Timm Baeder ef44d25971
[clang][ExprConst] Diagnose out-of-lifetime access consistently (#175562)
Previously, we had two very similar diagnostics, "read of object outside
its lifetime" and "read of variable whose lifetime has ended".
The difference, as far as I can tell, is that the latter was used when
the variable was created in a function frame that has since vanished,
i.e. in this case:
```c++
constexpr const int& return_local() { return 5; }
static_assert(return_local() == 5);
```
so the output used to be:
```console
array.cpp:602:15: error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression
  602 | static_assert(return_local() == 5);
      |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
array.cpp:602:15: note: read of temporary whose lifetime has ended
array.cpp:601:46: note: temporary created here
  601 | constexpr const int& return_local() { return 5; }
      |                                              ^
```

But then this scenario gets the other diagnostic:
```c++
constexpr int b = b;
```
```console
array.cpp:603:15: error: constexpr variable 'b' must be initialized by a constant expression
  603 | constexpr int b = b;
      |               ^   ~
array.cpp:603:19: note: read of object outside its lifetime is not allowed in a constant expression
  603 | constexpr int b = b;
      |                   ^
```

With this patch, we diagnose both cases similarly:
```c++
constexpr const int& return_local() { return 5; }
static_assert(return_local() == 5);
constexpr int b = b;
```
```console
array.cpp:602:15: error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression
  602 | static_assert(return_local() == 5);
      |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
array.cpp:602:15: note: read of object outside its lifetime is not allowed in a constant expression
  602 | static_assert(return_local() == 5);
      |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
array.cpp:601:46: note: temporary created here
  601 | constexpr const int& return_local() { return 5; }
      |                                              ^
array.cpp:603:15: error: constexpr variable 'b' must be initialized by a constant expression
  603 | constexpr int b = b;
      |               ^   ~
array.cpp:603:19: note: read of object outside its lifetime is not allowed in a constant expression
  603 | constexpr int b = b;
      |                   ^
```

We do lose the "object" vs. "temporary" distinction in the note and only
mention it in the "created here" note. That can be added back if it's
important enough. I wasn't sure.
2026-01-14 08:59:28 +01:00

118 lines
3.6 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,both -std=c++20 %s -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=ref,both -std=c++20 %s
/// FIXME: Slight difference in diagnostic output here.
struct Foo {
int a;
};
constexpr int dead1() {
Foo *F2 = nullptr;
{
Foo F{12}; // expected-note {{declared here}}
F2 = &F;
} // Ends lifetime of F.
return F2->a; // expected-note {{read of object outside its lifetime}} \
// ref-note {{read of object outside its lifetime is not allowed in a constant expression}}
}
static_assert(dead1() == 1, ""); // both-error {{not an integral constant expression}} \
// both-note {{in call to}}
struct S {
int &&r; // both-note {{reference member declared here}}
int t;
constexpr S() : r(0), t(r) {} // both-error {{reference member 'r' binds to a temporary object whose lifetime would be shorter than the lifetime of the constructed object}} \
// both-note {{read of object outside its lifetime is not allowed in a constant expression}} \
// expected-note {{temporary created here}}
};
constexpr int k1 = S().t; // both-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} \
// both-note {{in call to}}
namespace MoveFnWorks {
template<typename T> constexpr T &&ref(T &&t) { return (T&&)t; }
struct Buf {};
struct A {
constexpr A(Buf &buf) : buf(buf) { }
Buf &buf;
};
constexpr bool dtor_calls_dtor() {
struct B {
A &&d;
constexpr B(Buf &buf) : d(ref(A(buf))) {}
};
Buf buf;
{
B b(buf);
}
return true;
}
static_assert(dtor_calls_dtor(), "");
}
namespace PrimitiveMoveFn {
/// This used to crash.
void test() {
const float y = 100;
const float &x = y;
}
}
/// FIXME:
/// 1) This doesn't work for parameters
/// 2) We need to do this for all fields in composite scenarios
namespace PseudoDtor {
typedef int I;
constexpr bool foo() { // both-error {{never produces a constant expression}}
{
int a; // both-note {{destroying object 'a' whose lifetime has already ended}}
a.~I();
}
return true;
}
int k;
struct T {
int n : (k.~I(), 1); // both-error {{constant expression}} \
// both-note {{visible outside that expression}}
};
}
/// Diagnostic differences
namespace CallScope {
struct Q {
int n = 0;
constexpr int f() const { return 0; }
};
constexpr Q *out_of_lifetime(Q q) { return &q; } // both-warning {{address of stack}} \
// expected-note 2{{declared here}}
constexpr int k3 = out_of_lifetime({})->n; // both-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} \
// expected-note {{read of object outside its lifetime}} \
// ref-note {{read of object outside its lifetime}}
constexpr int k4 = out_of_lifetime({})->f(); // both-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} \
// expected-note {{member call on object outside its lifetime}} \
// ref-note {{member call on object outside its lifetime}}
}
namespace ExprDoubleDestroy {
template <typename T>
constexpr bool test() {
T{}.~T(); // both-note {{lifetime has already ended}}
return true;
}
struct S { int x; };
constexpr bool t = test<S>(); // both-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} \
// both-note {{in call to}}
}