Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
This is a second commit, the original one was r351105,
which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351177
Summary:
This patch attempts to redo what was tried in r278783, but was reverted.
These intrinsics should be available on non-windows platforms with "xsave" feature check. But on Windows platforms they shouldn't have feature check since that's how MSVC behaves.
To accomplish this I've added a MS builtin with no feature check. And a normal gcc builtin with a feature check. When _MSC_VER is not defined _xgetbv/_xsetbv will be macros pointing to the gcc builtin name.
I've moved the forward declarations from intrin.h to immintrin.h to match the MSDN documentation and used that as the header file for the MS builtin.
I'm not super happy with this implementation, and I'm open to suggestions for better ways to do it.
Reviewers: rnk, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56686
llvm-svn: 351160
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351105
This removes the old grow_memory and mem.grow-style builtins, leaving just
the memory.grow-style builtins.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56645
llvm-svn: 351089
__builtin_cpu_supports and __builtin_cpu_is use information in __cpu_model to decide cpu features. Before this change, __cpu_model was not declared as dso local. The generated code looks up the address in GOT when reading __cpu_model. This makes it impossible to use these functions in ifunc, because at that time GOT entries have not been relocated. This change makes it dso local.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53850
llvm-svn: 349825
Sibling patch to D55855, this emits UADD_SAT/USUB_SAT generic intrinsics for the SSE saturated math intrinsics instead of expanding to a IR code sequence that could be difficult to reassemble.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55879
llvm-svn: 349631
The special lowering for __builtin_mul_overflow introduced in r320902
fixed an ICE seen when passing mixed-sign operands to the builtin.
This patch extends the special lowering to cover mixed-width, mixed-sign
operands. In a few common scenarios, calls to muloti4 will no longer be
emitted.
This should address the latest comments in PR34920 and work around the
link failure seen in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1657544
Testing:
- check-clang
- A/B output comparison with: https://gist.github.com/vedantk/3eb9c88f82e5c32f2e590555b4af5081
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55843
llvm-svn: 349542
Summary:
This patch adds `__builtin_launder`, which is required to implement `std::launder`. Additionally GCC provides `__builtin_launder`, so thing brings Clang in-line with GCC.
I'm not exactly sure what magic `__builtin_launder` requires, but based on previous discussions this patch applies a `@llvm.invariant.group.barrier`. As noted in previous discussions, this may not be enough to correctly handle vtables.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: kristina, Romain-Geissler-1A, erichkeane, amharc, jroelofs, cfe-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40218
llvm-svn: 349195
intrin.h had forward declarations for these and lzcntintrin.h had implementations that were only available with -mlzcnt or a -march that supported the lzcnt feature.
For MS compatibility we should always have these builtins available regardless of X86 being the target or the CPU support the lzcnt instruction. The backends should be able to gracefully fallback to something support even if its just shifts and bit ops.
Unfortunately, gcc also implements 2 of the 3 function names here on X86 when lzcnt feature is enabled.
This patch adds builtins for these for MSVC compatibility and drops the forward declarations from intrin.h. To keep the gcc compatibility the two intrinsics that collided have been turned into macros that use the X86 specific builtins with the lzcnt feature check. These macros are only defined when _MSC_VER is not defined. Without them being macros we can get a redefinition error because -ms-extensions doesn't seem to set _MSC_VER but does make the MS builtins available.
Should fix PR40014
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55677
llvm-svn: 349098
__builtin_cpu_supports and __builtin_cpu_is use information in __cpu_model to decide cpu features. Before this change, __cpu_model was not declared as dso local. The generated code looks up the address in GOT when reading __cpu_model. This makes it impossible to use these functions in ifunc, because at that time GOT entries have not been relocated. This change makes it dso local.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53850
llvm-svn: 348978
The addcarry and addcarryx builtins do the same thing. The only difference is that addcarryx previously required adx feature.
This commit removes the adx feature check from addcarryx and removes the addcarry builtin. This matches the builtins that gcc has. We don't guarantee compatibility in builtins, but we generally try to be consistent if its not a burden.
llvm-svn: 348738
It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037
Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the bad CodeGen/builtin-constant-p.c for now
llvm-svn: 348053
Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the following snippet fails:
extern char extern_var;
struct { int a; } a = {__builtin_constant_p(extern_var)};
llvm-svn: 348039
This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was broken.
llvm-svn: 347756
This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:
static bool f(int *a, int *b) {
return !__builtin_constant_p(b - a) || (!(b - a));
}
int arr[] = {1,2,3};
bool g() {
return f(arr, arr + 3);
}
$ clang -O2 -S -emit-llvm a.cc -o -
g() should return true, but after r347417 it became false for some reason.
This also reverts the follow-up commits.
r347417:
> Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
>
> Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
> __builtin_constant_p().
>
> Third time's a charm!
r347446:
> The result of is.constant() is unsigned.
r347480:
> A __builtin_constant_p() returns 0 with a function type.
r347512:
> isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
>
> Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
> be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
> __builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
> constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
> constant.
r347531:
> A "constexpr" is evaluated in a constant context. Make sure this is reflected
> if a __builtin_constant_p() is a part of a constexpr.
llvm-svn: 347656
This was originally part of:
D50924
and should resolve PR37387:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37387
...but it was reverted because some bots using a gcc host compiler
would crash for unknown reasons with this included in the patch.
Trying again now to see if that's still a problem.
llvm-svn: 347527
Summary:
A __builtin_constant_p may end up with a constant after inlining. Use
the is.constant intrinsic if it's a variable that's in a context where
it may resolve to a constant, e.g., an argument to a function after
inlining.
Reviewers: rsmith, shafik
Subscribers: jfb, kristina, cfe-commits, nickdesaulniers, jyknight
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54355
llvm-svn: 347294
As suggested by Richard Smith, and initially put up for review here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53341, this patch removes a hack that was used
to ensure that proper target-feature lists were used when emitting
cpu-dispatch (and eventually, target-clones) implementations. As a part
of this, the GlobalDecl object is proliferated to a bunch more
locations.
Originally, this was put up for review (see above) to get acceptance on
the approach, though discussion with Richard in San Diego showed he
approved of the approach taken here. Thus, I believe this is acceptable
for Review-After-commit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53341
Change-Id: I0a0bd673340d334d93feac789d653e03d9f6b1d5
llvm-svn: 346757
Fix places where the return type of a FunctionDecl was being used in
place of the function type
FunctionDecl::Create() takes as its T parameter the type of function
that should be created, not the return type. Passing in the return type
looks to have been copypasta'd around a bit, but the number of correct
usages outweighs the incorrect ones so I've opted for keeping what T is
the same and fixing up the call sites instead.
This fixes a crash in Clang when attempting to compile the following
snippet of code with -fblocks -fsanitize=function -x objective-c++ (my
original repro case):
void g(void(^)());
void f()
{
__block int a = 0;
g(^(){ a++; });
}
as well as the following which only requires -fsanitize=function -x c++:
void f(char * buf)
{
__builtin_os_log_format(buf, "");
}
Patch by: Ben (bobsayshilol)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53263
llvm-svn: 346601
A mask type is a 1 to 8-byte string that follows the "mask." annotation
in the format string. This enables obfuscating data in the event the
provided privacy level isn't enabled.
rdar://problem/36756282
llvm-svn: 346211
This is fifth in a series of patches to move intrinsic definitions out of intrin.h.
Note: This was reviewed and approved in D54065 but somehow that diff was messed
up. Committing this again with the proper diff.
llvm-svn: 346205
Summary: This is fifth in a series of patches to move intrinsic definitions out of intrin.h.
Reviewers: rnk, efriedma, mstorsjo, TomTan
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, chrib, jfb, kristina, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54065
llvm-svn: 346191
Summary: This is third in a series of patches to move intrinsic definitions out of intrin.h.
Reviewers: rnk, efriedma, mstorsjo, TomTan
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, chrib, jfb, kristina, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54062
llvm-svn: 346189
Summary: Windows SDK needs these intrinsics to be proper builtins. This is second in a series of patches to move intrinsic defintions out of intrin.h.
Reviewers: rnk, mstorsjo, efriedma, TomTan
Reviewed By: rnk, efriedma
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, chrib, jfb, kristina, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54046
llvm-svn: 346044
