7c402b8b81
The checks for the 'z' and 't' format specifiers added in the original PR #143653 had some issues and were overly strict, causing some build failures and were consequently reverted at4c85bf2fe8. In the latest commit27c58629ec, I relaxed the checks for the 'z' and 't' format specifiers, so warnings are now only issued when they are used with mismatched types. The original intent of these checks was to diagnose code that assumes the underlying type of `size_t` is `unsigned` or `unsigned long`, for example: ```c printf("%zu", 1ul); // Not portable, but not an error when size_t is unsigned long ``` However, it produced a significant number of false positives. This was partly because Clang does not treat the `typedef` `size_t` and `__size_t` as having a common "sugar" type, and partly because a large amount of existing code either assumes `unsigned` (or `unsigned long`) is `size_t`, or they define the equivalent of size_t in their own way (such as sanitizer_internal_defs.h).2e67dcfdcd/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_internal_defs.h (L203)
20 lines
700 B
C
20 lines
700 B
C
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 %s \
|
|
// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core \
|
|
// RUN: -analyzer-checker=unix.StdCLibraryFunctions \
|
|
// RUN: -analyzer-config unix.StdCLibraryFunctions:DisplayLoadedSummaries=true \
|
|
// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection \
|
|
// RUN: -analyzer-config eagerly-assume=false \
|
|
// RUN: -triple i686-unknown-linux 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: Loaded summary for: __size_t fread(void *restrict, size_t, size_t, FILE *restrict)
|
|
|
|
typedef typeof(sizeof(int)) size_t;
|
|
typedef struct FILE FILE;
|
|
size_t fread(void *restrict, size_t, size_t, FILE *restrict);
|
|
|
|
// Must have at least one call expression to initialize the summary map.
|
|
int bar(void);
|
|
void foo(void) {
|
|
bar();
|
|
}
|