Earlier today I was looking at the SBProgress documentation with a
colleague and found another instance where the swig block wasn't
formatting correctly. I've adjusted the docs slightly to fix this. I
don't actually know how to see a preview of our docstrings but I believe
this will fix it.
<img width="829" height="234" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8ef3a2df-92b9-4157-a452-f5e1ec51aa9a"
/>
We recently added an explicit finalize to SBProgress, #128966. I
realized while adding some additional implementations of SBProgress that
we should to add `with` support for ease of use. This patch addresses
adding and `__enter()__` method (which a no-op) and an `__exit()__` to
swig. I also refactor the emitter for the test to leverage `with`
instead of explicitly calling finalize, and I've updated the docstrings.
This patch adds a finalize method which destroys the underlying RAII
SBProgress. My primary motivation for this is so I can write better
tests that are non-flaky, but after discussing with @clayborg in my DAP
message improvement patch (#124648) this is probably an essential API
despite that I originally argued it wasn't.
Recently I've been working on a lot of internal Python tooling, and in
certain cases I want to report async to the script over DAP. Progress.h
already handles this, so I've exposed Progress via the SB API so Python
scripts can also update progress objects.
I actually have no idea how to test this, so I just wrote a [toy command
to test
it](https://gist.github.com/Jlalond/48d85e75a91f7a137e3142e6a13d0947)
I also copied the first section of the extensive Progress.h class
documentation to the docstrings.
