Rename the function to reflect its correct behavior and to be consistent
with `Module::getOrInsertFunction`. This is also in preparation of
adding a new `Intrinsic::getDeclaration` that will have behavior similar
to `Module::getFunction` (i.e, just lookup, no creation).
Pass EarliestEscapeInfo to BatchAA in MemCpyOpt. This allows memcpy
elimination in cases where one of the involved pointers is captured
after the relevant memcpy/call.
We currently elide memcpys for readonly nocapture noalias arguments.
noalias is checked to make sure that there are no other ways to write
the memory, e.g. through a different argument or an escaped pointer.
In addition to the current noalias check, also query alias analysis, in
case it can prove that modification is not possible through other means.
This fixes the problem reported in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/problem-about-memcpy-elimination/81121.
For the case where the memcpy size is zero, this transform is a complex
no-op. This can lead to an infinite loop when the size is zero in a way
that BasicAA understands, because it can still understand that dst and
dst + src_size are MustAlias.
I've tried to mitigate this before using the isZeroSize() check, but we
can hit cases where InstSimplify doesn't understand that the size is
zero, but BasicAA does.
As such, this bites the bullet and adds an explicit isKnownNonZero()
check to guard against no-op transforms.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/98610.
This is a helper to avoid writing `getModule()->getDataLayout()`. I
regularly try to use this method only to remember it doesn't exist...
`getModule()->getDataLayout()` is also a common (the most common?)
reason why code has to include the Module.h header.
Without this change, the included test cases crash the compiler. I
believe this is fallout from the homogenous scalable struct work from a
while back; I think we just forgot to update this case.
Likely to fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/80463.
It seems TypeSize is currently broken in the sense that:
TypeSize::Fixed(4) + TypeSize::Scalable(4) => TypeSize::Fixed(8)
without failing its assert that explicitly tests for this case:
assert(LHS.Scalable == RHS.Scalable && ...);
The reason this fails is that `Scalable` is a static method of class
TypeSize,
and LHS and RHS are both objects of class TypeSize. So this is
evaluating
if the pointer to the function Scalable == the pointer to the function
Scalable,
which is always true because LHS and RHS have the same class.
This patch fixes the issue by renaming `TypeSize::Scalable` ->
`TypeSize::getScalable`, as well as `TypeSize::Fixed` to
`TypeSize::getFixed`,
so that it no longer clashes with the variable in
FixedOrScalableQuantity.
The new methods now also better match the coding standard, which
specifies that:
* Variable names should be nouns (as they represent state)
* Function names should be verb phrases (as they represent actions)
Call slot optimization may introduce writes to the destination object
that occur earlier than in the original function. We currently already
check that that the destination is dereferenceable and aligned, but we
do not make sure that it is writable. As such, we might introduce a
write to read-only memory, or introduce a data race.
Fix this by checking that the object is writable. For arguments, this is
indicated by the new writable attribute. Tests using
sret/dereferenceable are updated to use it.
Relocate the GEP modification to a later stage of the function
performCallSlotOptzn(), ensuring that the code remains unchanged if the
optimization fails.
Co-authored-by: aklkaiyan <aklkaiyan@tencent.com>
…ptzn.
This changes performStackMoveOptzn to take a TypeSize instead of
uint64_t to avoid an implicit conversion when called from
processStoreOfLoad.
performStackMoveOptzn has been updated to allow scalable types in the
rest of its code.
Given that transition to opaque pointers a call to CreatePointerCast
in processMemSetMemCpyDependence was found redundant. It would cast
from "ptr" to "ptr" (both associated with the same address space).
Stack-move optimization, the optimization that merges src and dest
alloca of the full-size copy, replaces all uses of the dest alloca with
src alloca. For safety, we needed to check all uses of the dest alloca
locations are dominated by src alloca, to be replaced. This PR adds the
check for that.
Fixes#65225
This adds an additional transform to drop zero-size memcpys, also in
the case where the size is only zero after instruction simplification.
The motivation is the case from PR54983 where the size is non-trivially
zero, and processMemSetMemCpyDependence() keeps trying to reduce the
memset size by zero bytes.
This fix it's not really principled. It only works on the premise that
if InstSimplify doesn't realize the size is zero, then AA also won't.
The principled approach would be to instead add a isKnownNonZero()
guard to the processMemSetMemCpyDependence() transform, but I
suspect that would render that optimization mostly useless (at least
it breaks all the existing test coverage -- worth noting that the
constant size case is also handled by DSE, so I think this transform
is primarily about the dynamic size case).
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54983.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64886.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124078
This reverts commit 3bb32c61b2f1f5d14dd056dd198dc898dce5a44e.
Use InsertionPt for DT to handle non-memory access dominators
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155406
New memory accesses are usually inserted by using one of the
createMemoryAccessXYZ() methods followed by insertUse() or
insertDef(). createMemoryAccessXYZ() accepts a defining access,
however this defining access will always be overwritten by
insertUse() / insertDef().
Update the documentation to clarify this, and stop passing
Definition to createMemoryAccessXYZ() if it's followed by
insertUse/insertDef.
Alternatively, we could also make insertUse / insertDef keep the
defining access if it is specified, and only recompute it if it's
missing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157979
