
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
41 lines
949 B
C++
41 lines
949 B
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: c++03 || c++11 || c++14
|
|
|
|
// test set_unexpected
|
|
|
|
#include <exception>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
#include <cstdlib>
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
void f1() {}
|
|
void f2() {}
|
|
|
|
void f3()
|
|
{
|
|
std::exit(0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
std::unexpected_handler old = std::set_unexpected(f1);
|
|
// verify there is a previous unexpected handler
|
|
assert(old);
|
|
// verify f1 was replace with f2
|
|
assert(std::set_unexpected(f2) == f1);
|
|
// verify calling original unexpected handler calls terminate
|
|
std::set_terminate(f3);
|
|
(*old)();
|
|
assert(0);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|