used when we instantiate C++ new expressions, delete expressions, and
object-construction expressions. Fixes PR6424, although we can't test
all of it until we finish implementing lookup of "operator delete" for
new expressions (!).
llvm-svn: 97195
to mark the constructor as referenced. Fixes the narrow issue reported
in PR6424, but there are a few other places that I'll fix before
closing out that PR.
llvm-svn: 97185
compilation using g++ v3.4.
I'll watch the buildbots and back out if necessary.
Feel free to do the same if something breaks.
Without this patch I get (on g++ 3.4.6) following error:
In file included from clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp:14:
clang/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h: In member function `clang::ASTOwningResult<&clang::ActionBase::DeleteExpr> clang::TreeTransform<Derived>::RebuildCXXPseudoDestructorExpr(clang::ASTOwningResult<&clang::ActionBase::DeleteExpr>, clang::SourceLocation, bool, clang::NestedNameSpecifier*, clang::SourceRange, clang::TypeSourceInfo*, clang::SourceLocation, clang::SourceLocation, clang::PseudoDestructorTypeStorage)':
clang/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h:5784: error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
clang/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h:5784: error: expected primary-expression before ')' token
make[4]: *** [clang/lib/Sema/Release/SemaTemplate.o] Error 1
llvm-svn: 97136
class types, dependent types, and namespaces. I had previously
weakened this invariant while working on parsing pseudo-destructor
expressions, but recent work in that area has made these changes
unnecessary.
llvm-svn: 97112
expressions that look like pseudo-destructors, e.g.,
p->T::~T()
where p has dependent type.
At template instantiate time, we determine whether we actually have a
pseudo-destructor or a member access, and funnel down to the
appropriate routine in Sema.
Fixes PR6380.
llvm-svn: 97092
CXXPseudoDestructorExpr.
Update template instantiation for pseudo-destructor expressions to use
this source information and to make use of
Sema::BuildPseudoDestructorExpr when the base expression is dependent
or refers to a scalar type.
llvm-svn: 97079
destructor calls, e.g.,
p->T::~T
We now detect when the member access that we've parsed, e.g.,
p-> or x.
may be a pseudo-destructor expression, either because the type of p or
x is a scalar or because it is dependent (and, therefore, may become a
scalar at template instantiation time).
We then parse the pseudo-destructor grammar specifically:
::[opt] nested-name-specifier[opt] type-name :: ∼ type-name
and hand those results to a new action, ActOnPseudoDestructorExpr,
which will cope with both dependent member accesses of destructors and
with pseudo-destructor expressions.
This commit affects the parsing of pseudo-destructors, only; the
semantic actions still go through the semantic actions for member
access expressions. That will change soon.
llvm-svn: 97045
typedef int Int;
int *p;
p->Int::~Int();
This weakens the invariant that the only types in nested-name-specifiers are tag types (restricted to class types in C++98/03). However, we weaken this invariant as little as possible, accepting arbitrary types in nested-name-specifiers only when we're in a member access expression that looks like a pseudo-destructor expression.
llvm-svn: 96743
now cope with the destruction of types named as dependent templates,
e.g.,
y->template Y<T>::~Y()
Nominally, we implement C++0x [basic.lookup.qual]p6. However, we don't
follow the letter of the standard here because that would fail to
parse
template<typename T, typename U>
X0<T, U>::~X0() { }
properly. The problem is captured in core issue 339, which gives some
(but not enough!) guidance. I expect to revisit this code when the
resolution of 339 is clear, and/or we start capturing better source
information for DeclarationNames.
Fixes PR6152.
llvm-svn: 96367
rebuilding a typename type terminating in a template-id (with
dependent template name, naturally) as a TypenameType when, because
its context could be fully resolved, we should have been building it
as a QualifiedNameType. Fixes PR6268.
llvm-svn: 96084
realize that CXXConstructExpr is always implicit, so we should just
return its argument (if there is only one) rather than directly
invoking the constructor.
llvm-svn: 95192
Adjust BuildMemberReferenceExpr to perform the inheritance check on implicit
member accesses, which can arise from unqualified lookups and therefore may
reference decls from enclosing class scopes.
Fixes PR 5838.
llvm-svn: 93510
expressions (e.g., for template instantiation), just transform the
subexpressions and return those, since the temporary-related nodes
will be implicitly regenerated. Fixes PR5867, but I said that
before...
llvm-svn: 92135
a size, check whether the transformed type is itself an array type. If
so, take the major array bound as the size to allocate. Fixes PR5833.
llvm-svn: 91907
- During instantiation, drop default arguments from constructor and
call expressions; they'll be recomputed anyway, and we don't want
to instantiate them twice.
- Rewrote the instantiation of variable initializers to cope with
non-dependent forms properly.
Together, these fix a handful of problems I introduced with the switch
to always rebuild expressions from the source code "as written."
llvm-svn: 91315
implicitly-generated AST nodes. We previously built instantiated nodes
for each of these AST nodes, then passed them on to Sema, which was
not prepared to see already-type-checked nodes (see PR5755). In some
places, we had ugly workarounds to try to avoid re-type-checking
(e.g., in VarDecl initializer instantiation).
Now, we skip implicitly-generated nodes when performing instantiation,
preferring instead to build just the AST nodes that directly reflect
what was written in the source code. This has several advantages:
- We don't need to instantiate anything that doesn't have a direct
correlation to the source code, so we can have better location
information.
- Semantic analysis sees the same thing at template instantiation
time that it would see for a non-template.
- At least one ugly hack (VarDecl initializers) goes away.
Fixes PR5755.
llvm-svn: 91218
are a couple of O(n^2) operations in this, some analogous to the usual O(n^2)
redeclaration problem and some not. In particular, retroactively removing
shadow declarations when they're hidden by later decls is pretty unfortunate.
I'm not yet convinced it's worse than the alternative, though.
llvm-svn: 91045
horrible isAddressOfOperand hack in TreeTransform, since that syntactic
information is managed by the initial parser callbacks now.
That's enough insomniac commits for one night.
llvm-svn: 90849
