TestUseSourceCache attempts to write to a build artifact copied from the
source tree, and asserts the write succeeded. If the source tree is read
only, the copy will also be read only, causing it to fail. When
producing the build artifact, ensure that it is writable.
The decorators caused the `test_set_use_source_cache_true()` test to be
skipped in most scenarios. It was only run on a Windows host targeting a
non-Windows remote platform. The source file is opened with the
`FILE_SHARE_DELETE` sharing mode, which allows the file to be removed
even though it is also memory-mapped; at least, this behavior is
observed on Windows 11.
The patch replaces the operation with an attempt to overwrite the file,
which still fails for such files on Windows 11.
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
Summary:
...and replace it with m_last_file_spec instead.
When Source Cache is enabled, the value stored in m_last_file_sp is
already in the Source Cache, and caching it again in SourceManager
brings no extra benefit. All we need is to "remember" the last used
file, and FileSpec can serve the same purpose.
When Source Cache is disabled, the user explicitly requested no caching
of source files, and therefore, m_last_file_sp should NOT be used.
Bug: llvm.org/PR45310
Depends on D76805.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76806
