This patch adds a new descendant to the SymExpr hierarchy. This way, now
we can assign constraints to symbolic unary expressions. Only the unary
minus and bitwise negation are handled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125318
This PR changes the `SymIntExpr` so the expression that uses a
negative value as `RHS`, for example: `x +/- (-N)`, is modeled as
`x -/+ N` instead.
This avoids producing a very large `RHS` when the symbol is cased to
an unsigned number, and as consequence makes the value more robust in
presence of casts.
Note that this change is not applied if `N` is the lowest negative
value for which negation would not be representable.
Reviewed By: steakhal
Patch By: tomasz-kaminski-sonarsource!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124658
It seems like multiple users are affected by a crash introduced by this
commit, thus I'm reverting it for the time being.
Read more about the found reproducers at Phabricator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124658
This reverts commit f0d6cb4a5cf5723d7ddab2c7dab74f2f62116a6d.
This PR changes the `SymIntExpr` so the expression that uses a
negative value as `RHS`, for example: `x +/- (-N)`, is modeled as
`x -/+ N` instead.
This avoids producing a very large `RHS` when the symbol is cased to
an unsigned number, and as consequence makes the value more robust in
presence of casts.
Note that this change is not applied if `N` is the lowest negative
value for which negation would not be representable.
Reviewed By: steakhal
Patch By: tomasz-kaminski-sonarsource!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124658
This change fixes an assert that occurs in the SMT layer when refuting a
finding that uses pointers of two different sizes. This was found in a
downstream build that supports two different pointer sizes, The CString
Checker was attempting to compute an overlap for the 'to' and 'from'
pointers, where the pointers were of different sizes.
In the downstream case where this was found, a specialized memcpy
routine patterned after memcpy_special is used. The analyzer core hits
on this builtin because it matches the 'memcpy' portion of that builtin.
This cannot be duplicated in the upstream test since there are no
specialized builtins that match that pattern, but the case does
reproduce in the accompanying LIT test case. The amdgcn target was used
for this reproducer. See the documentation for AMDGPU address spaces here
https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUUsage.html#address-spaces.
The assert seen is:
`*Solver->getSort(LHS) == *Solver->getSort(RHS) && "AST's must have the same sort!"'
Ack to steakhal for reviewing the fix, and creating the test case.
Reviewed By: steakhal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118050
Add the capability to simplify more complex constraints where there are 3
symbols in the tree. In this change I extend simplifySVal to query constraints
of children sub-symbols in a symbol tree. (The constraint for the parent is
asked in getKnownValue.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103317
Make the SValBuilder capable to simplify existing
SVals based on a newly added constraints when evaluating a BinOp.
Before this patch, we called `simplify` only in some edge cases.
However, we can and should investigate the constraints in all cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113753
Make the SimpleSValBuilder capable to simplify existing IntSym
expressions based on a newly added constraint on the sub-expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113754
Stop using APInt constructors and methods that were soft-deprecated in
D109483. This fixes all the uses I found in clang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110808
`SVB.getStateManager().getOwningEngine().getAnalysisManager().getAnalyzerOptions()`
is quite a mouthful and might involve a few pointer indirections to get
such a simple thing like an analyzer option.
This patch introduces an `AnalyzerOptions` reference to the `SValBuilder`
abstract class, while refactors a few cases to use this /simpler/ accessor.
Reviewed By: martong, Szelethus
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108824
Summary: Remove dispatchCast, evalCastFromNonLoc and evalCastFromLoc functions since their functionality has been moved to common evalCast function. Use evalCast instead.
Post-clean up patch for https://reviews.llvm.org/D96090 patch. The patch shall not change any behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97277
Summary: Move logic from CastRetrievedVal to evalCast and replace CastRetrievedVal with evalCast. Also move guts from SimpleSValBuilder::dispatchCast inside evalCast.
evalCast intends to substitute dispatchCast, evalCastFromNonLoc and evalCastFromLoc in the future. OriginalTy provides additional information for casting, which is useful for some cases and useless for others. If `OriginalTy.isNull()` is true, then cast performs based on CastTy only. Now evalCast operates in two ways. It retains all previous behavior and take over dispatchCast behavior. dispatchCast, evalCastFromNonLoc and evalCastFromLoc is considered as buggy since it doesn't take into account OriginalTy of the SVal and should be improved.
From this patch use evalCast instead of dispatchCast, evalCastFromNonLoc and evalCastFromLoc functions. dispatchCast redirects to evalCast.
This patch shall not change any behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96090
Currently, we infer 0 if the divisible of the modulo op is 0:
int a = x < 0; // a can be 0
int b = a % y; // b is either 1 % sym or 0
However, we don't when the op is / :
int a = x < 0; // a can be 0
int b = a / y; // b is either 1 / sym or 0 / sym
This commit fixes the discrepancy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99343
This fix unifies all of the different ways we handled pointer to
members into one. The crash was caused by the fact that the type
of pointer-to-member values was `void *`, and while this works
for the vast majority of cases it breaks when we actually need
to explain the path for the report.
rdar://problem/64202361
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85817
Summary: Simplify functions SVal::getAsSymbolicExpression SVal::getAsSymExpr and SVal::getAsSymbol. After revision I concluded that `getAsSymbolicExpression` and `getAsSymExpr` repeat functionality of `getAsSymbol`, thus them can be removed.
Fix: Remove functions SVal::getAsSymbolicExpression and SVal::getAsSymExpr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85034
Summary:
New logic tries to narrow possible result values of the remainder operation
based on its operands and their ranges. It also tries to be conservative
with negative operands because according to the standard the sign of
the result is implementation-defined.
rdar://problem/44978988
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80117
The `SubEngine` interface is an interface with only one implementation
`EpxrEngine`. Adding other implementations are difficult and very
unlikely in the near future. Currently, if anything from `ExprEngine` is
to be exposed to other classes it is moved to `SubEngine` which
restricts the alternative implementations. The virtual methods are have
a slight perofrmance impact. Furthermore, instead of the `LLVM`-style
inheritance a native inheritance is used here, which renders `LLVM`
functions like e.g. `cast<T>()` unusable here. This patch removes this
interface and allows usage of `ExprEngine` directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80548
Summary:
When comparing a symbolic region and a constant, the constant would be
widened or truncated to the width of a void pointer, meaning that the
constant could be incorrectly truncated when handling symbols for
non-default address spaces. In the attached test case this resulted in a
false positive since the constant was truncated to zero. To fix this,
widen/truncate the constant to the width of the symbol expression's
type.
This commit does not consider non-symbolic regions as I'm not sure how
to generalize getting the type there.
This fixes PR40814.
Reviewers: NoQ, zaks.anna, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, jdoerfert, Charusso, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58665
llvm-svn: 355592
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
In earlier patches regarding AnalyzerOptions, a lot of effort went into
gathering all config options, and changing the interface so that potential
misuse can be eliminited.
Up until this point, AnalyzerOptions only evaluated an option when it was
querried. For example, if we had a "-no-false-positives" flag, AnalyzerOptions
would store an Optional field for it that would be None up until somewhere in
the code until the flag's getter function is called.
However, now that we're confident that we've gathered all configs, we can
evaluate off of them before analysis, so we can emit a error on invalid input
even if that prticular flag will not matter in that particular run of the
analyzer. Another very big benefit of this is that debug.ConfigDumper will now
show the value of all configs every single time.
Also, almost all options related class have a similar interface, so uniformity
is also a benefit.
The implementation for errors on invalid input will be commited shorty.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53692
llvm-svn: 348031
During the review of D41938 a condition check with an early exit accidentally
slipped into a branch, leaving the other branch unprotected. This may result in
an assertion later on. This hotfix moves this contition check outside of the
branch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55051
llvm-svn: 347981
This patch should not introduce any behavior changes. It consists of
mostly one of two changes:
1. Replacing fall through comments with the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro
2. Inserting 'break' before falling through into a case block consisting
of only 'break'.
We were already using this warning with GCC, but its warning behaves
slightly differently. In this patch, the following differences are
relevant:
1. GCC recognizes comments that say "fall through" as annotations, clang
doesn't
2. GCC doesn't warn on "case N: foo(); default: break;", clang does
3. GCC doesn't warn when the case contains a switch, but falls through
the outer case.
I will enable the warning separately in a follow-up patch so that it can
be cleanly reverted if necessary.
Reviewers: alexfh, rsmith, lattner, rtrieu, EricWF, bollu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53950
llvm-svn: 345882
By making sure the returned value from getKnownSVal is consistent with
the value used inside expression engine.
PR38427
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51252
llvm-svn: 340965
This fix is similar to r337769 and addresses a regression caused by r337167.
When an operation between a nonloc::LocAsInteger and a non-pointer symbol
is performed, the LocAsInteger-specific part of information is lost.
When the non-pointer symbol is collapsing into a constant, we cannot easily
re-evaluate the result, because we need to recover the missing
LocAsInteger-specific information (eg., integer type, or the very fact that
this pointer was at some point converted to an integer).
Add one more defensive check to prevent crashes on trying to simplify a
SymSymExpr with different Loc-ness of operands.
Differential Revision:
llvm-svn: 338420
Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/rC329780 not only rearranges comparisons but
also binary expressions. This latter behavior is not protected by the analyzer
option. Hower, since no complexity threshold is enforced to the symbols this
may result in exponential execution time if the expressions are too complex:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38208. For a quick fix we extended the
analyzer option to also cover the additive cases.
This is only a temporary fix, the final solution should be enforcing the
complexity threshold to the symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49536
llvm-svn: 337678
The canonical representation of pointer &SymRegion{$x} casted to boolean is
"$x != 0", not "$x". Assertion added in r337227 catches that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48232
llvm-svn: 337228
In the current SVal hierarchy there are multiple ways of representing certain
values but few are actually used and expected to be seen by the code.
In particular, a value of a symbolic pointer is always represented by a
loc::MemRegionVal that wraps a SymbolicRegion that wraps the pointer symbol
and never by a nonloc::SymbolVal that wraps that symbol directly.
Assert the aforementioned fact. Fix one minor violation of it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48205
llvm-svn: 337227
Memoize simplification so that we didn't need to simplify the same symbolic
expression twice within the same program state.
Gives ~25% performance boost on the artificial test in test/Analysis/hangs.c.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47402
llvm-svn: 333671
When neither LHS nor RHS of a binary operator expression can be simplified,
return the original expression instead of re-evaluating the binary operator.
Such re-evaluation was causing recusrive re-simplification which caused
the algorithmic complexity to explode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47155
llvm-svn: 333670
Expression rearrangement in SValBuilder (see rL329780) crashes with an assert if the type of the integer is different from the type of the symbol. This fix adds a check that prevents rearrangement in such cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45557
llvm-svn: 330064
Since the range-based constraint manager (default) is weak in handling comparisons where symbols are on both sides it is wise to rearrange them to have symbols only on the left side. Thus e.g. A + n >= B + m becomes A - B >= m - n which enables the constraint manager to store a range m - n .. MAX_VALUE for the symbolic expression A - B. This can be used later to check whether e.g. A + k == B + l can be true, which is also rearranged to A - B == l - k so the constraint manager can check whether l - k is in the range (thus greater than or equal to m - n).
The restriction in this version is the the rearrangement happens only if both the symbols and the concrete integers are within the range [min/4 .. max/4] where min and max are the minimal and maximal values of their type.
The rearrangement is not enabled by default. It has to be enabled by using -analyzer-config aggressive-relational-comparison-simplification=true.
Co-author of this patch is Artem Dergachev (NoQ).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41938
llvm-svn: 329780
Represent the symbolic value for results of pointer arithmetic on void pointers
in a different way: instead of making void-typed element regions, make
char-typed element regions.
Add an assertion that ensures that no void-typed regions are ever constructed.
This is a refactoring of internals that should not immediately affect
the analyzer's (default) behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40939
llvm-svn: 322775
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
This patch fixes analyzer's crash on the newly added test case
(see also https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34374).
Pointers subtraction appears to be modeled incorrectly
in the following example:
char* p;
auto n = p - reinterpret_cast<char*>((unsigned long)1);
In this case the analyzer (built without this patch)
tries to create a symbolic value for the difference
treating reinterpret_cast<char*>((unsigned long)1)
as an integer, that is not correct.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38214
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 314141
This diff fixes modeling of arithmetic
expressions where pointers are treated as integers
(i.e. via C-style / reinterpret casts).
For now we return UnknownVal unless the operation is a comparison.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37120
llvm-svn: 311935
This diff fixes a crash (triggered assert) on the newly added test case.
In the method Simplifier::VisitSymbolData we check the type of S and return
Loc/NonLoc accordingly.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36564
llvm-svn: 310887
This is a follow up for one of
the previous diffs https://reviews.llvm.org/D32328.
getTypeSize and with getIntWidth are not equivalent for bool
(see https://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/ASTContext_8cpp_source.html#l08444),
this causes a number of issues
(for instance, if APint X representing a bool is created
with the wrong bit width then X is not comparable against Min/Max
(because of the different bit width), that results in crashes
(triggered asserts) inside assume* methods),
for examples see the newly added test cases.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35041
llvm-svn: 307604
