Replace and(ext(a),ext(b)) with ext(and(a,b)). This both reduces one instruction, and results in the computation (and/or) being done on a smaller type.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116519
This patch creates folds for cmpi( ext(%x : i1, iN) != 0) -> %x
In essence this matches patterns matching an extension of a boolean, that != 0, which is equivalent to the original condition.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116504
Per the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D116345 it makes sense
to move AtomicRMWOp out of the standard dialect. This was accentuated by the
need to add a fold op with a memref::cast. The only dialect
that would permit this is the memref dialect (keeping it in the standard dialect
or moving it to the arithmetic dialect would require those dialects to have a
dependency on the memref dialect, which breaks linking).
As the AtomicRMWKind enum is used throughout, this has been moved to Arith.
Reviewed By: Mogball
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116392
With VectorType supporting scalable dimensions, we don't need many of
the operations currently present in ArmSVE, like mask generation and
basic arithmetic instructions. Therefore, this patch also gets
rid of those.
Having built-in scalable vector support also simplifies the lowering of
scalable vector dialects down to LLVMIR.
Scalable dimensions are indicated with the scalable dimensions
between square brackets:
vector<[4]xf32>
Is a scalable vector of 4 single precission floating point elements.
More generally, a VectorType can have a set of fixed-length dimensions
followed by a set of scalable dimensions:
vector<2x[4x4]xf32>
Is a vector with 2 scalable 4x4 vectors of single precission floating
point elements.
The scale of the scalable dimensions can be obtained with the Vector
operation:
%vs = vector.vscale
This change is being discussed in the discourse RFC:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-add-built-in-support-for-scalable-vector-types/4484
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111819
The specific description is [[ https://llvm.discourse.group/t/adding-unsigned-integer-ceil-and-floor-in-std-dialect/4541 | Adding unsigned integer ceil in Std Dialect ]] .
When we lower ceilDivOp this will generate below code, sometimes we know m and n are unsigned intergal.Here are some redundant judgments about positive and negative.
So we need to add some unsigned operations to simplify the instructions.
```
ceilDiv(n, m)
x = (m > 0) ? -1 : 1
return (n*m>0) ? ((n+x) / m) + 1 : - (-n / m)
```
unsigned operations:
```
ceilDivU(n, m)
return n ==0 ? 0 : ((n - 1) / m) + 1
```
Reviewed By: Mogball
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113363
Precursor: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110200
Removed redundant ops from the standard dialect that were moved to the
`arith` or `math` dialects.
Renamed all instances of operations in the codebase and in tests.
Reviewed By: rriddle, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110797
Create the Arithmetic dialect that contains basic integer and floating
point arithmetic operations. Ops that did not meet this criterion were
moved to the Math dialect.
First of two atomic patches to remove integer and floating point
operations from the standard dialect. Ops will be removed from the
standard dialect in a subsequent patch.
Reviewed By: ftynse, silvas
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110200
