Clang FE currently has hot/cold function attribute. But we only have
cold function attribute in LLVM IR.
This patch adds support of hot function attribute to LLVM IR. This
attribute will be used in setting function section prefix/suffix.
Currently .hot and .unlikely suffix only are added in PGO (Sample PGO)
compilation (through isFunctionHotInCallGraph and
isFunctionColdInCallGraph).
This patch changes the behavior. The new behavior is:
(1) If the user annotates a function as hot or isFunctionHotInCallGraph
is true, this function will be marked as hot. Otherwise,
(2) If the user annotates a function as cold or
isFunctionColdInCallGraph is true, this function will be marked as
cold.
The changes are:
(1) user annotated function attribute will used in setting function
section prefix/suffix.
(2) hot attribute overwrites profile count based hotness.
(3) profile count based hotness overwrite user annotated cold attribute.
The intention for these changes is to provide the user a way to mark
certain function as hot in cases where training input is hard to cover
all the hot functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92493
This adds a custom InstVisitor to return false on instructions that
should not be allowed to be outlined. These match the illegal
instructions in the IRInstructionMapper with exception of the addition
of the llvm.assume intrinsic.
Tests all the tests marked: illegal-*-.ll with a test for each kind of
instruction that has been marked as illegal.
Reviewers: jroelofs, paquette
Differential Revisions: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86976
Pretty boring, removeUnwindEdge() already known how to update DomTree,
so if we are to call it, we must first flush our own pending updates;
otherwise, we just stop predecessors from branching to us,
and for certain predecessors, stop their predecessors from
branching to them also.
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.
Fixes DomTree preservation for a number of tests,
all of which are marked as such so that they do not regress.
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.
Fixes DomTree preservation for a large number of tests,
all of which are marked as such so that they do not regress.
If a GPU function is externally reachable we give up trying to find the
(unique) kernel it is called from. This can hinder optimizations. Emit a
remark and explain mitigation strategies.
Reviewed By: tianshilei1992
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93439
Extracting the similar regions is the first step in the IROutliner.
Using the IRSimilarityIdentifier, we collect the SimilarityGroups and
sort them by how many instructions will be removed. Each
IRSimilarityCandidate is used to define an OutlinableRegion. Each
region is ordered by their occurrence in the Module and the regions that
are not compatible with previously outlined regions are discarded.
Each region is then extracted with the CodeExtractor into its own
function.
We test that correctly extract in:
test/Transforms/IROutliner/extraction.ll
test/Transforms/IROutliner/address-taken.ll
test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-same-globals.ll
test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-same-constants.ll
test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-different-structure.ll
Recommit of bf899e891387d07dfd12de195ce2a16f62afd5e0 fixing memory
leaks.
Reviewers: paquette, jroelofs, yroux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86975
The LCSSA pass makes use of a function insertDebugValuesForPHIs() to
propogate dbg.value() intrinsics to newly inserted PHI instructions. Faulty
behaviour occurs when the parent PHI of a newly inserted PHI is not the
most recent assignment to a source variable. insertDebugValuesForPHIs ends
up propagating a value that isn't the most recent assignemnt.
This change removes the call to insertDebugValuesForPHIs() from LCSSA,
preventing incorrect dbg.value intrinsics from being propagated.
Propagating variable locations between blocks will occur later, during
LiveDebugValues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92576
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
If the source instruction has !annotation metadata, all instructions
created during combining should also have it. Tell the builder to
add it.
The !annotation system was discussed on llvm-dev as part of
'RFC: Combining Annotation Metadata and Remarks'
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146393.html)
This patch is based on an earlier patch by Francis Visoiu Mistrih.
Reviewed By: thegameg, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91444
When folding a branch to a common destination, preserve !annotation on
the created instruction, if the terminator of the BB that is going to be
removed has !annotation. This should ensure that !annotation is attached
to the instructions that 'replace' the original terminator.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93410
This patch extends IRBuilder to allow adding/preserving arbitrary
metadata on created instructions.
Instead of using references to specific metadata nodes (like DebugLoc),
IRbuilder now keeps a vector of (metadata kind, MDNode *) pairs, which
are added to each created instruction.
The patch itself is a NFC and only moves the existing debug location
handling over to the new system. In a follow-up patch it will be used to
preserve !annotation metadata besides !dbg.
The current approach requires iterating over MetadataToCopy to avoid
adding duplicates, but given that the number of metadata kinds to
copy/preserve is going to be very small initially (0, 1 (for !dbg) or 2
(!dbg and !annotation)) that should not matter.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93400
Part of the <=> changes in C++20 make certain patterns of writing equality
operators ambiguous with themselves (sorry!).
This patch goes through and adjusts all the comparison operators such that
they should work in both C++17 and C++20 modes. It also makes two other small
C++20-specific changes (adding a constructor to a type that cases to be an
aggregate, and adding casts from u8 literals which no longer have type
const char*).
There were four categories of errors that this review fixes.
Here are canonical examples of them, ordered from most to least common:
// 1) Missing const
namespace missing_const {
struct A {
#ifndef FIXED
bool operator==(A const&);
#else
bool operator==(A const&) const;
#endif
};
bool a = A{} == A{}; // error
}
// 2) Type mismatch on CRTP
namespace crtp_mismatch {
template <typename Derived>
struct Base {
#ifndef FIXED
bool operator==(Derived const&) const;
#else
// in one case changed to taking Base const&
friend bool operator==(Derived const&, Derived const&);
#endif
};
struct D : Base<D> { };
bool b = D{} == D{}; // error
}
// 3) iterator/const_iterator with only mixed comparison
namespace iter_const_iter {
template <bool Const>
struct iterator {
using const_iterator = iterator<true>;
iterator();
template <bool B, std::enable_if_t<(Const && !B), int> = 0>
iterator(iterator<B> const&);
#ifndef FIXED
bool operator==(const_iterator const&) const;
#else
friend bool operator==(iterator const&, iterator const&);
#endif
};
bool c = iterator<false>{} == iterator<false>{} // error
|| iterator<false>{} == iterator<true>{}
|| iterator<true>{} == iterator<false>{}
|| iterator<true>{} == iterator<true>{};
}
// 4) Same-type comparison but only have mixed-type operator
namespace ambiguous_choice {
enum Color { Red };
struct C {
C();
C(Color);
operator Color() const;
bool operator==(Color) const;
friend bool operator==(C, C);
};
bool c = C{} == C{}; // error
bool d = C{} == Red;
}
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78938
When replacing an instruction with !annotation with a newly created
replacement, add the !annotation metadata to the replacement.
This mostly covers cases where the new instructions are created using
the ::Create helpers. Instructions created by IRBuilder will be handled
by D91444.
Reviewed By: thegameg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93399
This change enables pseudo-probe-based sample counts to be consumed by the sample profile loader under the regular `-fprofile-sample-use` switch with minimal adjustments to the existing sample file formats. After the counts are imported, a probe helper, aka, a `PseudoProbeManager` object, is automatically launched to verify the CFG checksum of every function in the current compilation against the corresponding checksum from the profile. Mismatched checksums will cause a function profile to be slipped. A `SampleProfileProber` pass is scheduled before any of the `SampleProfileLoader` instances so that the CFG checksums as well as probe mappings are available during the profile loading time. The `PseudoProbeManager` object is set up right after the profile reading is done. In the future a CFG-based fuzzy matching could be done in `PseudoProbeManager`.
Samples will be applied only to pseudo probe instructions as well as probed callsites once the checksum verification goes through. Those instructions are processed in the same way that regular instructions would be processed in the line-number-based scenario. In other words, a function is processed in a regular way as if it was reduced to just containing pseudo probes (block probes and callsites).
**Adjustment to profile format **
A CFG checksum field is being added to the existing AutoFDO profile formats. So far only the text format and the extended binary format are supported. For the text format, a new line like
```
!CFGChecksum: 12345
```
is added to the end of the body sample lines. For the extended binary profile format, we introduce a metadata section to store the checksum map from function names to their CFG checksums.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92347
Details: Jump Threading does not make sense for the targets with divergent CF
since they do not use branch prediction for speculative execution.
Also in the high level IR there is no enough information to conclude that the branch is divergent or uniform.
This may cause errors in further CF lowering.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93302
A first real transformation that didn't already knew how to do that,
but it's pretty tame - either change successor of all the predecessors
of a block and carefully delay deletion of the block until afterwards
the DomTree updates are appled, or add a successor to the block.
There wasn't a great test coverage for this, so i added extra, to be sure.
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.
Fixes DomTree preservation for a large number of tests,
all of which are marked as such so that they do not regress.
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.
Fixes DomTree preservation for a large number of tests,
all of which are marked as such so that they do not regress.
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.
Apparently, there were no dedicated tests just for that functionality,
so i'm adding one here.
Raw profile count values for each BB are not kept after profile
annotation. We record function entry count and branch weights
and use them to compute the count when needed. This mechanism
works well in a perfect world, but often breaks in real programs,
because of number prevision, inconsistent profile, or bugs in
BFI). This patch uses sum of profile count values to fix
function entry count to make the BFI count close to real profile
counts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61540
Here's another minimal step suggested by D93229 / D93397 .
(I'm trying to be extra careful in these changes because
load transforms are easy to get wrong.)
We can optimistically choose the greater alignment of a
load and its pointer operand. As the test diffs show, this
can improve what would have been unaligned vector loads
into aligned loads.
When we enhance with gep offsets, we will need to adjust
the alignment calculation to include that offset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93406
As discussed in D93229, we only need a minimal alignment constraint
when querying whether a hypothetical vector load is safe. We still
pass/use the potentially stronger alignment attribute when checking
costs and creating the new load.
There's already a test that changes with the minimum code change,
so splitting this off as a preliminary commit independent of any
gep/offset enhancements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93397
Per http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html#llvm_loopnest, the goal of this
patch (and other following patches) is to create facilities that allow
implementing loop nest passes that run on top-level loop nests for the
New Pass Manager.
This patch extends the functionality of LoopPassManager to handle
loop-nest passes by specializing the definition of LoopPassManager that
accepts both kinds of passes in addPass.
Only loop passes are executed if L is not a top-level one, and both
kinds of passes are executed if L is top-level. Currently, loop nest
passes should have the following run method:
PreservedAnalyses run(LoopNest &, LoopAnalysisManager &,
LoopStandardAnalysisResults &, LPMUpdater &);
Reviewed By: Whitney, ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87045
This patch changes the type of cost variables (for instance: Cost, ExtractCost,
SpillCost) to use InstructionCost.
This patch also changes the type of cost variables to InstructionCost in other
functions that use the result of getTreeCost()
This patch is part of a series of patches to use InstructionCost instead of
unsigned/int for the cost model functions.
See this thread for context:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146408.html
Depends on D91174
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93049
Given we haven't yet enabled multiple exiting blocks, this is currently non functional, but it's an obvious extension which cleans up a later patch.
I don't think this is worth review (as it's pretty obvious), if anyone disagrees, feel feel to revert or comment and I will.
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
The OpenMP 5.1 assumptions `no_openmp` and `no_openmp_routines` allow us
to ignore calls that would otherwise prevent ICV tracking.
Once we track more ICVs we might need to distinguish the ones that could
be impacted even with `no_openmp_routines`.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92050
Two observations:
1. Unavailability of DomTree makes it impossible to make
`FoldBranchToCommonDest()` transform in certain cases,
where the successor is dominated by predecessor,
because we then don't have PHI's, and can't recreate them,
well, without handrolling 'is dominated by' check,
which doesn't really look like a great solution to me.
2. Avoiding invalidating DomTree in SimplifyCFG will
decrease the number of `Dominator Tree Construction` by 5
(from 28 now, i.e. -18%) in `-O3` old-pm pipeline
(as per `llvm/test/Other/opt-O3-pipeline.ll`)
This might or might not be beneficial for compile time.
So the plan is to make SimplifyCFG preserve DomTree, and then
eventually make DomTree fully required and preserved by the pass.
Now, SimplifyCFG is ~7KLOC. I don't think it will be nice
to do all this uplifting in a single mega-commit,
nor would it be possible to review it in any meaningful way.
But, i believe, it should be possible to do this in smaller steps,
introducing the new behavior, in an optional way, off-by-default,
opt-in option, and gradually fixing transforms one-by-one
and adding the flag to appropriate test coverage.
Then, eventually, the default should be flipped,
and eventually^2 the flag removed.
And that is what is happening here - when the new off-by-default option
is specified, DomTree is required and is claimed to be preserved,
and SimplifyCFG-internal assertions verify that the DomTree is still OK.
This should be purely non-functional. When touching this code for another reason, I found the handling of the PredicateOrDontVectorize piece here very confusing. Let's make it an explicit state (instead of an implicit combination of two variables), and use early return for options/hint processing.
ResultPtr is guaranteed to be non-null - and using dyn_cast_or_null causes unnecessary static analyzer warnings.
We can't say the same for FirstResult AFAICT, so keep dyn_cast_or_null for that.
The AnnotationRemarks pass is already run at the end of the module
pipeline. This patch also adds it before bailing out for -O0, so remarks
are also generated with -O0.
This patch turns updates VPWidenSelectRecipe to manage the value
it defines using VPDef.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90560
