Instead of summing leading zeros on the input operands, multiply the
max possible values of those inputs and count the leading zeros of
the result. This can give us an extra zero bit (typically in cases
where one of the operands is a known constant).
This allows folding away the remaining 'add' ops in the motivating
bug (modeled in the PhaseOrdering IR test):
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/48399Fixes#48399
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115969
~(iN X s>> (N-1)) & Y --> (X s< 0) ? 0 : Y
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/JKlQ9x
This is similar to D111410 / 727e642e970d028049d ,
but it includes a 'not' of the signbit and so it
saves an instruction in the basic pattern.
DAGCombiner or target-specific folds can expand
this back into bit-hacks.
The diffs in the logical-select tests are not true
regressions - running early-cse and another round
of instcombine is expected in a normal opt pipeline,
and that reduces back to a minimal form as shown
in the duplicated PhaseOrdering test.
I have no understanding of the SystemZ diffs, so
I made the minimal edits suggested by FileCheck to
make that test pass again. That whole test file is
wrong though. It is running the entire optimizer (-O2)
to check IR, and then topping that by even running
codegen and checking asm. It needs to be split up.
Fixes#52631
The 1st test corresponds to a minimally optimized (mem2reg)
version of the example in:
issue #52631
The 2nd test copies an existing instcombine test with the
same pattern. If we canonicalize differently, we can miss
reducing to minimal form in a single invocation of
-instcombine, but that should not escape the normal opt
pipeline.
The basic idea to this is that a) having a single canonical type makes CSE easier, and b) many of our transforms are inconsistent about which types we end up with based on visit order.
I'm restricting this to constants as for non-constants, we'd have to decide whether the simplicity was worth extra instructions. For constants, there are no extra instructions.
We chose the canonical type as i64 arbitrarily. We might consider changing this to something else in the future if we have cause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115387
MergeFunctions (as well as HotColdSplitting an IROutliner) are
incorrectly scheduled under the new pass manager. The code makes
it look like they run towards the end of the module optimization
pipeline (as they should), while in reality the run at the start.
This is because the OptimizePM populated around them is only
scheduled later.
I'm fixing this by moving these three passes until after OptimizePM
to avoid splitting the function pass pipeline. It doesn't seem
important to me that some of the function passes run after these
late module passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115098
Swap AIC and IC neighbouring in pipeline. This looks more natural and even
almost has no effect for now (three slightly touched tests of test-suite). Also
this could be the first step towards merging AIC (or its part) to -O2 pipeline.
After several changes in AIC (like D108091, D108201, D107766, D109515, D109236)
there've been observed several regressions (like PR52078, PR52253, PR52289)
that were fixed in different passes (see D111330, D112721) by extending their
functionality, but these regressions were exposed since changed AIC prevents IC
from making some of early optimizations.
This is common problem and it should be fixed by just moving AIC after IC
which looks more logically by itself: make aggressive instruction combining
only after failed ordinary one.
Fixes PR52289
Reviewed By: spatel, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113179
Add an -enable-merge-functions option to allow testing of function
merging as it will actually happen in the optimization pipeline.
Based on that add a test where we currently produce two identical
functions without merging them due to incorrect pass scheduling
under the new pass manager.
The basic problem we have is that we're trying to reuse an instruction which is mapped to some SCEV. Since we can have multiple such instructions (potentially with different flags), this is analogous to our need to drop flags when performing CSE. A trivial implementation would simply drop flags on any instruction we decided to reuse, and that would be correct.
This patch is almost that trivial patch except that we preserve flags on the reused instruction when existing users would imply UB on overflow already. Adding new users can, at most, refine this program to one which doesn't execute UB which is valid.
In practice, this fixes two conceptual problems with the previous code: 1) a binop could have been canonicalized into a form with different opcode or operands, or 2) the inbounds GEP case which was simply unhandled.
On the test changes, most are pretty straight forward. We loose some flags (in some cases, they'd have been dropped on the next CSE pass anyways). The one that took me the longest to understand was the ashr-expansion test. What's happening there is that we're considering reuse of the mul, previously we disallowed it entirely, now we allow it with no flags. The surrounding diffs are all effects of generating the same mul with a different operand order, and then doing simple DCE.
The loss of the inbounds is unfortunate, but even there, we can recover most of those once we actually treat branch-on-poison as immediate UB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112734
This patch fixes PR52111. The problem is that LV propagates poison-generating flags (`nuw`/`nsw`, `exact`
and `inbounds`) in instructions that contribute to the address computation of widen loads/stores that are
guarded by a condition. It may happen that when the code is vectorized and the control flow within the loop
is linearized, these flags may lead to generating a poison value that is effectively used as the base address
of the widen load/store. The fix drops all the integer poison-generating flags from instructions that
contribute to the address computation of a widen load/store whose original instruction was in a basic block
that needed predication and is not predicated after vectorization.
Reviewed By: fhahn, spatel, nlopes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111846
This is one of those wonderful "in theory X doesn't matter, but in practice is does" changes. In this particular case, we shift the IVs inserted by the runtime unroller to clamp iteration count of the loops* from decrementing to incrementing.
Why does this matter? A couple of reasons:
* SCEV doesn't have a native subtract node. Instead, all subtracts (A - B) are represented as A + -1 * B and drops any flags invalidated by such. As a result, SCEV is slightly less good at reasoning about edge cases involving decrementing addrecs than incrementing ones. (You can see this in the inferred flags in some of the test cases.)
* Other parts of the optimizer produce incrementing IVs, and they're common in idiomatic source language. We do have support for reversing IVs, but in general if we produce one of each, the pair will persist surprisingly far through the optimizer before being coalesced. (You can see this looking at nearby phis in the test cases.)
Note that if the hardware prefers decrementing (i.e. zero tested) loops, LSR should convert back immediately before codegen.
* Mostly irrelevant detail: The main loop of the prolog case is handled independently and will simple use the original IV with a changed start value. We could in theory use this scheme for all iteration clamping, but that's a larger and more invasive change.
The unrolling code was previously inserting new cloned blocks at the end of the function. The result of this with typical loop structures is that the new iterations are placed far from the initial iteration.
With unrolling, the general assumption is that the a) the loop is reasonable hot, and b) the first Count-1 copies of the loop are rarely (if ever) loop exiting. As such, placing Count-1 copies out of line is a fairly poor code placement choice. We'd much rather fall through into the hot (non-exiting) path. For code with branch profiles, later layout would fix this, but this may have a positive impact on non-PGO compiled code.
However, the real motivation for this change isn't performance. Its readability and human understanding. Having to jump around long distances in an IR file to trace an unrolled loop structure is error prone and tedious.
This reverts commit 7cd273c339cfe8427404f881ae280bd9fae6ff78.
Several patches with tests fixes have been applied:
0cada82f0a30e5ae22dce66b58604ab9b47a3897 "[Test] Remove incorrect test in GVN"
97cb13615d6d9df254e3c0f3deef9eaedfe189b6 "[Test] Separate IndVars test into AArch64 and X86 parts"
985cc490f17d28b20392ee214895d947b85120ef "[Test] Remove separated test in IndVars",
and test failures caused by 5ec2386 should be resolved now.
(Cond & C) | (~bitcast(Cond) & D) --> bitcast (select Cond, (bc C), (bc D))
This is part of fixing:
https://llvm.org/PR34047
That report shows a case where a bitcast is sitting between the select condition
candidate and its 'not' value due to current cast canonicalization rules.
There's a bitcast type restriction that might be violated in existing matching,
but I still need to investigate if that is possible -
Alive2 shows we can only do this transform safely when the bitcast is from
narrow to wide vector elements (otherwise poison could leak into elements
that were safe in the original code):
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Hf66qh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113035
This reapplies patch db289340c841990055a164e8eb2a3b5ff25677bf.
The test failures on build with expensive checks caused by the patch happened due
to the fact that we sorted loop Phis in replaceCongruentIVs using llvm::sort,
which shuffles the given container if the expensive checks are enabled,
so equivalent Phis in the sorted vector had different mutual order from run
to run. replaceCongruentIVs tries to replace narrow Phis with truncations
of wide ones. In some test cases there were several Phis with the same
width, so if their order differs from run to run, the narrow Phis would
be replaced with a different Phi, depending on the shuffling result.
The patch ae14fae0ff4304022beda5ab484f84ac0fdda807 fixed this issue by
replacing llvm::sort with llvm::stable_sort.
Extended value is known to be inside range smaller than full one.
Prevent SCCP to mark such value as overdefined.
Fixes PR52253
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112721
In IndVarSimplify after simplifying and extending loop IVs we call 'replaceCongruentIVs'.
This function optionally takes a TTI argument to be able to replace narrow IVs uses
with truncates of the widest one.
For some reason the TTI wasn't passed to the function, so it couldn't perform such
transform.
This patch fixes it.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113024
Now that the reasoning was added to ConstantRange in D90924,
this replicates IndVars variant of this transform (D111836)
in a pass that uses value range reasoning for the transform.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112895
The final reduction nodes should not be reordered, the order does not
matter for reductions. Also, it might be profitable to vectorize smaller
reduction trees, reduction cost may compensate small tree cost.
Part of D111574
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112467
This patch adds a pass option to only run transforms that scalarize
vector operations and do not create new vector instructions.
When running VectorCombine early in the pipeline introducing new vector
operations can have negative effects, like blocking loop or SLP
vectorization. To avoid regressions, restrict the early VectorCombine
run (when using -enable-matrix) to only perform scalarization and not
introduce new vector operations.
This is done as option to the pass directly, which is then set when
adding the pass to the pipeline. This is done for the new pass manager
only.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111800
Add lshr (sext i1 X to iN), C --> select (X, -1 >> C, 0) case. This expands
C == N-1 case to arbitrary C.
Fixes PR52078.
Reviewed By: spatel, RKSimon, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111330
Running -vector-combine early can introduce new vector operations,
blocking loop/SLP vectorization. The added test case could be better
optimized by the SLPVectorizer if no new vector operations are added
early.
This patch adds a new cost heuristic that allows peeling a single
iteration off read-only loops, if the loop contains a load that
1. is feeding an exit condition,
2. dominates the latch,
3. is not already known to be dereferenceable,
4. and has a loop invariant address.
If all non-latch exits are terminated with unreachable, such loads
in the loop are guaranteed to be dereferenceable after peeling,
enabling hoisting/CSE'ing them.
This enables vectorization of loops with certain runtime-checks, like
multiple calls to `std::vector::at` if the vector is passed as pointer.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108114
It seems the crashes we saw wasn't caused by this (see comments on the review).
> This is basically D108837 but for jump threading. Free instructions
> should be ignored for the threading decision. JumpThreading already
> skips some free instructions (like pointer bitcasts), but does not
> skip various free intrinsics -- in fact, it currently gives them a
> fairly large cost of 2.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110290
This reverts commit 4604695d7c20e72b551a1a5224f3de877cb41bd3.
It caused compiler crashes, see comment on the code review for repro.
> This is basically D108837 but for jump threading. Free instructions
> should be ignored for the threading decision. JumpThreading already
> skips some free instructions (like pointer bitcasts), but does not
> skip various free intrinsics -- in fact, it currently gives them a
> fairly large cost of 2.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110290
This reverts commit 1e3c6fc7cb9d2ee6a5328881f95d6643afeadbff.
This is basically D108837 but for jump threading. Free instructions
should be ignored for the threading decision. JumpThreading already
skips some free instructions (like pointer bitcasts), but does not
skip various free intrinsics -- in fact, it currently gives them a
fairly large cost of 2.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110290
This patch is for fixing potential shufflevector-related bugs like D93818.
As D93818, this patch change shufflevector's default placeholder to poison.
To reduce risk, it was divided into several patches, and this patch is for InstCombineCompares and InstructionCombining.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110227
IR with matrix intrinsics is likely to also contain large vector
operations, which can benefit from early simplifications.
This is the last step in a series of changes to improve code-gen for
code using matrix subscript operators with the C/C++ matrix extension in
CLang, like
using matrix_t = double __attribute__((matrix_type(15, 15)));
void foo(unsigned i, matrix_t &A, matrix_t &B) {
for (unsigned j = 0; j < 4; ++j)
for (unsigned k = 0; k < i; k++)
B[k][j] -= A[k][j] * B[i][j];
}
https://clang.godbolt.org/z/6dKxK1Ed7
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102496
This patch updates VectorCombine to use a worklist to allow iterative
simplifications where a combine enables other combines.
Suggested in D100302.
The main use case at the moment is foldSingleElementStore and
scalarizeLoadExtract working together to improve scalarization.
Note that we now also do not run SimplifyInstructionsInBlock on the
whole function if there have been changes. This means we fail to
remove/simplify instructions not related to any of the vector combines.
IMO this is fine, as simplifying the whole function seems more like a
workaround for not tracking the changed instructions.
Compile-time impact looks neutral:
NewPM-O3: +0.02%
NewPM-ReleaseThinLTO: -0.00%
NewPM-ReleaseLTO-g: -0.02%
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=52832cd917af00e2b9c6a9d1476ba79754dcabff&to=e66520a4637290550a945d528e3e59573485dd40&stat=instructions
Reviewed By: spatel, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110171
This makes some tests in vector-reductions-logical.ll more stable when
applying D108837.
The cost of branching is higher when vector ops are involved due to
potential SLP transformations.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108935
I can't seem to wrap my head around the proper fix here,
we should be fine without this requirement, iff we can form this form,
but the naive attempt (https://reviews.llvm.org/D106317) has failed.
So just to unblock the release, put up a restriction.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51125
The min/max intrinsics are not yet canonical, but when they are the tail
predications analysis will change from treating them like icmp to
treating them like intrinsics. Unfortunately, they can currently produce
better code by not being tail predicated thanks to the vectorizer picking
higher VF's and the backend folding to better instructions (especially
for saturate patterns). In the long run we will need to improve the
vectorizers cost modelling, recognizing the instruction directly, but in
the meantime this treats min/max as before to prevent performance
regressions.
