Rebase of #84114. I've only included the core changes to frame layout
calculation & CFI generation which sidesteps the regressions found after
merging #84114. Since these changes are a necessary precursor to the
overall fix and are themselves slightly beneficial as CFI is now
generated correctly, I think it is reasonable to merge this first step.
---
For very large stack frames, the offset from the stack pointer to a
local can be more than 2^31 which overflows various `int` offsets in the
frame lowering code.
This patch updates the frame lowering code to calculate the offsets as
64-bit values and fixes CFI to use the corrected sizes.
After this patch, additional work is needed to fix offset truncations in
each target's codegen.
For very large stack frames, the offset from the stack pointer to a local can be more than 2^31 which overflows various `int` offsets in the frame lowering code.
This patch updates the frame lowering code to calculate the offsets as 64-bit values and resolves the overflows, resulting in the correct codegen for very large frames.
Fixes#48911
- Use computeMaxCallFrameSize() in PEI::calculateCallFrameInfo() instead of duplicating the code.
- Set AdjustsStack in FinalizeISel instead of in computeMaxCallFrameSize().
This is an alternative to fix PR57939 for RISC-V. It definitely
can be argued that the stack temporaries for RISC-V are being created
with an unnecessarily large alignment. But ignoring the alignment
in MachineFrameInfo also seems bad.
Looking at the test update that go with the current ID==0 check,
it was intending to exclude things like the NoAlloc stackid. So I'm
not sure if scalable vectors are intentionally being excluded.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135913
Currently needsStackRealignment returns false if canRealignStack returns false.
This means that the behavior of needsStackRealignment does not correspond to
it's name and description; a function might need stack realignment, but if it
is not possible then this function returns false. Furthermore,
needsStackRealignment is not virtual and therefore some backends have made use
of canRealignStack to indicate whether a function needs stack realignment.
This patch attempts to clarify the situation by separating them and introducing
new names:
- shouldRealignStack - true if there is any reason the stack should be
realigned
- canRealignStack - true if we are still able to realign the stack (e.g. we
can still reserve/have reserved a frame pointer)
- hasStackRealignment = shouldRealignStack && canRealignStack (not target
customisable)
Targets can now override shouldRealignStack to indicate that stack realignment
is required.
This change will make it easier in a future change to handle the case where we
need to realign the stack but can't do so (for example when the register
allocator creates an aligned spill after the frame pointer has been
eliminated).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98716
Change-Id: Ib9a4d21728bf9d08a545b4365418d3ffe1af4d87
Summary:
This is a roll forward of D77394 minus AlignmentFromAssumptions (which needs to be addressed separately)
Differences from D77394:
- DebugStr() now prints the alignment value or `None` and no more `Align(x)` or `MaybeAlign(x)`
- This is to keep Warning message consistent (CodeGen/SystemZ/alloca-04.ll)
- Removed a few unneeded headers from Alignment (since it's included everywhere it's better to keep the dependencies to a minimum)
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: sdardis, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77537
Summary:
This is a follow up on https://reviews.llvm.org/D71473#inline-647262.
There's a caveat here that `Align(1)` relies on the compiler understanding of `Log2_64` implementation to produce good code. One could use `Align()` as a replacement but I believe it is less clear that the alignment is one in that case.
Reviewers: xbolva00, courbet, bollu
Subscribers: arsenm, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, Jim, kerbowa, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73099
Summary:
This patch fixes a few issues when large arrays are allocated on the
stack. Currently, clang has inconsistent behaviour, for debug builds
there is an assertion failure when the array size on stack is around 2GB
but there is no assertion when the stack is around 8GB. For release
builds there is no assertion, the compilation succeeds but generates
incorrect code. The incorrect code generated is due to using
int/unsigned int instead of their 64-bit counterparts. This patch,
1) Removes the assertion in frame legality check.
2) Converts int/unsigned int in some places to the 64-bit variants. This
helps in generating correct code and removes the inconsistent behaviour.
3) Adds a test which runs without optimisations.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, fhahn, aemerson
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: eli.friedman, fpetrogalli, kristof.beyls, hiraditya,
llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70496
This patch changes MIR stack-id from an integer to an enum,
and adds printing/parsing support for this in MIR files. The default
stack-id '0' is now renamed to 'default'.
This should make MIR tests that have stack objects with different stack-ids
more descriptive. It also clarifies code operating on StackID.
Reviewers: arsenm, thegameg, qcolombet
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60137
llvm-svn: 363533
There are various places in LLVM where the definition of StackID is not
properly honoured, for example in PEI where objects with a StackID > 0 are
allocated on the default stack (StackID0). This patch enforces that PEI
only considers allocating objects to StackID 0.
Reviewers: arsenm, thegameg, MatzeB
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60062
llvm-svn: 357460
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
See r331124 for how I made a list of files missing the include.
I then ran this Python script:
for f in open('filelist.txt'):
f = f.strip()
fl = open(f).readlines()
found = False
for i in xrange(len(fl)):
p = '#include "llvm/'
if not fl[i].startswith(p):
continue
if fl[i][len(p):] > 'Config':
fl.insert(i, '#include "llvm/Config/llvm-config.h"\n')
found = True
break
if not found:
print 'not found', f
else:
open(f, 'w').write(''.join(fl))
and then looked through everything with `svn diff | diffstat -l | xargs -n 1000 gvim -p`
and tried to fix include ordering and whatnot.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 331184
Consistently use the same parameter names as the names of the affected
fields. This avoids some unintuitive abbreviations like `isSS`.
llvm-svn: 319722
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
This header already includes a CodeGen header and is implemented in
lib/CodeGen, so move the header there to match.
This fixes a link error with modular codegeneration builds - where a
header and its implementation are circularly dependent and so need to be
in the same library, not split between two like this.
llvm-svn: 317379
Summary:
Add LLVM_FORCE_ENABLE_DUMP cmake option, and use it along with
LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS to set LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP.
Remove NDEBUG and only use LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP to enable dump methods.
Move definition of LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP from config.h to llvm-config.h so
it'll be picked up by public headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38406
llvm-svn: 315590
On AMDGPU SGPR spills are really spilled to another register.
The spiller creates the spills to new frame index objects,
which is used as a placeholder.
This will eventually be replaced with a reference to a position
in a VGPR to write to and the frame index deleted. It is
most likely not a real stack location that can be shared
with another stack object.
This is a problem when StackSlotColoring decides it should
combine a frame index used for a normal VGPR spill with
a real stack location and a frame index used for an SGPR.
Add an ID field so that StackSlotColoring has a way
of knowing the different frame index types are
incompatible.
llvm-svn: 308673
This exposes a method in MachineFrameInfo that calculates
MaxCallFrameSize and calls it after instruction selection in the ARM
target.
This avoids
ARMBaseRegisterInfo::canRealignStack()/ARMFrameLowering::hasReservedCallFrame()
giving different answers in early/late phases of codegen.
The testcase shows a particular nasty example result of that where we
would fail to properly align an alloca.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32622
llvm-svn: 302303
