In particular, this also preserves undef when loading from padding,
rather than converting it to zero through a different codepath.
This is the remaining part of D115924.
There are a number of places that specially handle loads from a
uniform value where all the bits are the same (zero, one, undef,
poison), because we a) don't care about the load offset in that
case b) it bypasses casts that might not be legal generally but
do work with uniform values.
We had multiple implementations of this, with a different set of
supported values each time. This replaces two usages with a more
complete helper. Other usages will be replaced separately, because
they have larger impact.
This is part of D115924.
This folded (null + X) == g to false, but of course this is
incorrect if X == g.
Possibly this got confused with the null == g case, which is
already handled elsewhere.
This is now testing (null + g3) != g3 and still coming up with
"true" as the answer. The original case was a less obvious
miscompile with index overflow involved.
This fold is not correct, because indices might evaluate to zero
even if they are not a literal zero integer. Additionally, this
fold would be wrong (in the general case) for non-i8 types as well,
due to index overflow.
Drop this fold and instead let the target-dependent constant
folder compute the actual offset and fold the comparison based
on that.
This fold is incorrect, because it assumes that all indices are
non-zero. This happens to be true for the test as written, but
doesn't hold if we use an extern weak global instead, for which
ptrtoint might be zero.
Add separate tests for the simple constant int case.
We can fold an equality or unsigned icmp between base+offset1 and
base+offset2 with inbounds offsets by comparing the offsets directly.
This replaces a pair of specialized folds that tried to reason
based on the GEP structure instead. One of those folds was plain
wrong (because it does not account for negative offsets), while
the other is unnecessarily complicated and limited (e.g. it will
fail with bitcasts involved).
The disadvantage of this change is that it requires data layout,
so the fold is no longer performed by datalayout-independent
constant folding. I don't think this is a loss in practice, but
it does regress the ConstantExprFold.ll test, which checks folding
without running any passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116332
We should not lose analysis precision if an 'add' has both no-wrap
flags (nsw and nuw) compared to just one or the other.
This patch is modeled on a similar construct that was added with
D59386.
I don't think it is possible to expose a problem with an unsigned
compare because of the way this was coded (nuw is handled first).
InstCombine has an assert that fires with the example from:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52884
...because it was expecting InstSimplify to handle this kind of
pattern with an smax.
Fixes#52884
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116322
An inbounds GEP may still cross the sign boundary, so signed icmps
cannot be folded (https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/XSgi4D). This was
previously fixed for other folds in this function, but this one
was missed.
Adding following fold opportunity:
((A | B) ^ A) & ((A | B) ^ B) --> 0
Reviewed By: spatel, rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115755
This fixes the assertion failure reported at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D114889#3198921 with a straightforward
check, until the cleaner fix in D115924 can be reapplied.
This reverts commit 9fd4f80e33a4ae4567483819646650f5735286e2.
This breaks SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/pr19687.c
in test-suite. Either the test is incorrect, or clang is generating
incorrect union initialization code. I've submitted
https://reviews.llvm.org/D115994 to fix the test, assuming my
interpretation is correct. Reverting this in the meantime as it
may take some time to resolve.
There are a number of places that specially handle loads from a
uniform value where all the bits are the same (zero, one, undef,
poison), because we a) don't care about the load offset in that
case and b) it bypasses casts that might not be legal generally
but do work with uniform values.
We had multiple implementations of this, with a different set of
supported values each time, as well as incomplete type checks in
some cases. In particular, this fixes the assertion reported in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D114889#3198921, as well as a similar
assertion that could be triggered via constant folding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115924
Usually the case where the types are the same ends up being handled
fine because it's legal to do a trivial bitcast to the same type.
However, this is not true for aggregate types. Short-circuit the
whole code if the types match exactly to account for this.
The test is switched to use -instsimplify as it is in the
InstSimplify directory. In this particular case InstCombine does
fold the load (in a very roundabout way), but InstSimplify does not.
Refer to https://llvm.org/PR52546.
Simplifies the following cases:
not(X) == 0 -> X != 0 -> X
not(X) <=u 0 -> X >u 0 -> X
not(X) >=s 0 -> X <s 0 -> X
not(X) != 1 -> X == 1 -> X
not(X) <=u 1 -> X >=u 1 -> X
not(X) >s 1 -> X <=s -1 -> X
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114666
See D114666 for proposed code change to instsimplify.
The difference between the CHECK result of these 2 tests
highlights missed folds in instsimplify
(e.g. (icmp eq (xor X, true), false) -> X) that are
already being handled by instcombine.
The tests are based on:
llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/icmp-bool-constant.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115209
This replaces the 'or' from 4b30076f16fc with an 'and'.
We have to guard against propagating undef elements from
vector 'not' values:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/irMwRc
Reduce code duplication for commutative pattern matching
and fix a miscompile.
We can't safely propagate an undef element in this transform:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/s5xy55
This adjusts all the MVE and CDE intrinsics now that v2i1 is a legal
type, to use a <2 x i1> as opposed to emulating the predicate with a
<4 x i1>. The v4i1 workarounds have been removed leaving the natural
v2i1 types, notably in vctp64 which now generates a v2i1 type.
AutoUpgrade code has been added to upgrade old IR, which needs to
convert the old v4i1 to a v2i1 be converting it back and forth to an
integer with arm.mve.v2i and arm.mve.i2v intrinsics. These should be
optimized away in the final assembly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114455
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/4PaPDy
There's a related fold where the inner 'or' is replaced by 'and',
but that needs to be more careful about matching a 'not'.
(~a & b) ^ (a | b) --> a
This is the swapped and/or (Demorgan?) sibling fold for
the fold added with D114462 ( 892648b18a8c ).
This case is easier to specify because we are returning
a root value, not a 'not':
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/SRzj4f
(a & b) ^ (~a | b) --> ~a
I was looking for a shortcut to reduce some of the complex logic
folds that are currently up for review (D113216
and others in that stack), and I found this missing from
instcombine/instsimplify.
There is a trade-off in putting it into instsimplify: because
we can't create new values here, we need a strict 'not' op (no
undef elements). Otherwise, the fold is not valid:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/k_AGGj
If this was in instcombine instead, we could create the proper
'not'. But having the fold here benefits other passes like GVN
that use instsimplify as an analysis.
There is a related fold where 'and' and 'or' are swapped, and
that is planned as a follow-up commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114462
