We do not need this in the attributor, because `ST.getWavesPerEU`
accounts for both the waves-per-eu and flat-workgroup-size attributes.
If the waves-per-eu values are not valid, it drops them. In the
attributor, we only need to propagate the values without using
intermediate flat workgroup size values.
Fixes SWDEV-550257.
Currently, we use `AAAMDWavesPerEU` to iteratively update values based
on attributes from the associated function, potentially propagating
user-annotated values, along with `AAAMDFlatWorkGroupSize`. Similarly,
we have `AAAMDFlatWorkGroupSize`. However, since the value calculated
through the flat workgroup size always dominates the user annotation
(i.e., the attribute), running `AAAMDWavesPerEU` iteratively is
unnecessary if no user-annotated value exists.
This PR completely rewrites how the `amdgpu-waves-per-eu` attribute is
handled in `AMDGPUAttributor`. The key changes are as follows:
- `AAAMDFlatWorkGroupSize` remains unchanged.
- `AAAMDWavesPerEU` now only propagates user-annotated values.
- A new function is added to check and update `amdgpu-waves-per-eu`
based on the following rules:
- No waves per eu, no flat workgroup size: Assume a flat workgroup size
of `1,1024` and compute waves per eu based on this.
- No waves per eu, flat workgroup size exists: Use the provided flat
workgroup size to compute waves-per-eu.
- Waves per eu exists, no flat workgroup size: This is a tricky case. In
this PR, we assume a flat workgroup size of `1,1024`, but this can be
adjusted if a different approach is preferred. Alternatively, we could
directly use the user-annotated value.
- Both waves per eu and flat workgroup size exist: If there’s a
conflict, the value derived from the flat workgroup size takes
precedence over waves per eu.
This PR also updates the logic for merging two waves per eu pairs. The
current implementation, which uses `clampStateAndIndicateChange` to
compute a union, might not be ideal. If we think from ensure proper
resource allocation perspective, for instance, if one pair specifies a
minimum of 2 waves per eu, and another specifies a minimum of 4, we
should guarantee that 4 waves per eu can be supported, as failing to do
so could result in excessive resource allocation per wave. A similar
principle applies to the upper bound. Thus, the PR uses the following
approach for merging two pairs, `lo_a,up_a` and `lo_b,up_b`: `max(lo_a,
lo_b), max(up_a, up_b)`. This ensures that resource allocation adheres
to the stricter constraints from both inputs.
Fix#123092.
This performs the minimal replacment of amdgpu-no-agpr to
amdgpu-agpr-alloc=0. Most of the test diffs are due to the new
attribute sorting later alphabetically.
We could do better by trying to perform range merging in the attributor,
and trying to pick non-0 values.
If a function has `amdgpu-flat-work-group-size`, honor it in `initialize` by
taking its value directly; otherwise, it uses the default range as a starting
point. We will no longer manipulate the known range, which can cause issues
because the known range is a "throttle" to the assumed range such that the
assumed range can't get widened properly in `updateImpl` if the known range is
not set properly for whatever reasons. Another benefit of not touching the known
range is, if we indicate pessimistic state, it also invalidates the AA such that
`manifest` will not be called. Since we honor the attribute, we don't want and
will not add any half-baked attribute added to a function.
The AMDGPUAnnotateKernelFeatures pass infers the "amdgpu-calls" and
"amdgpu-stack-objects" attributes, which are used to infer whether we
need to initialize flat scratch. This is, however, not precise. Instead,
we should use AMDGPUAttributor and infer amdgpu-no-flat-scratch-init on
kernels. Refer to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63586 .
SIMachineFunctionInfo has a scan of the function body for inline asm
which may use AGPRs, or callees in SIMachineFunctionInfo. Move this
into the attributor, so it actually works interprocedurally.
Could probably avoid most of the test churn if this bothered to avoid
adding this on subtargets without AGPRs. We should also probably
try to delete the MIR scan in usesAGPRs but it seems to be trickier
to eliminate.
The previous name 'amdgpu_code_object_version', was misleading since
this is really a property of the HSA OS. The new spelling also matches
the asm directive I added in bc82cfb.
Introduce Code Object V6 in Clang, LLD, Flang and LLVM. This is the same
as V5 except a new "generic version" flag can be present in EFLAGS. This
is related to new generic targets that'll be added in a follow-up patch.
It's also likely V6 will have new changes (possibly new metadata
entries) added later.
Docs change are part of the follow-up patch #76955
There are many tests that specify a target triple/CPU flags but no
DataLayout which can lead to IR being generated that has unusual
behaviour. This commit attempts to use the default DataLayout based
on the relevant flags if there is no explicit override on the command
line or in the IR file.
One thing that is not currently possible to differentiate from a missing
datalayout `target datalayout = ""` in the IR file since the current
APIs don't allow detecting this case. If it is considered useful to
support this case (instead of passing "-data-layout=" on the command
line), I can change IR parsers to track whether they have seen such a
directive and change the callback type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141060
This will do a value range merging down the callgraph, unlike the
current pass which can only propagate values to undecorated functions
from a kernel.
This one is a bit weird due to the interaction with the implied range
from amdgpu-flat-workgroup-size. At the default group range of 1,1024,
the minimum implied bounds is 4 so this ends up introducing the
attribute on undecorated functions. We could probably simplify this by
ignoring it and propagating the raw values. The subtarget interaction
and the interaction with amdgpu-flat-workgroup-size only really clamp
invalid values (plus the lower bound doesn't seem to do anything as
far as I can tell anyway).
Summary:
This patch introduces a mechanism to check the code object version from the module flag, This avoids checking from command line.
In case the module flag is missing, we use the current default code object version supported in the compiler.
For tools whose inputs are not IR, we may need other approach (directive, for example) to check the code
object version, That will be in a separate patch later.
For LIT tests update, we directly add module flag if there is only a single code object version associated with all checks in one file.
In cause of multiple code object version in one file, we use the "sed" method to "clone" the checks to achieve the goal.
Reviewer: arsenm
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D14313
This mostly reverts commit 270e96f435596449002fc89962595497481c8770.
Keep the attributor related changes around, but functionally restore
the old behavior as a workaround. Device enqueue goes back to not
working at -O0 with this version.
Invert the sense of the attribute and let the attributor figure this
out like everything else. If needed we can have the not-OpenCL
languages set amdgpu-no-default-queue and amdgpu-no-completion-action
up front so they never have to pay the cost.
There are also so many of these now, the offset use API should
probably consider all of them at once. Maybe they should merge into
one attribute with used fields. Having separate functions for each
field in AMDGPUBaseInfo is also not the greatest API (might as well
fix this when the patch to get the object version from the module
lands).
