0d9919d362
This reverts commit f2583f3acf596cc545c8c0e3cb28e712f4ebf21b.
There is a large body of non-conforming C-like code using format strings
like this:
#define PRIuS "zu"
void h(size_t foo, size_t bar) {
printf("foo is %"PRIuS", bar is %"PRIuS, foo, bar);
}
Rejecting this code would be very disruptive. We could decide to do
that, but it's sufficiently disruptive that I think it requires
gathering more community consensus with an RFC, and Aaron indicated [1]
it's OK to revert for now so continuous testing systems can see past
this issue while we decide what to do.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D153156#4607717
9 lines
460 B
C++
9 lines
460 B
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
|
|
|
|
void operator "" (const char *); // expected-error {{expected identifier}}
|
|
void operator "k" foo(const char *); // \
|
|
expected-error {{string literal after 'operator' must be '""'}} \
|
|
expected-warning{{user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved}}
|
|
void operator "" tester (const char *); // \
|
|
expected-warning{{user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved}}
|