19 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sjoerd Meijer
86825fc2fb [LoopFlatten] Move it to a LoopPassManager
In D109958 it was noticed that we could optimise the pipeline and avoid
rerunning LoopSimplify/LCSSA for LoopFlatten by moving it to a LoopPassManager.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110057
2021-12-30 12:32:14 +00:00
Florian Hahn
acea6e9cfa
[Passes] Only run extra vector passes if loops have been vectorized.
This patch uses a similar trick as in D113947 to only run the extra
passes after vectorization on functions where loops have been
vectorized.

The reason for running the 'extra vector passes' is
simplification/unswitching of the runtime checks created by LV, there
should be no need to run them if nothing got vectorized

To do that, a new dummy analysis ShouldRunExtraVectorPasses has been
added. If loops have been vectorized for a function, LV will cache the
analysis. At the moment it uses MadeCFGChanges as proxy for loop
vectorized, which isn't perfect (it could be too aggressive, e.g.
because no runtime checks have been added), but should be good enough
for now.

The extra passes are now managed by a new FunctionPassManager that
runs its passes only if ShouldRunExtraVectorPasses has been cached.

Without this patch, `-extra-vectorizer-passes` has the following
compile-time impact:

NewPM-O3: +4.86%
NewPM-ReleaseThinLTO: +3.56%
NewPM-ReleaseLTO-g: +7.17%

http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=ead3979a92fc33add4710c4510d6906260dcb4ad&to=c292da649e2c6e88a31e702fdc474727d09c72bc&stat=instructions

With this patch, that gets reduced to

NewPM-O3: +1.43%
NewPM-ReleaseThinLTO: +1.00%
NewPM-ReleaseLTO-g: +1.58%

http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=ead3979a92fc33add4710c4510d6906260dcb4ad&to=e67d86b57810011cf285eb9aa1944781be6096f0&stat=instructions

It is probably still too high to enable by default, but much better.

Reviewed By: aeubanks

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115052
2021-12-10 11:42:45 +00:00
Arthur Eubanks
5c7e783ebe [NFC] Clarify comment about LoopDeletionPass in the optimization pipeline
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115179
2021-12-07 09:58:12 -08:00
Nikita Popov
ae7f468073 [NewPM] Fix MergeFunctions scheduling
MergeFunctions (as well as HotColdSplitting an IROutliner) are
incorrectly scheduled under the new pass manager. The code makes
it look like they run towards the end of the module optimization
pipeline (as they should), while in reality the run at the start.
This is because the OptimizePM populated around them is only
scheduled later.

I'm fixing this by moving these three passes until after OptimizePM
to avoid splitting the function pass pipeline. It doesn't seem
important to me that some of the function passes run after these
late module passes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115098
2021-12-04 17:30:30 +01:00
Anton Afanasyev
c34d157fc7 [Passes] Move AggressiveInstCombine after InstCombine
Swap AIC and IC neighbouring in pipeline. This looks more natural and even
almost has no effect for now (three slightly touched tests of test-suite). Also
this could be the first step towards merging AIC (or its part) to -O2 pipeline.

After several changes in AIC (like D108091, D108201, D107766, D109515, D109236)
there've been observed several regressions (like PR52078, PR52253, PR52289)
that were fixed in different passes (see D111330, D112721) by extending their
functionality, but these regressions were exposed since changed AIC prevents IC
from making some of early optimizations.

This is common problem and it should be fixed by just moving AIC after IC
which looks more logically by itself: make aggressive instruction combining
only after failed ordinary one.

Fixes PR52289

Reviewed By: spatel, RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113179
2021-12-04 14:22:43 +03:00
Nikita Popov
5b94037a30 [PhaseOrdering] Add test for incorrect merge function scheduling
Add an -enable-merge-functions option to allow testing of function
merging as it will actually happen in the optimization pipeline.
Based on that add a test where we currently produce two identical
functions without merging them due to incorrect pass scheduling
under the new pass manager.
2021-12-04 10:12:04 +01:00
Liqiang Tao
7e8f9d6b38 [llvm][Inline] Add FunctionSimplificationPipeline to module inliner pipeline
The FunctionSimplificationPipeline could effectively reduce the size of .text section when module inliner is enabled.

Reviewed By: kazu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114704
2021-12-03 12:13:31 +09:00
Florian Hahn
770a50b28c
[AnnotationRemarks] Support generating annotation remarks with -O0.
This matches the legacy pass manager behavior. If remarks are not
enabled the pass is effectively a no-op.
2021-12-02 15:01:02 +00:00
Arthur Eubanks
e3e25b5112 [NewPM] Add option to prevent rerunning function pipeline on functions in CGSCC adaptor
In a CGSCC pass manager, we may visit the same function multiple times
due to SCC mutations. In the inliner pipeline, this results in running
the function simplification pipeline on a function multiple times even
if it hasn't been changed since the last function simplification
pipeline run.

We use a newly introduced analysis to keep track of whether or not a
function has changed since the last time the function simplification
pipeline has run on it. If we see this analysis available for a function
in a CGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor, we skip running the function passes on
the function. The analysis is queried at the end of the function passes
so that it's available after the first time the function simplification
pipeline runs on a function. This is a per-adaptor option so it doesn't
apply to every adaptor.

The goal of this is to improve compile times. However, currently we
can't turn this on by default at least for the higher optimization
levels since the function simplification pipeline is not robust enough
to be idempotent in many cases, resulting in performance regressions if
we stop running the function simplification pipeline on a function
multiple times. We may be able to turn this on for -O1 in the near
future, but turning this on for higher optimization levels would require
more investment in the function simplification pipeline.

Heavily inspired by D98103.

Example compile time improvements with flag turned on:
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=998dc4a5d3491d2ae8cbe742d2e13bc1b0cacc5f&to=5c27c913687d3d5559ef3ab42b5a3d513531d61c&stat=instructions

Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113947
2021-11-17 09:06:46 -08:00
Arthur Eubanks
19867de9e7 [NewPM] Only invalidate modified functions' analyses in CGSCC passes + turn on eagerly invalidate analyses
Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all
analyses for all functions in the SCC to be invalidated. With this
change, we now manually invalidate analyses for functions we modify,
then let the pass manager know that all function analyses should be
preserved since we've already handled function analysis invalidation.

So far this only touches the inliner, argpromotion, function-attrs, and
updateCGAndAnalysisManager(), since they are the most used.

This is part of an effort to investigate running the function
simplification pipeline less on functions we visit multiple times in the
inliner pipeline.

However, this causes major memory regressions especially on larger IR.
To counteract this, turn on the option to eagerly invalidate function
analyses. This invalidates analyses on functions immediately after
they're processed in a module or scc to function adaptor for specific
parts of the pipeline.

Within an SCC, if a pass only modifies one function, other functions in
the SCC do not have their analyses invalidated, so in later function
passes in the SCC pass manager the analyses may still be cached. It is
only after the function passes that the eager invalidation takes effect.
For the default pipelines this makes sense because the inliner pipeline
runs the function simplification pipeline after all other SCC passes
(except CoroSplit which doesn't request any analyses).

Overall this has mostly positive effects on compile time and positive effects on memory usage.
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=instructions
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=max-rss

D113196 shows that we slightly regressed compile times in exchange for
some memory improvements when turning on eager invalidation.  D100917
shows that we slightly improved compile times in exchange for major
memory regressions in some cases when invalidating less in SCC passes.
Turning these on at the same time keeps the memory improvements while
keeping compile times neutral/slightly positive.

Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304
2021-11-15 14:44:53 -08:00
Arthur Eubanks
1d8750c3da [NFC] Rename GVN -> GVNPass and SROA -> SROAPass
To be more consistent with other pass struct names.

There are still more passes that don't end with "Pass", but these are the important ones.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112935
2021-11-09 10:35:58 -08:00
Liqiang Tao
6cad45d5c6 [llvm][Inline] Add a module level inliner
Add module level inliner, which is a minimum viable product at this point.
Also add some tests for it.

RFC: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-August/152297.html

Reviewed By: kazu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106448
2021-11-09 11:03:29 +08:00
Arthur Eubanks
7175886a0f [NewPM] Make eager analysis invalidation per-adaptor
Follow-up change to D111575.
We don't need eager invalidation on every adaptor. Most notably,
adaptors running passes that use very few analyses, or passes that
purely invalidate specific analyses.

Also allow testing of this via a pipeline string
"function<eager-inv>()".

The compile time/memory impact of this is very comparable to D111575.
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=9a2eec512a29df45c90c2fcb741e9d5c693b1383&to=b9f20bcdea138060967d95a98eab87ce725b22bb&stat=instructions

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113196
2021-11-04 17:16:11 -07:00
Sjoerd Meijer
3fd1902ad8 [FuncSpec] Enable it only with -O3
Function specialisation was running at all optimisation levels (if enabled on
the command line, it is not on by default). That was an oversight and not
something we want to do. Function specialisation duplicates functions when it
triggers, so the backend is processing more functions/instructions resulting in
compile-time increases, which seems more appropriate with -O3 and inline with
GCC. Please note that since function specialisation is not enabled by default,
this didn't require updating any pass manager tests.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112129
2021-11-04 13:59:00 +00:00
Roman Lebedev
9c2469c1dd
[PassManager] buildModuleOptimizationPipeline(): schedule LoopDeletion pass run before vectorization passes
Test thanks to Michael Kuklinski from `#llvm`: https://godbolt.org/z/bdrah5Goo
originally inspired by Daniel Lemire's https://lemire.me/blog/2021/10/26/in-c-is-empty-faster-than-comparing-the-size-with-zero/

We manage to deduce that the answer does not require looping,
but we do that after the last `LoopDeletion` pass run,
so we end up being stuck with a dead loop.

Now, as with all things SCEV, this has
a very expected ~`+0.12%` compile time performance regression:
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=0ae7bf124a9bca76dd9a91b2f7379168ff13f562&to=c2ae57c9b961aeb4a28c747266949340613a6d84&stat=instructions
(for comparison, doing that in function simplification pipeline
would have been ~`+0.5` compile time performance regression, D112840)

Looking at the transformation stats over vanilla test-suite, i think it's rather expected:
```
| statistic name                                   |  baseline |  proposed |     Δ |      % |    |%| |
|--------------------------------------------------|----------:|----------:|------:|-------:|-------:|
| scalar-evolution.NumBruteForceTripCountsComputed |       789 |       888 |    99 | 12.55% | 12.55% |
| scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsNotComputed        |    105592 |    117900 | 12308 | 11.66% | 11.66% |
| loop-delete.NumBackedgesBroken                   |       542 |       559 |    17 |  3.14% |  3.14% |
| regalloc.numExtends                              |        81 |        79 |    -2 | -2.47% |  2.47% |
| indvars.NumFoldedUser                            |       408 |       400 |    -8 | -1.96% |  1.96% |
| indvars.NumElimCmp                               |      3831 |      3758 |   -73 | -1.91% |  1.91% |
| scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsComputed           |    299759 |    304278 |  4519 |  1.51% |  1.51% |
| loop-delete.NumDeleted                           |      8055 |      8128 |    73 |  0.91% |  0.91% |
| machine-cse.NumCommutes                          |       111 |       110 |    -1 | -0.90% |  0.90% |
| globaldce.NumFunctions                           |      1187 |      1192 |     5 |  0.42% |  0.42% |
| codegenprepare.NumSelectsExpanded                |       277 |       278 |     1 |  0.36% |  0.36% |
| loop-unroll.NumRuntimeUnrolled                   |     13841 |     13791 |   -50 | -0.36% |  0.36% |
| machinelicm.NumPostRAHoisted                     |      1168 |      1172 |     4 |  0.34% |  0.34% |
| phi-node-elimination.NumCriticalEdgesSplit       |     83054 |     82879 |  -175 | -0.21% |  0.21% |
| machine-cse.NumPREs                              |      3085 |      3079 |    -6 | -0.19% |  0.19% |
| branch-folder.NumBranchOpts                      |    108122 |    107942 |  -180 | -0.17% |  0.17% |
| loop-unroll.NumUnrolled                          |     40136 |     40067 |   -69 | -0.17% |  0.17% |
| branch-folder.NumDeadBlocks                      |    130818 |    130607 |  -211 | -0.16% |  0.16% |
| codegenprepare.NumBlocksElim                     |     92856 |     92714 |  -142 | -0.15% |  0.15% |
| instsimplify.NumSimplified                       |    103263 |    103129 |  -134 | -0.13% |  0.13% |
| instcombine.NumConstProp                         |     26070 |     26102 |    32 |  0.12% |  0.12% |
| instsimplify.NumExpand                           |      1716 |      1718 |     2 |  0.12% |  0.12% |
| loop-unroll.NumCompletelyUnrolled                |      9236 |      9225 |   -11 | -0.12% |  0.12% |
| branch-folder.NumHoist                           |      2773 |      2770 |    -3 | -0.11% |  0.11% |
| regalloc.NumReloadsRemoved                       |     10822 |     10834 |    12 |  0.11% |  0.11% |
| regalloc.NumSnippets                             |     11394 |     11406 |    12 |  0.11% |  0.11% |
| machine-cse.NumCrossBBCSEs                       |      1052 |      1053 |     1 |  0.10% |  0.10% |
| machinelicm.NumCSEed                             |     99887 |     99784 |  -103 | -0.10% |  0.10% |
| branch-folder.NumTailMerge                       |     72501 |     72435 |   -66 | -0.09% |  0.09% |
| codegenprepare.NumExtUses                        |     22007 |     21987 |   -20 | -0.09% |  0.09% |
| local.NumRemoved                                 |     68232 |     68294 |    62 |  0.09% |  0.09% |
| loop-vectorize.LoopsAnalyzed                     |     75483 |     75413 |   -70 | -0.09% |  0.09% |
```

Note that i'm only changing current PM, and not touching obsolete PM.

This is an alternative to the function simplification pipeline variant
of the same change, D112840. It has both less compile time impact
(since the additional number of SCEV trip count calculations
is way lass less than with the D112840), and it is
much more powerful/impactful (almost 2x more loops deleted).

I have checked, and doing this after loop rotation
is favorable (more loops deleted).

Reviewed By: mkazantsev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112851
2021-11-03 19:24:49 +03:00
Florian Hahn
4a1d63d7d0
[VectorCombine] Add option to only run scalarization transforms.
This patch adds a pass option to only run transforms that scalarize
vector operations and do not create new vector instructions.

When running VectorCombine early in the pipeline introducing new vector
operations can have negative effects, like blocking loop or SLP
vectorization. To avoid regressions, restrict the early VectorCombine
run (when using -enable-matrix) to only perform scalarization and not
introduce new vector operations.

This is done as option to the pass directly, which is then set when
adding the pass to the pipeline. This is done for the new pass manager
only.

Reviewed By: spatel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111800
2021-10-15 20:35:58 +01:00
Hongtao Yu
42ad7e1bc9 [CSSPGO] Turn off PseudoProbeUpdatePass for non-FDO builds.
PseudoProbeUpdatePass is used to distribute sample counts among dulplicated probes.  It doesn't make sense for it to run without a sample profile. The pass takes 1% of the build time.

Reviewed By: wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111847
2021-10-14 17:12:49 -07:00
Florian Hahn
a7c6471a85
[Passes] Run vector-combine early with -fenable-matrix.
IR with matrix intrinsics is likely to also contain large vector
operations, which can benefit from early simplifications.

This is the last step in a series of changes to improve code-gen for
code using matrix subscript operators with the C/C++ matrix extension in
CLang, like

    using matrix_t = double __attribute__((matrix_type(15, 15)));

    void foo(unsigned i, matrix_t &A, matrix_t &B) {
      for (unsigned j = 0; j < 4; ++j)
        for (unsigned k = 0; k < i; k++)
          B[k][j] -= A[k][j] * B[i][j];
    }

https://clang.godbolt.org/z/6dKxK1Ed7

Reviewed By: spatel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102496
2021-09-22 12:48:32 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks
c3ddc13d7d [NFC] Split up PassBuilder.cpp
PassBuilder.cpp is the slowest file to compile in LLVM.
When trying to test changes to pipelines, it takes a long time to recompile.

This doesn't actually speedup building PassBuilder.cpp itself since most
of the time is spent in other large/duplicated functions caused by
PassRegistry.def.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109798
2021-09-15 15:30:39 -07:00