load, rather than the store.
Added a LIT test to catch one case.
Patch by Mark Mendell
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103254
Upon encountering loads/stores on types whose size is not a multiple of 8 bits the SROA pass would either trip an assertion or use logic that was not meant to work with such irregularly-sized types.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99435
Upon encountering loads/stores on types whose size is not a multiple of 8 bits the SROA pass would either trip an assertion or use logic that was not meant to work with such irregularly-sized types.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99435
Since d6de1e1a71406c75a4ea4d5a2fe84289f07ea3a1, no attributes is quivalent to
setting attribute to false.
This is a preliminary commit for https://reviews.llvm.org/D99080
This was reverted to mitigate mitigate miscompiles caused by
the logical and/or to bitwise and/or fold. Reapply it now that
the underlying issue has been fixed by D101191.
-----
This patch folds more operations to poison.
Alive2 proof: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/mxcb9G (it does not contain tests about div/rem because they fold to poison when raising UB)
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92270
Printing pass manager invocations is fairly verbose and not super
useful.
This allows us to remove DebugLogging from pass managers and PassBuilder
since all logging (aside from analysis managers) goes through
instrumentation now.
This has the downside of never being able to print the top level pass
manager via instrumentation, but that seems like a minor downside.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101797
SROA shifts TBAA nodes in a way that may present a problem for !tbaa but not !tbaa.struct nodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99851
When we are able to SROA an alloca, we know all uses of it, meaning we
don't have to preserve the invariant group intrinsics and metadata.
It's possible that we could lose information regarding redundant
loads/stores, but that's unlikely to have any real impact since right
now the only user is Clang and vtables.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99760
SROA does not correctly account for offsets in TBAA/TBAA struct metadata.
This patch creates functionality for generating new MD with the corresponding
offset and updates SROA to use this functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95826
As mentioned in D93793, there are quite a few places where unary `IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector(X, Mask)` can be used
instead of `IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector(X, Undef, Mask)`.
Let's update them.
Actually, it would have been more natural if the patches were made in this order:
(1) let them use unary CreateShuffleVector first
(2) update IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector to use poison as a placeholder value (D93793)
The order is swapped, but in terms of correctness it is still fine.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93923
This fixes the bug 47945. It is legal to have a PHI with values
from from the same block, but values must stay the same. In this
case it is illegal to merge different values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89978
And another step towards transformss not introducing inttoptr and/or
ptrtoint casts that weren't there already.
In this case, when load/store uses have conflicting types,
instead of falling back to the iN, we can try to use allocated sub-type.
As disscussed, this isn't the best idea overall (we shouldn't rely on
allocated type), but it works fine as a temporary measure.
I've measured, and @ `-O3` as of vanilla llvm test-suite + RawSpeed,
this results in +0.05% more bitcasts, -5.51% less inttoptr
and -1.05% less ptrtoint (at the end of middle-end opt pipeline)
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47592
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88788
This patch fixes this crash https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/Ps8d1e
And gives SROA the ability to remove assumes if it allows promoting an alloca to register
Without removing assumes when it can't promote to register.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86570
When visiting load and store instructions in SROA skip scalable vectors.
This is relevant in the implementation of the 'arm_sve_vector_bits'
attribute that is used to define VLS types, where an alloca of a
fixed-length vector could be bitcasted to scalable. See D85128 for more
information.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85725
It is technically legal for optimizations to create an alloca that is
used by more than one dbg.declare, if one or both of them are inlined
instances of aliasing variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85172
If an analysis is actually invalidated, there's already a log statement
for that: 'Invalidating analysis: FooAnalysis'.
Otherwise the statement is not very useful.
Reviewed By: asbirlea, ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84981
This is the second of two patches to address PR46753. We basically allow
SROA to promote allocas that are used in doppable instructions, for
now that means `llvm.assume`. The (transitive) uses are replaced by
`undef` in the droppable instructions.
See also D83976.
Reviewed By: Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83978
SROA knows that it can look through addrspacecast but
PromoteMemoryToRegister did not handle them. This caused an assertion
error for the test case, exposed while running
`Transforms/PhaseOrdering/inlining-alignment-assumptions.ll` with D83978
applied.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84085
Provided test case crashes otherwise.
If NewTy is already DL.getIntPtrType(NewTy),
CreateBitCast() won't actually create any bitcast,
so we are better off just doing the general thing.
Summary:
- When promoting a pointer from memory to register, SROA skips pointers
from different address spaces. However, as `ptrtoint` and `inttoptr`
are defined as no-op casts if that integer type has the same as the
pointer value, generate the pair of `ptrtoint`/`inttoptr` (no-op cast)
sequence to convert pointers from different address spaces if they
have the same size.
Reviewers: arsenm, chandlerc, lebedev.ri
Subscribers:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81943
Slice::operator<() has a non-deterministic behavior. If we have
identical slices comparison will depend on the order or operands.
Normally that does not result in unstable compilation results
because the order in which slices are inserted into the vector
is deterministic and llvm::sort() normally behaves as a stable
sort, although that is not guaranteed.
However, there is test option -sroa-random-shuffle-slices which
is used to check exactly this aspect. The vector is first randomly
shuffled and then sorted. The same shuffling happens without this
option under expensive llvm checks.
I have managed to write a test which has hit this problem.
There are no fields in the Slice class to resolve the instability.
We only have offsets, IsSplittable and Use, but neither Use nor
User have anything suitable for predictable comparison.
I have switched to stable_sort which has to be sufficient and
removed that randon shuffle option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81310
Along the lines of D77454 and D79968. Unlike loads and stores, the
default alignment is getPrefTypeAlign, to match the existing handling in
various places, including SelectionDAG and InstCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80044
For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the
datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR
later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the
datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default
datalayout.
The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow
overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this,
some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target.
Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new
machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the
datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information
from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools
to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time.
Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback.
(clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at
least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a
datalayout is not something frontends should generate.
This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen
regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with
a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the
overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the
default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one
AMDGPU test.
Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just
fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
